University of San Francisco Basketball Coach Faces Renewed Scrutiny in Abuse Case, Court Reinstates Damages
A California appeals court has delivered a meaningful ruling in the case of former University of San Francisco (USF) women’s basketball players Marija and Marta Galic, reinstating $500,000 in punitive damages awarded to Marija and ordering a new trial for Marta. The case centers on allegations of years-long verbal and emotional abuse inflicted by head coach Molly Goodenbour.This decision marks a critical turning point, signaling a growing accountability for athlete mistreatment within collegiate sports. It underscores the responsibility of institutions to address and prevent abusive behavior by their coaching staff.
The Core of the Allegations
The Galic twins, originally from Croatia, alleged a consistent pattern of mistreatment during their time with the USF team (2018-2021). This included repeated insults, undue pressure to leave the programme, and a generally hostile environment.
The sisters contend this abuse directly contributed to significant psychological harm, including panic attacks and breakdowns. Expert psychiatric testimony supported their claims, linking their diagnosed psychiatric disorders to Coach Goodenbour’s conduct.
Court’s Decision: A Win for Athlete Rights
Initially, a trial court overturned the $500,000 punitive damage award to Marija. However, the First District Court of Appeal reversed this decision, finding sufficient evidence to support the original jury verdict.
Crucially, the court also determined that Marta was unfairly held to a higher legal standard – requiring proof of “gross negligence” rather than standard negligence - and granted her a new trial to present her case properly.
What This means for College Athletics
The ruling isn’t just a victory for the Galic sisters; it establishes a powerful precedent. Attorney Randolph Gaw, representing the sisters, emphasized the financial consequences universities now face when failing to address abusive coaching behavior.This case highlights the increasing legal and ethical scrutiny surrounding the well-being of student-athletes.Universities can no longer afford to shield coaches accused of mistreatment, as the potential financial and reputational costs are considerable.
Statements from key Parties
Marija Galic expressed gratitude for the court’s decision, stating it “affirms the importance of accountability” and hopes to “empower other athletes who have endured mistreatment.” She and Marta are determined to continue pursuing justice for themselves and others.
USF acknowledged the court’s decision and stated its focus remains on the “progress and success of our student athletes.” Coach Goodenbour, a former Stanford champion, recently received a contract extension through the 2027-28 season, despite these ongoing allegations.
Looking Ahead
This case is far from over. marta Galic will now have the possibility to present her case to a jury, and the financial implications for USF could be significant.
More broadly, the ruling serves as a wake-up call for colleges and universities nationwide. Protecting the mental and emotional health of student-athletes must be a top priority, and institutions must proactively address abusive behavior within their athletic programs.
Resources for athletes Experiencing Abuse:
The NCAA: https://www.ncaa.org/sports/2023/1/11/safesport-resources.aspx
safesport: https://www.safesport.org/
![Early Type 1 Diabetes Detection: Symptoms & Prevention [Podcast]](https://i0.wp.com/kevinmd.com/wp-content/uploads/Design-2-scaled.jpg?resize=150%2C100&ssl=1 "Early Type 1 Diabetes Detection: Symptoms & Prevention [Podcast]")
