The Shifting Landscape of Medicaid Workforce Waivers: A Retreat from Investment in Behavioral Health
For the past few years, a critically important effort has been underway to address critical healthcare workforce shortages, notably in behavioral health, through innovative Medicaid waivers. Though, recent policy shifts signal a dramatic change in direction, raising concerns about the future of these initiatives and the accessibility of care for vulnerable populations. This article delves into the rise and potential fall of Section 1115 Medicaid waivers designed to bolster the healthcare workforce, analyzing the investments made, the reasoning behind the policy reversal, and the implications for states and patients.
The Workforce Crisis & The 1115 Waiver Response
the United States faces a severe shortage of healthcare professionals, a problem acutely felt in the behavioral health sector. Access to mental healthcare is already limited, with states like North Carolina covering only 13% of the identified need and nearly a third of its counties lacking any practicing psychologists. California stakeholders have identified the behavioral workforce crisis as the most significant barrier to expanding crucial behavioral health services.
Recognizing this urgent need, several states turned to Section 1115 Medicaid demonstration waivers – a powerful tool allowing states to test innovative approaches to Medicaid – to implement workforce initiatives. These waivers offered a pathway to invest in programs designed to recruit, train, and retain healthcare professionals, particularly in underserved areas.
Between 2023 and 2024, four states secured approval for over $2.7 billion in combined federal and state funding dedicated to these workforce programs. Initiatives included loan repayment programs,training opportunities,and efforts to expand the pipeline of qualified professionals. Vermont’s waiver incorporates workforce advancement within a broader “Investments Framework,” making specific funding allocations harder to isolate.How 1115 Waivers Work: Budget Neutrality & Funding Mechanisms
Understanding the mechanics of 1115 waivers is crucial. A core principle is budget neutrality. This means that any increased federal spending under the waiver must be offset by savings elsewhere within the Medicaid program. States are required to utilize these savings to fund the approved workforce programs.
Furthermore, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) allowed some states to leverage “Designated State health Programs (DSHP)” funding.This involved freeing up existing state funds – typically used for uncompensated care - to contribute to the state share of the new workforce initiatives, effectively maximizing the impact of federal matching funds.
A Sudden Shift: CMS Reverses Course
Despite the initial momentum and significant investment, the landscape has dramatically changed. In a recent communication, CMS announced it will not approve new 1115 workforce initiatives going forward. While currently approved waivers will be allowed to continue until their expiration dates, CMS signaled it has no intention of extending these programs upon renewal.
This policy reversal is particularly impactful given the timeline.Most waivers are slated to expire in 2027, although california and North Carolina have extensions until 2029. The decision also casts a shadow over pending requests, such as Florida’s May 2025 proposal seeking federal matching funds for workforce training and loan repayment programs across a range of healthcare disciplines.
CMS justified this shift by stating a prioritization of “actions that demonstrate clear health benefits, cost savings, and strong accountability for federal spending.” This suggests a desire for more demonstrable, quantifiable results from waiver programs – a challenge given the inherent complexities of measuring workforce development impact.
Political Context: A Return to prior Policies
This change in direction is not occurring in a vacuum. It represents the latest in a series of actions by the current administration to undo policies enacted during the Biden administration. CMS has also signaled its intention to discontinue existing and reject new waivers related to continuous Medicaid eligibility for adults and children. Earlier actions have also targeted waivers focused on social determinants of health and limited the flexibility of waiver financing tools.
Section 1115 waiver priorities are historically susceptible to change with each presidential administration. As of now, the current administration has yet to articulate its specific priorities for 1115 waiver policy, leaving states in a state of uncertainty.
Implications & Future Outlook
The withdrawal of federal support for workforce initiatives through 1115 waivers has significant implications:
exacerbated Shortages: The existing healthcare workforce shortages, particularly in behavioral health, will likely worsen, limiting access to care for millions of Americans.
Reduced Innovation: States will be less incentivized to explore innovative solutions to address workforce challenges.
Uncertainty for States: States that have invested in these programs face uncertainty about their future and the potential loss of funding.
**Impact on
