Iran’s President Orders Restraint on Protesters, Distinguishes Between Demonstrators and ‘Rioters’
TEHRAN – Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has instructed security forces to exercise restraint in responding to ongoing protests, emphasizing that a crackdown should only occur if national security is directly threatened. The directive, relayed by the president’s executive deputy, Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah, signals a nuanced approach to managing public discontent fueled by economic hardship, even as simultaneously drawing a firm line against violence and disruption. This comes as Iran continues to grapple with economic challenges and public frustration, and follows reports of protests in several cities.
Ghaempanah’s statements, reported on Saturday, February 28, 2026, indicate the government recognizes the right to peaceful assembly, particularly concerning grievances related to rising prices and labor issues. However, he stressed a clear distinction between legitimate protesters and those engaging in what he termed “riotous” behavior, specifically citing incidents involving the occupation of public facilities like hospitals. According to reports from NAMPA/Sputnik, Ghaempanah affirmed that President Pezeshkian is in solid health despite what he described as “cowardly attacks” during negotiations.
Economic Grievances Fuel Protests
The protests are rooted in Iran’s struggling economy, which has been hampered by international sanctions and internal economic policies. The value of the Iranian Rial has fluctuated significantly, contributing to rising inflation and a decline in living standards. Iran International reported that President Pezeshkian has instructed Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to restart talks with the United States, responding to a proposal from President Donald Trump and requests from “friendly governments.” This move suggests a potential shift in diplomatic strategy aimed at alleviating economic pressures.
Ghaempanah noted that Central Bank Governor Abdolnasser Hemmati presented a report to the cabinet outlining planned measures to stabilize the exchange rate. He acknowledged that currency fluctuations are a natural part of the ongoing economic restructuring process, but emphasized the government’s commitment to controlling the situation. The specifics of these measures remain unclear, but the acknowledgement of economic concerns suggests a willingness to address public grievances.
Defining the Line Between Protest and ‘Disorder’
Ghaempanah drew a stark contrast between peaceful protesters and individuals he labeled as “rioters.” He specifically condemned the employ of weapons, knives, firearms, and attacks on military and security centers, characterizing such actions as “unrest and disorder.” He cited an incident in Ilam, where a group reportedly occupied a hospital, as an example of a situation requiring law enforcement intervention to restore order. This distinction is crucial, as it outlines the parameters within which the government will permit demonstrations to proceed without intervention.
The definition of “national security” remains somewhat ambiguous, raising concerns about potential overreach by security forces. However, Ghaempanah’s emphasis on avoiding a crackdown unless national security is undermined suggests a degree of restraint. The Iranian government has a history of suppressing dissent, and this directive represents a potential, though limited, shift in approach.
Leniency for Detainees, Focus on Foreign Interference
Regarding those detained during the protests, Ghaempanah stated that security institutions would exercise “maximum leniency.” He emphasized that individuals who have not engaged in violence or have no connections to foreign actors would be treated with “Islamic compassion.” This suggests a potential for selective enforcement, with harsher penalties reserved for those deemed to be instigators or linked to external forces.
The mention of “foreign actors” echoes a common narrative employed by the Iranian government, which often attributes unrest to external interference. While the extent of any foreign involvement remains unconfirmed, the government’s focus on this aspect highlights its sensitivity to perceived threats to its authority. Mohammad Ja’far Ghaempanah, currently serving as Vice President of Iran for Executive Affairs since August 2024, previously served as chancellor of the Municipal council of Kermanshah.
Pezeshkian’s Diplomatic Overture and Regional Context
President Pezeshkian’s call for renewed talks with the United States, as relayed by Ghaempanah, represents a significant development in the strained relationship between the two countries. The reported proposal from former U.S. President Donald Trump adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The potential for dialogue could offer a pathway to de-escalation and a resolution of the economic challenges facing Iran.
This diplomatic move occurs against a backdrop of regional tensions and ongoing conflicts. Iran’s involvement in regional proxy wars and its nuclear program remain sources of concern for the international community. Any progress in negotiations with the United States could have far-reaching implications for regional stability.
The Role of Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah
Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah’s role as the president’s executive deputy places him at the center of the government’s response to the protests. His statements are therefore indicative of the administration’s overall strategy. As a Reformist politician and ophthalmologist, Ghaempanah’s background suggests a potential for a more moderate approach to governance. His previous role as chancellor of the Municipal council of Kermanshah demonstrates experience in local administration and public service.
Ghaempanah’s emphasis on distinguishing between peaceful protesters and “rioters” reflects a desire to maintain order while acknowledging the legitimacy of public grievances. His commitment to leniency for detainees who have not engaged in violence suggests a willingness to avoid excessive force. However, the ultimate effectiveness of these measures will depend on the actions of security forces on the ground.
Looking Ahead
The situation in Iran remains fluid and unpredictable. The success of President Pezeshkian’s diplomatic overtures and the implementation of economic reforms will be crucial in addressing the underlying causes of the protests. The government’s ability to maintain restraint in responding to demonstrations, while simultaneously upholding law and order, will be a key test of its leadership.
The next significant development to watch for is the outcome of the planned meeting between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Istanbul on Friday. The results of this meeting could signal a potential breakthrough in negotiations or a continuation of the impasse. Further updates on the economic measures being implemented by the Central Bank will also be closely monitored.
What are your thoughts on Iran’s approach to the protests? Share your comments below and let us know what you think. Don’t forget to share this article with your network to retain the conversation going.