Jaboury Ghazoul, professor of ecosystem management at ETH Zürich’s Department of Environmental Systems Science, is widely recognized for his research on the interplay between landscapes and people. His work examines how land-use decisions affect ecological processes and vice versa, with a focus on creating practical outcomes for environmental management and policy. As global efforts to restore degraded ecosystems intensify, Ghazoul emphasizes that renaturation projects must be just in multiple dimensions—not only ecologically sound but also socially equitable and procedurally fair.
The concept of justice in ecological restoration has gained increasing attention in recent years, particularly as large-scale reforestation and rewilding initiatives expand across continents. Ghazoul argues that without addressing questions of fairness—such as who bears the costs, who benefits and how decisions are made—restoration efforts risk undermining their own long-term success. His perspective aligns with growing scholarly consensus that ecological interventions are inherently social processes, requiring inclusive governance and attention to local knowledge systems.
According to Ghazoul, justice in renaturation operates on at least three interconnected levels. First, distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of restoration’s benefits and burdens. For example, when forests are restored on communal lands, it is essential that local communities—not just external actors—gain access to improved ecosystem services like clean water, soil fertility, or non-timber forest products. Second, procedural justice involves ensuring that affected stakeholders have meaningful opportunities to participate in planning and implementation. This includes recognizing indigenous land rights and incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into restoration design. Third, recognitional justice calls for acknowledging and respecting the diverse values, identities, and historical relationships that different groups hold with landscapes.
These principles are especially relevant in the context of international commitments such as the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030), which aims to prevent, halt, and reverse the degradation of ecosystems worldwide. Ghazoul has noted that achieving the decade’s goals will require more than technical expertise; it will demand deliberate attention to equity and inclusion. In a 2023 interview with the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, where he holds a visiting position, he stated that “we cannot afford ecological research that does not have clear impact” and that outcomes must “lead to positive social and environmental change.”
Ghazoul’s current research focuses on Scotland’s landscapes, marking a shift from his earlier work in tropical forests, agroforestry systems, and palm oil plantations. In Scotland, he has been developing participatory and interactive models that integrate biophysical data with social dynamics to explore how different management scenarios might unfold under varying policy choices. These tools are designed to foster dialogue among policymakers, land managers, environmental NGOs, and local communities, helping build shared understanding around complex trade-offs in land use.
One of the key challenges in applying justice-oriented restoration is balancing global environmental goals with local realities. For instance, large-scale tree-planting campaigns aimed at carbon sequestration may inadvertently displace pastoral communities or disrupt traditional grazing practices if not carefully planned. Ghazoul warns against what he calls “ecological research that ignores context,” advocating instead for approaches that are grounded in specific socio-ecological settings. His work in Scotland reflects this ethos, seeking to create tools that are both scientifically rigorous and socially responsive.
Transparency and accountability are also central to Ghazoul’s vision of just renaturation. He emphasizes the importance of clear monitoring frameworks that track not only ecological indicators—such as biodiversity recovery or carbon storage—but also social outcomes like livelihood changes, access to resources, and perceptions of fairness. Without such metrics, it becomes difficult to assess whether restoration initiatives are truly delivering on their promises or inadvertently exacerbating inequalities.
Funding mechanisms for restoration projects further complicate questions of justice. Ghazoul has pointed out that many initiatives rely on short-term grants or carbon offset schemes, which can create misaligned incentives. When funding is tied to rapid, measurable outcomes—like the number of trees planted—there is a risk of prioritizing speed and scale over quality and inclusivity. He advocates for longer-term financing models that support adaptive management and community stewardship, allowing projects to evolve based on feedback and changing conditions.
Education and capacity building also play a vital role in ensuring just outcomes. Ghazoul supports initiatives that train local facilitators in ecological monitoring and conflict resolution, empowering communities to seize ownership of restoration processes. He has collaborated with institutions across Europe and Africa to develop training programs that blend scientific knowledge with participatory methodologies, aiming to strengthen local agency in landscape governance.
Looking ahead, Ghazoul sees growing momentum for integrating justice principles into restoration policy at both national and international levels. The European Union’s Nature Restoration Law, which aims to restore 20% of the EU’s land and sea areas by 2030, includes provisions related to stakeholder engagement and sustainable financing—elements that align with his framework. However, he stresses that translating such policies into equitable outcomes on the ground will require sustained effort, vigilance, and a commitment to learning from both successes and failures.
As the world confronts interconnected crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, and social inequality, Ghazoul’s work underscores that ecological restoration cannot be separated from questions of fairness. Renaturation that is ecologically effective but socially unjust is unlikely to endure; conversely, efforts that prioritize inclusion, transparency, and mutual respect have the potential to generate lasting benefits for both people and nature. His ongoing research continues to bridge these domains, offering insights that are not only scientifically sound but also deeply relevant to the urgent task of shaping more resilient and equitable landscapes.
For updates on Jaboury Ghazoul’s current research and publications, visit his profile on the ETH Zürich website or his ResearchGate page, where his recent work on participatory landscape modeling and ecosystem management is publicly accessible.
We welcome your thoughts on this topic. Share your perspectives in the comments below and help spread the conversation by sharing this article on social media.