European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has called for “phased and gradual access” to social media for children to protect minors from online harms. This proposal aligns with recommendations from child health experts who suggest that children under 13 should only use online platforms under direct adult supervision, according to statements made by the Commission president on Monday.
The initiative targets the mental health crisis and safety risks associated with early exposure to algorithmic feeds and unregulated social interactions. By implementing a tiered approach to digital entry, the EU aims to shift the burden of safety from the individual child to the platform providers and guardians.
This move follows a broader trend of regulatory scrutiny regarding the “design-led” addiction of social media apps. The European Union is currently leveraging the Digital Services Act (DSA) to force tech giants to mitigate systemic risks, including those affecting the mental well-being of minors.
Implementing Phased Access and Age Verification
The “phased and gradual access” model suggests that digital autonomy should increase as a child matures, rather than granting full access to a platform upon reaching a single age threshold. Under this framework, younger users would encounter restricted features, limited data collection, and higher default privacy settings.
A primary challenge for this rollout is age verification. According to the European Commission, platforms must find a balance between ensuring users are of the required age and protecting the privacy of those users. Current methods, such as “self-declaration” (where a user simply enters a birthdate), are widely viewed as ineffective by regulators.
The EU is exploring more robust verification technologies, though these must comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This creates a tension between the need to verify a user’s identity to protect them and the mandate to minimize the collection of sensitive personal data from children.
The Role of the Digital Services Act in Minor Protection
The proposal by von der Leyen is supported by the enforcement mechanisms of the Digital Services Act. The DSA mandates that “Very Large Online Platforms” (VLOPs), such as TikTok and Instagram, perform annual risk assessments to identify how their interfaces may harm minors.
Under the DSA, platforms are prohibited from presenting targeted advertisements to minors based on profiling. This restriction is designed to prevent the exploitation of children’s vulnerabilities through precision-targeted marketing and addictive “infinite scroll” loops.
Failure to comply with these safety mandates can result in significant financial penalties. The European Commission has the authority to levy fines up to 6% of a company’s global annual turnover for systemic breaches of the DSA, making the protection of children a high-stakes financial liability for tech firms.
Expert Consensus on Under-13 Supervision
The recommendation that children under 13 remain under supervision is grounded in developmental psychology. Experts argue that the prefrontal cortex—the area of the brain responsible for impulse control and evaluating long-term consequences—is not sufficiently developed in early adolescence to manage the pressures of social media.
Key concerns cited by health advocates include:
- Algorithmic Rabbit Holes: The tendency of recommendation engines to push sensitive or extreme content to curious young users.
- Social Comparison: The impact of curated “highlight reels” on the self-esteem and body image of pre-teens.
- Cyberbullying: The inability of younger children to navigate complex social conflicts without adult mediation.
This “supervision-first” approach mirrors policies already being adopted in various US states and other jurisdictions, where “Age-Appropriate Design Codes” are becoming the standard for digital product development.
Comparison of Global Approaches to Youth Social Media
The EU’s approach differs from the United States and other regions in its emphasis on centralized regulation via the DSA rather than a patchwork of state-level laws. While some US states have attempted to mandate parental consent for all minors, the EU is focusing on the structural design of the platforms themselves.
| Region | Primary Mechanism | Core Focus |
|---|---|---|
| European Union | Digital Services Act (DSA) | Platform risk mitigation and systemic design |
| United States (Selected States) | State-level statutes | Parental consent and age verification |
| United Kingdom | Age-Appropriate Design Code | “Best interests of the child” design standards |
Next Steps for EU Regulation
The European Commission will now move toward defining the specific technical standards for “phased access.” This will likely involve consultations with child safety organizations and tech developers to determine what specific features should be locked or modified for different age brackets.
The next confirmed checkpoint involves the ongoing monitoring of VLOPs under the DSA. The Commission is expected to release further guidance on the “protection of minors” requirements as part of its broader effort to ensure a safe and competitive digital space.
Do you believe phased access is the right way to protect children online, or should the responsibility remain entirely with parents? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
Worth a look