Dim Lighting and Disappointing Drama: A Look at “King & Conqueror“
“King & Conqueror,” the BBC’s recent foray into the Norman Conquest, is drawing criticism for a pervasive darkness that extends beyond its historical setting. Many viewers and critics alike are finding the series visually challenging, and ultimately, dramatically underwhelming. Let’s delve into what’s causing the discontent and whether this historical epic lives up to its potential.
A Visual Struggle
The show’s commitment to recreating the pre-electric era is admirable, relying heavily on candlelight to establish atmosphere. Though, this dedication has backfired for many. It’s creating scenes that frequently dissolve into near-blackness on modern screens.
Consider the precedent set by Stanley Kubrick’s “Barry Lyndon.” Kubrick meticulously crafted the film’s lighting and even provided projectionists with instructions to ensure the intended visual experience. Sadly, “King & Conqueror” doesn’t offer viewers that same support. Your left watching on a variety of devices – TVs, laptops, phones – where the subtleties are lost, and the drama obscured.
Performances Fall Flat
Beyond the visual issues, the performances are also under scrutiny. Leading actors James Norton and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, portraying Harold Godwinson and william of Normandy respectively, are described as lacking dynamism. They appear as “bland vessels” adrift in the complex world of 11th-century politics.
Furthermore, the portrayal of their spouses, played by Gemma Chan and Clémence Poésy, is similarly muted. The characters feel “staid” and fail to ignite the screen with the passion and intrigue you’d expect from a story of this magnitude.
A Lack of Dramatic Spark
The critical consensus paints a picture of a series struggling to find its footing. Some critics have likened it to “Monty Python” rather than the gritty realism of “Game of Thrones.” Others note that the show feels “too heavy,” failing to deliver the “ripping yarn” it aims to be.
Here’s a quick breakdown of the common criticisms:
Visual Obscurity: Scenes are frequently enough too dark to fully appreciate.
Understated Performances: Key characters lack compelling depth.
Pacing Issues: The narrative feels sluggish and lacks momentum.
Tone Imbalance: the series struggles to balance historical accuracy with dramatic flair.
Is It Worth Your Time?
“King & Conqueror” had the potential to be a captivating historical drama. However, its execution falls short. If you’re a dedicated history buff, you might find some value in its attempt at authenticity. But be prepared to strain your eyes and potentially feel underwhelmed by the overall experience.
Currently, you can stream “King & Conqueror” on BBC iPlayer. Consider whether the potential visual challenges and lukewarm reception are worth your investment.
