The Stalled Pursuit of Peace: Navigating the Golan Heights Impasse in Israeli-Syrian Relations
For decades, the prospect of normalized relations between Israel and Syria has remained tantalizingly out of reach. Recent diplomatic overtures, spearheaded by Syrian President Bashar al-Sharaa, haven’t broken the deadlock, largely due to fundamental disagreements over the Golan Heights and security concerns. This analysis delves into the complexities hindering progress, examining the positions of both Damascus and Jerusalem, the role of external actors, and the path forward for a lasting peace.
The current impasse stems from deeply entrenched positions. Israel, under Prime Minister Netanyahu, remains steadfast in its refusal to withdraw to the pre-2024 demarcation line and insists on UN-regulated demilitarization of the Southern Syrian Region. These demands, perceived as maximalist, haven’t softened despite Sharaa’s attempts at engagement.
Syria, understandably, views the Israeli occupation of the Golan Heights as a historical grievance and a core impediment to any normalization. Public sentiment remains overwhelmingly opposed to israeli presence, severely limiting the Sharaa goverment’s adaptability on territorial concessions. Damascus simply cannot reconcile with Israel – or Washington – without addressing this critical issue, and risks destabilizing the regime if it attempts to do so.
This situation is further complicated by the regional geopolitical landscape. The previous U.S.management’s “blanket” support for israel, without preconditions, arguably diminished the leverage of key regional players like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Türkiye. This dynamic allowed for more rigid negotiating positions from Israel,knowing a key ally had its back.
The Abraham Accords, while reshaping the Middle East, haven’t provided a viable framework for Israeli-Syrian normalization. Syria has categorically rejected joining the Accords until Israel withdraws from the Golan Heights, highlighting the centrality of this issue.
The Golan Heights question isn’t merely about land; it’s about sovereignty, security, and national identity.Syria’s economic fragility further complicates matters, as the country is ill-equipped to withstand renewed conflict. any sustainable solution must acknowledge these realities.
A path forward requires a shift in approach. The Trump administration’s willingness to prioritize Israeli security interests, while effective in other contexts, has proven counterproductive in this case. Genuine confidence-building measures, rather than unilateral demands, are essential.
Specifically, progress hinges on constructing non-coercive frameworks that address the Golan heights’ sovereignty through equitable settlements. This necessitates substantive israeli engagement on territorial status and phased withdrawal mechanisms. Simply put, a lasting peace requires Israel to demonstrate a genuine commitment to addressing Syria’s legitimate concerns.
About the Authors:
* Kabir Taneja is Deputy Director and Fellow, Middle East, Strategic Studies Program, Observer Research Foundation.
* Samidha Jain is a Research Intern at the Observer Research Foundation.
Source: this article is adapted from the original publication by the Observer Research Foundation: https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/the-golan-heights-from-demilitarisation-to-a-pursuit-of-peace
