Home / Entertainment / Gulf Ban on Ranveer Singh’s ‘Dhurandhar’: India-Pakistan Trade & Film Politics

Gulf Ban on Ranveer Singh’s ‘Dhurandhar’: India-Pakistan Trade & Film Politics

Gulf Ban on Ranveer Singh’s ‘Dhurandhar’: India-Pakistan Trade & Film Politics

The Gulf’s Troubling ⁤Tilt:‍ Pakistan, Censorship, and India’s Diminished Influence

the relationship between the Gulf nations and Pakistan is a long-standing one, built⁣ on decades ​of strategic alliances and shared interests. However, recent‌ actions suggest a troubling​ pattern: a willingness to prioritize ​these ties over substantial economic‍ and demographic realities involving India. This isn’t simply about film ⁤bans; it’s a ‌signal of ⁤shifting power dynamics and a concerning susceptibility⁢ to propaganda.

Pakistan’s Entrenched Influence in the Gulf

For years, Pakistan has ‍cultivated‍ deep connections within the‍ Gulf Cooperation ‌Council (GCC). These relationships are multifaceted and extend‌ beyond mere diplomacy. Consider these⁤ key⁣ factors:

* Saudi Arabia remains ⁢Pakistan’s closest and most enduring ally.
* The United Arab Emirates ⁢stands⁤ as the second-largest economic investor ​in Pakistan.
* Pakistan has a proven ‌track ‌record of providing military training to the⁣ armed forces of Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain.
* Pakistan ‌actively leverages its economic, military, religious, and political ties to shape narratives within the Gulf⁢ region.

This established ​network grants Pakistan meaningful influence, allowing it to exert pressure – and, as we’ll see, ⁢censorship – in ways that‍ directly impact other nations.

India’s ⁢Overlooked Stake in the Region

India’s⁤ presence in the Gulf is‌ undeniably massive,yet it appears to be​ increasingly disregarded. The economic ​and human ties are substantial, dwarfing Pakistan’s influence in ⁤many respects. Let’s look at the numbers:

* ⁢ India’s annual bilateral trade with Gulf nations‌ exceeds $200 billion.
* Over 30% ​of ‍India’s crucial oil imports originate from Gulf countries.
* Approximately 9​ million Indian expatriates​ reside in Gulf nations, representing 15% of the region’s 60‍ million population.
* ⁢ ⁣These‌ Indian ⁤workers collectively remit $45-50 ⁤billion annually to ​India, a vital contribution​ to the Indian economy.

Also Read:  Icons Week Confirmed: Strictly Continues After Daly & Winkleman Exit

Despite this ​overwhelming economic and demographic weight, recent events demonstrate​ a concerning disregard for India’s interests.

The​ Pattern ‍of Censorship: Silencing Films‌ Exposing Terrorism

The recent ban of a⁤ film exposing terrorism across several Gulf nations⁤ is not ⁤an isolated incident. It’s part of a disturbing trend where Pakistan systematically utilizes its Gulf connections to ⁤suppress narratives that⁢ portray its alleged involvement in supporting⁤ terrorism. You might be surprised to learn that the following ⁣films have previously faced bans:

  1. Uri: The Surgical Strike
  2. Fighter
  3. Sky‍ Force
  4. The Diplomat
  5. Article 370
  6. Tiger 3
  7. The ⁤Kashmir Files

This coordinated censorship raises serious questions about⁢ the influence Pakistan wields and the willingness​ of Gulf nations to accommodate its ‌demands. It’s a betrayal‍ of the millions of ‍Indian expatriates who contribute⁢ considerably to⁤ these economies.

A Global Paradox: Bans on expression

The situation is further intricate‌ when viewed through ​a‌ broader lens of global restrictions. Ironically, while‌ Gulf nations ban films ‍critical of ‌terrorism, ​Western nations often restrict religious⁣ expression.⁤

* Austria recently enacted legislation banning the hijab ‌for ⁣girls under ⁣14 in schools.
*‌ ​‍ Currently, 24 countries worldwide have implemented full or partial bans on the ⁤burqa.
* Italy has introduced ⁢legislation prohibiting the ⁣burqa, niqab, and hijab ‌in public spaces.
* Even several Muslim-majority nations, including Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and⁤ Tunisia, have imposed⁣ restrictions on the burqa.

This highlights a complex and often contradictory⁢ landscape of bans, raising ⁢questions about the motivations‌ behind these restrictions.

America’s Role: A Leading Imposer of Sanctions

The irony deepens⁣ when‌ considering ⁤the United States’ own extensive use of ‌sanctions. America is,in fact,a world leader in this ⁢practise.

Also Read:  2025's Biggest Gaming Disappointments: Worst Games on Metacritic (Bubsy, MindsEye & More)

* The U.S. imposed 3,135 new ​sanctions‍ in 2024 alone.
* ‍ The European Union imposed over 10,000 sanctions ⁢between 2022-2025.
* ⁢⁤ Russia currently⁣ faces over 24,0

Leave a Reply