Denver School Board Weighs Censure of Director John Youngquist Amidst Escalating Conflicts
The Denver Public Schools (DPS) board is considering a rare and meaningful step: the censure of Director John Youngquist. This action comes after months of escalating tensions, accusations of retaliation, and concerns over his conduct toward district staff. Here’s a extensive look at the situation,the key players,and what this means for the future of DPS.
A History of Friction
The current conflict isn’t isolated. It stems from a series of disagreements and accusations that have unfolded over the past year. Youngquist himself alleges he faced retaliation from DPS leadership, including Superintendent Alex Marrero, after raising concerns about school safety prior to the tragic shooting at East High School in 2023.
However, the board’s concerns center on how Youngquist has pursued his inquiries and interacted with staff.
Board Criticism & Accusations of Improper Conduct
In January, board members publicly criticized Youngquist for allegedly violating Colorado’s open meeting laws. while specifics where initially limited, three directors - Xóchitl ”Sochi” Gaytán, Michelle Quattlebaum, and Scott Esserman - later accused him of “behavior unbecoming of a board member toward DPS staff” throughout 2024.
Specifically, Youngquist is accused of:
* Creating a toxic work surroundings.
* Undermining DPS leaders.
* Displaying racial insensitivity toward staff.
* Persistent attempts to secure full compensation for his board duties.
Youngquist denies these accusations, dismissing Marrero’s claims as a “personal attack” and stating he has no ambition to become superintendent. He acknowledges friction with senior staff, specifically naming Chief of Staff Deborah Staten and General Counsel Aaron Thompson.
Email Exchanges Reveal Deep-Seated Tensions
The conflict became notably public this spring when Superintendent Marrero sent a scathing email to board President Carrie Olson detailing his grievances against Youngquist. Emails previously reported by The Denver Post reveal a contentious relationship between Youngquist and Thompson.
Thompson reportedly felt Youngquist’s questioning was driven by “unexamined biases,” noting the director frequently interacted with employees of color, including himself, Staten, and Marrero. This dynamic adds a layer of complexity to the situation, raising questions about perception and interaction.
What Does Censure Mean?
Censure is a formal rebuke, the strongest disciplinary action the board can take short of removal. It’s a public statement of disapproval, signaling the board’s serious concerns about a member’s conduct.
It’s critically important to note: the board does not have the authority to remove Youngquist from his position.
Precedent & Cost
This isn’t the first time the DPS board has considered censure. In 2021, former Director Tay Anderson was censured following an investigation into online interactions with a student. That investigation, though, proved costly – exceeding $190,000 – and didn’t substantiate the most serious allegations made against Anderson.
The board will likely weigh the financial and reputational costs of a similar investigation before proceeding.
Why This Matters to You
As a member of the Denver community,this situation impacts you and your children. A dysfunctional school board can hinder progress on critical issues like student achievement,school safety,and resource allocation. A stable and effective board is essential for ensuring a high-quality education for all DPS students.
Looking Ahead
The situation remains fluid. The board is currently deliberating on whether to formally censure youngquist. this is a developing story,and The Denver post will continue to provide updates as they become available.
Stay informed:
* Sign up for The Denver Post’s Mile High Roundup email newsletter for more Colorado news.
* Follow The Denver Post’s coverage of the DPS board.
Disclaimer: This article is based on reporting from The Denver Post and other publicly available sources as of [Date of Article Creation].
