![Louder Commercials Banned: New Law in [State Name] Protects Viewers](https://static0.howtogeekimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/shutterstock_1966720738.jpg?w=1600&h=900&fit=crop "Louder Commercials Banned: New Law in [State Name] Protects Viewers")
California Declares War on Ear-Splitting Streaming Ads: A Deep Dive into SB 576 and the Future of Ad Volume
By [Your Name/Organization Name – Establish Authority] – October 7, 2025
For years, streaming services have been a haven for entertainment, but also a source of a surprisingly irritating problem: commercials that are dramatically louder than the shows and movies we’re watching. That’s about to change in California, thanks to the newly signed Senate Bill 576. This landmark legislation promises a more consistent, and considerably less jarring, viewing experience for millions – and could set a national precedent. But what exactly does SB 576 do, why now, and what does it mean for the future of advertising? We break down the details, the backstory, and the potential ripple effects.
The Problem: Why Streaming Ads Feel So Much Louder
Anyone who regularly switches between streaming and traditional television knows the feeling: your comfortably enjoying a program at a reasonable volume, then bam – a commercial hits that feels like a sonic assault. This isn’t accidental. For over a decade, streaming services operated under a different set of rules than broadcast and cable TV.
In 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) implemented the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act. This crucial piece of legislation aimed to prevent networks from intentionally boosting commercial volume to grab attention. The CALM Act worked – significantly reducing the volume disparity between programming and ads on traditional TV.
However, the CALM Act had a loophole: it didn’t apply to the rapidly emerging world of streaming. As streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, and Paramount+ exploded in popularity, they were free to ignore these volume regulations. And, predictably, many did. The result? A frustrating and often disruptive experience for viewers. This wasn’t just a minor annoyance; it was a genuine quality-of-life issue.
SB 576: Leveling the Playing Field
California’s SB 576 directly addresses this disparity. Effective July 1, 2026, the bill extends the protections of the CALM Act to all video streaming services serving California consumers. This means streaming platforms will be legally required to ensure that commercial audio levels are consistent with the programming content. In essence, they can no longer intentionally make ads louder to shock or startle viewers.
Governor Gavin Newsom succinctly captured the sentiment behind the bill, stating, “we heard Californians loud and clear, and what’s clear is that they don’t want commercials at a volume any louder than the level at which they were previously enjoying a program.” SB 576 isn’t about eliminating commercials; it’s about ensuring they don’t hijack your viewing experience.
The Unexpected Inspiration: A baby’s Sleep (and Tired Parents)
The story behind SB 576 is surprisingly relatable. The initial impetus for the bill came from a very personal place: a legislative aide to Senator Thomas Umberg, the bill’s author, found their newborn repeatedly awakened by excessively loud streaming ads.
Senator Umberg eloquently explained the broader motivation: “inspired by every exhausted parent who’s finally gotten a baby to sleep, only to have a blaring streaming ad undo all that hard work.” His aide’s wife further highlighted the issue, noting that even with the TV volume set low enough for comfortable viewing, the commercials were often “ear-piercing,” sometimes requiring subtitles to be understood. This anecdote powerfully illustrates the real-world impact of the problem SB 576 aims to solve.
Industry Pushback and Technical Challenges
Predictably, the streaming industry initially opposed the bill. Groups like the Motion Picture Association (MPA) argued that controlling ad volume is significantly more complex for streaming platforms than for traditional broadcasters. They pointed to the real-time nature of ad insertion and the diverse sources of commercials as key challenges.
This argument isn’t without merit. Managing audio levels across a vast, dynamic digital ecosystem is technically more demanding than controlling volume on a traditional broadcast signal. Though, Senator Umberg effectively countered this claim, arguing that if streaming services can engineer ways to increase ad volume for impact, they certainly possess the technology to decrease it for a more pleasant viewing experience. This highlights a crucial point: the issue isn’t technical impossibility, but rather a intentional choice to prioritize attention-grabbing tactics over user experience.
What Does This Mean for the Future? Beyond California
While SB 576 is currently a California law, its
