Megan Thee Stallion Wins Legal Battle against Online Harasser, Setting Precedent for Defamation Cases
Megan Thee Stallion continues to actively combat online harassment, recently securing a meaningful legal victory against blogger Milagro Gramz. A judge has ordered Gramz, legally Milagro Elizabeth Cooper, to pay $5,000 in attorney fees to Megan’s legal team. This ruling underscores the growing legal ramifications for online defamation, notably in cases involving public figures.
The Core of the Dispute
The lawsuit stems from a campaign of online harassment and alleged cyberbullying directed at Megan Thee Stallion following the 2020 shooting involving rapper Tory Lanez. Lanez was convicted in 2022 and is currently serving a 10-year sentence for the incident. Megan’s legal team argues that Cooper acted as a mouthpiece for Lanez, spreading false and damaging claims about the rapper online.Specifically, the lawsuit alleges Cooper participated in a pattern of defamation by amplifying lies concerning the shooting and Megan’s account of events.These claims ranged from accusations that Megan fabricated the story to assertions about the identity of the shooter.
Legal Proceedings and Key Findings
The legal battle has been unfolding as late 2024.Recently,Cooper underwent a deposition on July 14th. The $5,000 payment ordered by the judge is intended to cover the costs associated with obtaining Cooper’s digital communications.
Megan’s attorneys are seeking access to Cooper’s Discord, WhatsApp, and iMessage records.This is to gather further evidence supporting the defamation claims. Thay’ve expressed concerns about potential tampering with these records, a matter still awaiting a judicial ruling.
Why This Matters to You
This case is crucial for several reasons. It demonstrates that online actions do have real-world consequences. You should understand that spreading false information, especially with malicious intent, can lead to legal repercussions.
Here’s a breakdown of the key takeaways:
Defamation is actionable: False statements that harm someone’s reputation can be the basis for a lawsuit.
Online platforms aren’t shields: The internet doesn’t provide immunity from legal obligation.
Celebrities are protected: public figures have the same rights to protect their reputations as anyone else.
Evidence is crucial: Digital records like texts and messages can be vital in defamation cases.
Megan Thee Stallion’s Response
Megan Thee Stallion has been vocal about the harassment she’s faced. In a 2024 post on social media,she expressed her frustration,stating she wouldn’t tolerate further attacks. She warned those involved that their actions would have consequences.
This legal win represents a significant step in holding online harassers accountable. It sends a clear message that spreading misinformation and engaging in cyberbullying will not be tolerated.
What’s Next?
Cooper has 30 days from July 25, 2025, to fulfill the payment order. The judge’s decision regarding the potential tampering of digital records is still pending. This case is likely to set a precedent for future defamation lawsuits involving online harassment, potentially empowering other victims to seek legal recourse.
Ultimately, Megan thee Stallion’s proactive approach to combating online abuse is not only protecting her own reputation but also contributing to a safer online habitat for everyone.
