colombia’s Military Justice System: A Persistent Obstacle to Justice for Human rights Violations
For decades, Colombia has grappled with a deeply entrenched issue: the inappropriate jurisdiction of its military justice system (JPM) over crimes that should be investigated and prosecuted by civilian courts. This practice, repeatedly flagged by international human rights standards and Colombian constitutional law, continues to impede access to justice for victims of human rights violations and crimes under international law, fostering a climate of impunity.A recent report by Amnesty International underscores the urgency of addressing this systemic problem, detailing ongoing failures and offering concrete recommendations for reform.
The Core Conflict: Military Justice over Civilians and Serious Crimes
International legal norms are unequivocal: military judges should not preside over trials involving civilians, allegations of human rights abuses, or crimes falling under international law. However, in Colombia, a significant contradiction exists. The National Police, officially designated as a civilian body, remains subject to inquiry and trial within the JPM. This fundamentally undermines the principle of impartiality and raises serious concerns about the fairness and effectiveness of the justice system.
This isn’t a new advancement. Despite two decades of legal and constitutional reforms aimed at clarifying criminal jurisdiction, the JPM consistently oversteps its boundaries. As Ana Piquer, Americas Director at Amnesty international, states, “The jurisdiction of the military criminal justice system must be strictly limited to crimes committed by active duty military personnel. it cannot be extended to human rights violations or civilians, in accordance with international standards.” This continued encroachment prevents Colombia from fulfilling its obligation to guarantee access to justice for victims.
A History of Impunity: From Enforced Disappearances to Protest-Related Violence
The report meticulously documents the long-standing nature of this problem.Cases dating back to the 1980s, such as the enforced disappearances of Luis Fernando Lalinde and Nydia Erika Bautista at the hands of the Colombian military, remain unresolved, investigated initially - and often exclusively – by the very forces implicated in the crimes. Four decades later, impunity prevails.
More recently, the report examines the handling of cases involving protesters injured or killed by members of the National Police during demonstrations over the past two decades.Despite consistent rulings from Colombian courts directing these cases to the ordinary justice system, the JPM continues to improperly assume jurisdiction, creating significant delays and hindering the pursuit of accountability. this pattern demonstrates a systemic bias and a disregard for established legal precedent.
data-Driven analysis: A Systemic Issue Confirmed
Amnesty International‘s findings are grounded in rigorous research. The report draws upon information provided by the Attorney General’s Office, the JPM, and the Constitutional Court, alongside a systematic review of 398 cases of jurisdictional conflicts referred to the Constitutional Court between February 2021 and October 2024. This complete analysis confirms that the improper assertion of jurisdiction by the JPM is not isolated but rather a pervasive and ongoing issue.
why This Matters: The Erosion of trust and the Cycle of Violence
The consequences of allowing the JPM to investigate and prosecute these crimes are far-reaching. It erodes public trust in the justice system, perpetuates a cycle of violence, and denies victims the closure and redress they deserve. The lengthy and complex process of seeking justice, frequently enough requiring the navigation of institutional barriers designed to protect perpetrators, further exacerbates the suffering of victims and their families.
Amnesty International’s recommendations: A Path Towards Genuine Accountability
To address this critical issue, Amnesty International urges the Colombian state to take decisive action:
* Constitutional Reform: Explicitly exclude the National Police from the jurisdiction of the JPM through constitutional amendment.
* Legislative Clarification: Enact legislative reforms to definitively state that the JPM’s jurisdiction does not extend to potential human rights violations or crimes under international law.
* Preventive Measures: Implement measures to prevent the initiation of investigations within the JPM for these types of crimes and ensure the swift transfer of any existing cases to the ordinary criminal justice system.
* Comprehensive Training: Provide mandatory and comprehensive training to judges, prosecutors, and other justice system operators – both within the JPM and the ordinary courts – on applicable international standards and Colombian constitutional jurisprudence.
Moving forward: A Commitment to International Standards
Colombia has a legal and moral obligation to uphold international human rights standards and ensure accountability for past and present abuses. Addressing the inappropriate jurisdiction of the JPM is a crucial step towards achieving this goal. Failure to do so will not only continue to deny justice to victims but also undermine the country’s efforts to build a lasting peace and strengthen the rule of law.
For further information or to arrange an interview, please contact: [email protected]
**Key improvements and E-E-A-T considerations
