Okay,I’ve analyzed the HTML snippet you provided. Here’s a breakdown of what it contains, focusing on the key elements and their purpose.I’ll categorize it for clarity.
1. Social Sharing Buttons:
This section defines the social media sharing options for the article.
* Twitter: The <a> tag with target="_blank" is intended to open a new tab/window when clicked, directing the user to Twitter to share the article.The href attribute is commented out, but the JavaScript onclick event handler suggests it was designed to dynamically construct a tweet URL with the article’s title and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette‘s Twitter handle (@PittsburghPG). The icon icon-x-twitter is the Twitter logo.
* Email: The <a> tag with id="tipafriend" and alt="Email" is likely linked to a javascript function (also commented out) that would open an email composition window pre-filled with the article link. The icon icon-envelope is the email logo.
* android Text/Share: The <a> tag with icon icon-bubble-dots3 is highly likely intended to open the native Android share sheet, allowing users to share the article through various apps installed on their device.
* Comments: The <a> tag with alt="Comments" links to a comment section for the article. It includes a span element (pgevoke-socialshareheader-buttons-commentscount) which is likely dynamically populated with the number of comments. The icon icon-comment is the comment logo.
2. Header/Branding:
* pgevoke-socialshareheader-sideicon pgevoke-socialshareheader-sideicon-pub valignfix: This <a> tag likely contains the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette logo and links back to the homepage.
3. Navigation/Sidebar (pgevoke-slidemenu):
This section defines a sliding menu, likely a sidebar, with various navigation options.
* Account: A section for user account-related links (login, profile, etc.).
* Sections: A list of different sections of the website (e.g., News, Sports, Buisness).
* Other: A category for miscellaneous links.
* Classifieds: A link to the classifieds section.
* Contact Us / FAQ: links to contact information and frequently asked questions.
4. Advertising/Placeholder:
* <!-- pg.ads.x51-wallpaper / v20180411_1244 --> and related comments: These are placeholders for advertising code, specifically a wallpaper ad unit. The comments indicate the ad code was previously present but has been removed or is conditionally loaded.
5. Footer (Partial):
* The comment <!-- Not using full footer --> suggests that this page doesn’t use the complete website footer.
6.JavaScript and Analytics:
this section contains numerous comments indicating the inclusion of various JavaScript files and analytics tracking codes. Many of these are commented out or marked as removed, suggesting they were previously used but are no longer active. Here’s a summary:
* Piano Buttons: Likely related to a subscription or paywall system (Piano is a common platform for this).
* Analytics: A wide range of analytics tracking codes are mentioned:
* analytics.newsbeat
* A.B.D. (likely an internal analytics system)
* analytics.pg (now using pg.analytics.aam)
* pg.analytics.civicscience
* pg.analytics.aam-certifier
* pg.analytics.google-analytics
* Gigya: A customer identity management platform. The code related to Gigya is commented out.
* Krux: A data management platform. The code related to Krux is present.
7. Email Share Styling:
* The <style> block defines CSS rules for a hidden email share form (#pgevoke-tipform). This form would likely appear when the “Email” share button is clicked.
8. Macro Includes:
* <l t o : macro name="pgevoke.includes.email-share"> and <l t o : macro name="pgevoke.components.analytics-block">: These lines suggest the use of a templating system (likely a custom one called “pgevoke”) to include reusable code blocks for email sharing and analytics.
Key Observations and Potential Issues:
* Commented-out Code: A meaningful amount of code is commented out. This suggests that the website has undergone changes, and older features or tracking mechanisms have been removed. It’s good practice to remove unused code entirely to keep the codebase clean.
* JavaScript in HTML: The onclick event handlers directly in the HTML are generally considered less maintainable than attaching event listeners using JavaScript.
* Dynamic Content: The use of placeholders like <<<=theobj.link>>> and <<<=theobj.title>>> indicates that the content is dynamically generated by a server-side script.
* Templating System: The use of <l t o : macro name="..."> suggests a custom templating system.
* Outdated Comments: Some comments indicate code was removed in 2017, 2018, or 2020, suggesting the code hasn’t been thoroughly updated recently.
* Accessibility: The alt attributes on the <a> tags are good for accessibility, but it’s significant to ensure the icons themselves are also accessible (e.g., using ARIA attributes).
this HTML snippet represents a portion of a news website’s page structure, focusing on social sharing, navigation, and analytics.It appears to be a somewhat older codebase with some outdated elements and a reliance on a custom templating system.
