Nvidia & AMD’s Revenue share with the US Government: A Deep Dive into Chip Export Controls
The world of semiconductor technology is currently navigating a complex geopolitical landscape. Recent developments reveal that Nvidia and AMD have reached an unusual agreement with the U.S. government: a 15% revenue share on specific chip sales to China.This arrangement, born from export control restrictions, highlights the strategic importance of advanced computing and artificial intelligence (AI) technology. This article provides a extensive analysis of this situation, exploring the context, implications, and future outlook for the semiconductor industry. We’ll delve into the specifics of the deal, the chips involved, and the broader ramifications for US-China tech relations.
Did You Know? The initial demand from President Trump was for a 20% revenue share, demonstrating the aggressive stance taken by the US government to maintain control over advanced technology exports.
The Genesis of the Agreement: Export Controls and National Security
In April, the Trump governance implemented restrictions on the sale of advanced computer chips to China, citing national security concerns. This move aimed to limit China’s access to technologies crucial for developing advanced AI capabilities and perhaps bolstering its military. however, Nvidia and AMD subsequently secured permission to resume sales of the H20 and MI308 chips – albeit under the condition of the 15% revenue share.
This situation underscores the delicate balance between national security interests and the economic realities of the global semiconductor market. The US aims to prevent the transfer of technology that could be used to undermine its strategic advantage, while concurrently allowing American companies to participate in the lucrative Chinese market. The core issue revolves around preventing China from achieving technological parity in critical areas like AI and high-performance computing.
Understanding the chips: H20 and MI308
The chips at the center of this agreement, the Nvidia H20 and AMD MI308, are specifically designed for AI growth and high-performance computing. While described by President Trump as “essentially old chips,” they still possess meaningful capabilities.
Here’s a quick comparison:
| Chip | Manufacturer | Primary Use | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| H20 | Nvidia | AI Training & Inference | High bandwidth memory, optimized for data center workloads |
| MI308 | AMD | High-Performance Computing | Designed for scientific simulations and data analytics |
Pro Tip: Understanding the specific capabilities of these chips is crucial for assessing the impact of the export controls. while not the most cutting-edge technology, they still represent a significant advancement in computing power.
The decision to allow the sale of these specific chips, rather than completely halting all exports, suggests a strategic calculation by the US government. It allows American companies to maintain a presence in the chinese market while still limiting the transfer of the most advanced technologies.
The Implications for Nvidia, AMD, and the US economy
The 15% revenue share represents a significant cost for Nvidia and AMD. While the companies have publicly stated their commitment to adhering to US export regulations, the financial impact of this agreement is undeniable. Nvidia, in a statement to the Associated Press, expressed hope that export controls would allow the US to “compete in China and worldwide,” emphasizing the importance of maintaining a competitive edge in the global AI landscape.
Strategic Question: Do you think this revenue-sharing model is a lasting long-term solution for managing technology exports, or will it lead to further complications and trade disputes?
Beyond the direct financial impact on the companies, this agreement has broader implications for the US economy. The semiconductor industry is a vital component of the US economy, and restricting exports could potentially stifle innovation and growth. However, proponents of the export controls argue that protecting national security is paramount, even if it comes at an economic cost.Recent research from the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) highlights the industry’s contribution of over $250 billion to the US economy in 2023.[https://www.semiconductors.org/](https://www.semiconductors.org
![Qatar & Peace: Why the US Should Strengthen Ties | [Publication Name]](https://i0.wp.com/cdn-live.foreignaffairs.com/sites/default/files/styles/social_share/public/images/2025/12/18/2025-10-10T144325Z_1726144100_RC219HAWY7T9_RTRMADP_3_USA-QATAR.JPG?resize=150%2C100&ssl=1 "Qatar & Peace: Why the US Should Strengthen Ties | [Publication Name]")
