![Raluca Csernatoni Interview: Insights from a [Raluca’s Profession/Industry] Leader](https://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Image-by-Raluca-Csernatoni.jpg "Raluca Csernatoni Interview: Insights from a [Raluca’s Profession/Industry] Leader")
Navigating Tech Sovereignty, AI Governance, adn the Future of International Relations
The European Union stands at a critical juncture. The appointment of a new Commissioner for Internal Market, a role pivotal in shaping the EU’s digital future, presents both opportunity and challenge. While the ambition of “tech sovereignty” is laudable, its success hinges not on rhetoric, but on demonstrable progress: increased pooled funding, harmonized supply-chain regulations, and a unified European stance on complex issues like AI governance. this new Commissioner, unlike her predecessor, signals a preference for a lighter regulatory touch, aiming to foster innovation alongside oversight – a delicate balance crucial for nurturing a thriving European tech ecosystem.Ultimately, the true measure of success will be quantifiable results, industry collaboration, and sustained political commitment extending beyond the Commissioner’s office. The EU’s recent move towards more flexible tech regulations, though, introduces a potential conflict wiht the commissioner’s democracy portfolio, demanding a compelling demonstration that rapid technological advancement can coexist with the protection of democratic values and human rights.
Adapting AI Governance for an Uncertain Future
The advancement and deployment of Artificial Intelligence demand a governance framework that isn’t static, but inherently adaptable. We must recognize that technology and society are not separate entities, but co-constitutive forces, meaning regulations must evolve in tandem with both technological advancements and societal shifts. The EU’s AI Act, while a significant step, needs to be embedded with reflexive and participatory mechanisms to ensure its continued relevance.
This requires institutionalizing anticipatory governance – a proactive approach built on broad,interdisciplinary expertise. A permanent Foresight and futures Board, comprised of historians of technology, sociologists, security analysts, legal scholars, artists, scientists, civil society representatives, and engineers, could proactively identify potential risks and opportunities. This board should conduct regular “red-team” exercises, scenario workshops, and “wild-card” stress tests on emerging AI architectures.
However, foresight cannot remain confined to expert circles. Robust public debate is essential, particularly concerning the implications of dual-use AI systems. This necessitates a complementary “bottom-up” approach, incorporating structured public forums, sustained engagement with labor unions and civil society organizations, collaboration with educational institutions, and detailed ethnographic reports from real-world AI deployment sites. By embedding these iterative, multi-viewpoint mechanisms, the EU can transform potential crises into valuable regulatory data, ensuring a responsive and resilient AI governance framework.
Advice for the Next Generation of International Relations Scholars
To aspiring scholars of International Relations, I offer a few observations gleaned from my own experience. First, and perhaps most importantly, treat technology not as a mere backdrop to world politics, but as a constitutive force shaping it. The coming power struggles will be defined by control over semiconductor supply chains, cloud computing standards, and algorithmic infrastructure, not solely by customary diplomatic channels. Therefore, cultivate “tech literacy” – dedicate time to understanding the intricacies of AI, quantum technologies, advanced chips, biotechnology, and data flows, and how they are reshaping knowledge, sovereignty, economy, labor, and security.
Simultaneously,maintain the critical instincts inherent to the discipline of IR.Constantly question: who benefits from these technological advancements,who is excluded,and how do new technologies reinforce existing hierarchies or create new power dynamics?
embrace engaged scholarship. The future of IR lies in collaborative, interdisciplinary, and praxis-oriented projects that bring together academics, activists, artists, policymakers, and practitioners to co-design research questions and policy interventions. While academic publication remains significant, co-creating ethical audits, policy recommendations, diplomatic outreach strategies, and accessible public explanations are equally valuable contributions.
crucially, recognize that the proliferation of ubiquitous AI models is fundamentally challenging core cognitive and social norms within scholarship itself. We are entering a new political economy of knowledge production, where algorithmic assistance coexists with human-driven analysis, and where the very definition of “authoritative expertise” is being redefined. Navigating this evolving landscape will be paramount for the next generation of IR scholars.
