Looming Changes to Public Service Loan Forgiveness Face Legal Scrutiny, Spark Concerns of Political Manipulation
Teh Biden administration‘s anticipated revisions to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program are already drawing fire, with legal challenges widely expected. Experts warn these changes could represent a important overreach of government power, potentially denying loan forgiveness to individuals working in fields disfavored by the current administration.
A Potential Weaponization of Loan Forgiveness
The core concern revolves around proposed rules that could disqualify borrowers employed by organizations deemed to be pursuing “ample illegal purposes.” This vague wording raises alarm bells, as it could be broadly interpreted to exclude individuals providing essential services.
“I’m sure there’s going to be a lawsuit against it, but still,” said legal expert Partridge, “it’s a major abuse of power for the government to wield this tool to advance its political ends.” The potential impact is far-reaching, targeting those who have already been in the crosshairs of previous administrations.
Specifically, the changes could affect individuals working in areas like:
Immigrant legal services: Providing legal aid to immigrants could be construed as supporting “illegal purposes.”
Gender-affirming care: Organizations offering gender-affirming healthcare may face scrutiny.
Protest support: Even seemingly minor infractions like trespassing during protests could disqualify borrowers.
This administration is essentially wielding the power of the federal financial aid system to advance its ideological goals. The ambiguity of the “substantial illegal purposes” clause further expands the potential for exclusion.
Echoes of the Past: A History of Using Debt as Control
This isn’t the first time the cost of education has been leveraged for political ends.Looking back to the Vietnam War era, then-California Governor Ronald Reagan slashed funding for public universities amidst campus protests.
His rationale? He feared an “educated proletariat” and believed higher education should be reserved for a select few. As Reagan’s education advisor, Roger A.Freeman, stated in 1969, “We are in danger of producing an educated proletariat. That’s dynamite!”
This past precedent underscores a troubling pattern. As legal scholar Yu points out, “There is a very robust history about how debt has been used as a lever of social control.”
The Broader Implications for Borrowers
Student debt, Yu argues, can be a powerful force for maintaining the status quo. “[Student debt] is a force that can keep people in place, keep people in line.”
By selectively denying loan forgiveness, the administration could effectively punish individuals working in fields it deems undesirable while rewarding those in favored sectors. This creates a system where career choices are influenced not by passion or public need, but by the potential for financial relief.
What You Need to Know
If you are currently pursuing PSLF, or considering it, here’s what you should do:
Stay informed: monitor updates from the Department of Education regarding the proposed rule changes.
Document everything: keep detailed records of your employment and the services your association provides.
Seek legal counsel: If you believe you might potentially be affected by the changes, consult with an attorney specializing in student loan law.
The future of PSLF hangs in the balance. These proposed changes raise serious questions about the fairness and integrity of the program, and the potential for political interference in the financial lives of public servants.
Resources:
The Intercept: Abortion, Trans Health Care Doctors Targeted
The Intercept: Weaponizing the Cost of Education
The Intercept: Student Loans and Debt – A Historical Outlook
The Intercept: Privacy Policy
* The Intercept: Terms of Use
