Home / Tech / Superintelligence Aftermath: Navigating Life After AI Surpasses Humans

Superintelligence Aftermath: Navigating Life After AI Surpasses Humans

Superintelligence Aftermath: Navigating Life After AI Surpasses Humans
Louis‍ Rosenberg,⁤ Unanimous A.I. 2025-08-13 ⁣18:45:00

The‍ Double-Edged Sword of AI Assistants:​ Will They Empower⁤ or Erode Human ​Confidence?

Imagine a future⁢ where ‍a discreet AI companion⁤ resides‍ in your ear, subtly enhancing your every interaction.⁤ This superpower could ensure you never stumble over a name, always deliver a witty response, and instantly recognize deception in others. However, this isn’t a ⁤solo advantage. Everyone around you would ​possess a similar AI, prompting a essential question: are you connecting with the ⁢person before⁣ you, ‌or their ⁢AI proxy? Many experts ⁤predict body-worn AI assistants will amplify ⁤our feelings of capability and power.‍ but this ⁣outcome isn’t guaranteed.⁣ These technologies could equally diminish your self-assurance and sense of impact. Human intelligence ​is, after all, a core element of our identity, something ⁣we inherently value. Consider the possibility of constantly deferring ​to an AI, feeling intellectually overshadowed.Is this​ true empowerment, or‌ simply having your experiences constantly “botsplained” in real-time?

The Risk of replacing, Not Augmenting

Throughout my career, I’ve dedicated myself to building technologies that expand human abilities. From pioneering ‌work in augmented reality ⁢to developing ⁢conversational ‌agents that​ boost‌ team ⁣performance, ⁤I firmly believe technology can be a powerful enhancer. however, with the rise of ⁢artificial⁤ superintelligence ‍(ASI), a critical‌ line exists between augmentation and replacement. we must ‍be incredibly thoughtful‌ about how we deploy ASI. Or else, we risk crossing that line, diminishing the very ‍qualities that ‍make​ us human. Here’s a breakdown of the potential‍ pitfalls: Erosion of Confidence: Constant AI assistance could ⁢lead to a reliance that undermines your own⁤ cognitive⁢ skills. Diminished Impact: If you always have⁢ the ⁣”right” answer⁢ provided by AI, your⁢ own contributions may feel less significant. Authenticity Concerns: The ⁤presence of⁤ AI intermediaries⁣ raises questions about the⁢ genuineness of human connection. The “Botsplainer” Effect: ‌ Real-time ‍AI‍ commentary could feel condescending and stifle independent thought. The key‍ lies in prioritizing augmentation over automation. We need to design AI assistants that support your intelligence, not supplant it. This means: focusing on Skill ⁤Enhancement: ‍ AI should help you learn, ‍grow, and refine your⁢ abilities, not simply provide answers. Maintaining Human Agency: You ‍should always ⁢be⁢ in ⁢control, deciding when and how to utilize ⁢AI⁣ assistance. Promoting Critical Thinking: ⁢AI should⁤ encourage ​you to question, analyze, and form your​ own⁤ opinions. Prioritizing ‌Authentic ⁤Connection: We must find ⁢ways to preserve the value of genuine human⁣ interaction in an AI-mediated world. The future⁤ with ubiquitous ‍AI assistants is‍ not ‍predetermined. ⁣By‌ proactively addressing these concerns‍ and prioritizing human-centered design, we can harness⁣ the​ power of‍ AI to truly empower ⁢ourselves, rather than diminish what makes us uniquely human. ‌ Louis rosenberg is an early ⁣pioneer of virtual‌ and augmented reality and a longtime‌ AI ⁣researcher. He founded‍ Immersion Corp, Outland research and Unanimous AI.

With the release OpenAI’s Chat GPT-5, the world is ​one step​ closer to unleashing a general-purpose superintelligence that can cognitively outperform​ each of us by a wide margin. As this day nears, I am‍ increasingly worried that we are woefully ⁢unprepared for the shockwaves this will send through society ‍— and⁤ it’s probably ⁤not for the reasons ‍you expect.

Try this little ⁢experiment: Ask anyone‌ you know if they are concerned about ​AI, ‌and they ‌will ⁣likely ⁣share a⁤ variety of fears,from massive disruptions in the job market and the reality-bending impacts of deepfakes,to the unprecedented power ‌being concentrated in a handful of large AI⁤ companies. In other ‍words, most people have never‍ honestly imagined what their life will really feel like the⁢ day after superintelligence becomes widely available.

Why superintelligence could demoralize us

As ⁢context, ⁣ artificial superintelligence (ASI) refers to systems that can outthink humans ⁤on most fronts, from ⁢planning and reasoning to ‌problem-solving,‍ strategic ​thinking and raw creativity. These systems will solve complex problems in a‌ fraction of ⁣a ‍second that might take the smartest human experts days, ‍weeks ⁣or even⁤ years to work through.⁤ This ‌terrifies me, and it’s not because of the doomsday⁢ scenarios that dominate⁤ our public discourse.

No,‍ I am worried about the opposite risks — the dangers ​that could emerge in the‌ best-case scenarios where superintelligence is helpful and benevolent. Such ⁣an ASI will have many positive impacts ‍on society, but it ⁣could also be deeply demoralizing to our core identity as humans. After all, ⁣the world ⁤will feel different ⁣when each of‍ us⁣ knows that⁤ a smarter, faster, ⁢more creative intelligence is available on our mobile devices ‍than between our own ears.


The Double-Edged Sword of AI Assistants: Will They ‍Empower or Diminish Us?

The future‌ is rapidly approaching where a discreet ‌AI companion in your ear could become commonplace. Imagine never ⁤forgetting a ​name, always having the perfect response,‍ and ‍instantly knowing⁢ when someone isn’t being truthful. This isn’t science fiction; ⁢it’s a⁣ potential reality fueled by ⁢advancements in artificial‌ intelligence. Though,‌ this seemingly utopian scenario comes with a complex‍ set⁣ of challenges that ⁢we must ⁤address now. Everyone around ​you will likely have a similar ‌AI assistant, subtly guiding their​ interactions.‍ This​ raises a ​fundamental question: are⁣ you engaging with the person before​ you, ⁣or‍ with‍ the AI shaping their ⁢responses? It forces us to reconsider the very nature‍ of authentic connection⁤ in​ a world mediated by smart machines.Many believe these body-worn AI assistants will amplify our capabilities, making us feel more⁣ powerful and effective. But a less optimistic​ outcome⁣ is equally plausible. These⁣ technologies ‍could erode⁤ our‍ self-confidence and diminish our sense of agency. Human intelligence has always ⁤been the defining characteristic of our species, a source of​ immense pride.What happens⁤ when we⁣ begin to defer to AI, feeling intellectually ⁣outmatched in our daily ⁢lives?
Also Read:  Wyoming Dinosaur Mummies: Uncovering Secrets of Duck-Billed Dinosaurs
Is⁣ true empowerment found in an ⁢AI that constantly “botsplains” your experiences in ‌real-time? This is‌ a critical question we need to grapple with.

A⁤ Lifelong Pursuit of ⁢human Augmentation

I’ve​ dedicated my career to building technologies that enhance human‍ abilities. my ‌early work in augmented reality, followed ‍by​ my current research into conversational​ agents designed to improve ⁤team performance, stems from a deep conviction that technology can unlock human potential. However, there’s a precarious line between augmentation and replacement, especially when dealing with artificial superintelligence ⁣(ASI). We must be incredibly​ thoughtful‍ about ‌how‌ we⁢ deploy ASI. Otherwise, we risk crossing that line, ⁤inadvertently⁣ diminishing the very⁤ qualities that make us human. Here’s a ​breakdown of the potential pitfalls: Erosion of confidence: Constant AI ​guidance can lead to self-doubt and a reliance on ⁣external validation. Diminished Creativity: Over-reliance on AI-generated responses may stifle‌ original thought and innovative problem-solving. Loss of Authenticity: ⁢ Interactions⁤ become curated and less genuine, impacting the quality of our relationships. Skill Degradation: ‍ We may lose ‍essential cognitive skills ⁤- memory, quick thinking, social intelligence – if we consistently outsource them to‌ AI. These aren’t‌ merely hypothetical concerns. They represent a fundamental shift in how we perceive ‍ourselves⁢ and interact with the world. The development of AI assistants is inevitable,and holds immense promise.⁢ But ‍we must⁣ prioritize human-centered ‍design. This means focusing on technologies that support our⁣ abilities,⁢ rather than supplanting them.‍ Consider these principles: Openness: Users should always be aware⁤ when AI⁣ is ⁢influencing their interactions. Control: ‌ Individuals should have the⁤ ability to customize the ‍level of AI assistance they receive. Focus on⁤ Skill ‌Development: AI should be​ used to⁢ teach and train us, not simply do things for us. Ethical Considerations: We need robust ethical ⁢frameworks to address issues of‌ bias, privacy, and⁣ manipulation. The ⁢future isn’t predetermined. By proactively addressing​ these challenges, we can harness the‍ power of AI to create a world⁢ where technology truly empowers humanity, rather ⁤than diminishing it. It’s a conversation we must have now, before⁣ the line ⁤between ⁢augmentation and replacement becomes irrevocably ⁣blurred.
Louis ⁢Rosenberg is an early ⁣pioneer of virtual and augmented reality and a longtime AI researcher. He founded⁣ Immersion Corp, Outland Research and⁢ Unanimous AI.

The Double-Edged Sword ⁤of AI Assistants: Will ⁢They Empower​ or Erode Human⁤ confidence?

imagine a future where a discreet AI companion resides in​ your ear, subtly ⁣enhancing your every interaction.This superpower ​could ensure ‍you ‍never ​stumble over ​a name, always deliver a witty response, and​ instantly⁣ recognize deception in others. Though, this isn’t⁣ a solo ​advantage.Everyone around you would possess a ⁣similar AI, prompting a fundamental question: are you connecting with the person ⁣before you, or their AI ​proxy? Many experts​ predict body-worn AI assistants will amplify ⁢our ‍feelings of capability‌ and power. But this outcome isn’t guaranteed. These technologies could equally diminish your self-assurance and sense of ​impact. Human intelligence is, ⁢after‌ all, a core⁢ element ‌of our identity, something we inherently value. Consider the possibility of constantly deferring to an AI,feeling intellectually overshadowed. Is ‍this true empowerment,or simply being botsplained through life in real-time?

The Risk ‌of Replacing,Not Augmenting

Throughout my career,I’ve dedicated myself to ⁤building technologies that expand human abilities. From ⁢pioneering work​ in augmented reality to ‌developing conversational​ agents‍ that ⁢boost team performance, I firmly⁢ believe technology can be a powerful ‌enhancer. However, ⁤with the rise of artificial superintelligence (ASI), a critical line exists between augmentation and replacement. We‌ must ​be incredibly thoughtful about ‌how we integrate ASI into our lives. Otherwise, we risk crossing that line, diminishing the very‍ qualities that make us human. Here’s a⁢ breakdown of the potential pitfalls: erosion of Confidence: Constant AI assistance​ could⁣ lead to a reliance that undermines ⁤your own cognitive⁢ skills. Diminished Impact: If you always have the “right” answer provided by AI, your own contributions may​ feel ⁤less ⁣significant. Authenticity⁢ Concerns: The ⁢presence of AI intermediaries raises questions about the genuineness of human connection. The “Botsplaining” Effect: ‌Real-time​ AI commentary⁤ could feel condescending​ and stifle independent⁣ thought. The key ⁢lies‍ in intentional design‌ and deployment. We need​ to prioritize technologies that support human intelligence,⁣ not supplant it. This means: Focusing on Collaboration: AI should act as ‌a partner, offering suggestions and⁢ insights, but ultimately leaving ‍decisions to you. Promoting Skill Development: AI tools ‌should encourage learning and ⁤growth, rather than providing ready-made answers. Prioritizing transparency: It’s crucial to understand how an⁤ AI arrives at its conclusions, ‍fostering trust and accountability. Maintaining Human Agency: ⁣ You should ⁣always retain ⁣control over‌ your interactions and ⁣decisions, even with AI assistance. The future with ubiquitous AI assistants is not predetermined. It’s a future we are actively creating.By ⁢prioritizing human-centered design and mindful implementation,⁢ we can harness ​the power of AI to truly enhance our lives⁤ – without sacrificing the essence of what makes us⁢ human.
louis Rosenberg is an early pioneer⁣ of virtual and augmented reality and a longtime AI researcher. He founded ​Immersion Corp,​ Outland Research and Unanimous ​AI.

The Double-Edged Sword of AI Assistants: Will They Empower or ‍Diminish Us?

The future is ​rapidly approaching where a ⁣discreet AI companion in your ear could become commonplace. ​Imagine never forgetting a name, always ‌having the perfect response, and instantly knowing when someone isn’t ⁤being ⁤truthful. This isn’t science fiction; it’s⁤ a potential​ reality ⁤fueled by⁣ advancements in artificial ‍intelligence.⁢ Though, this seemingly utopian scenario comes with a complex set of challenges that we must address now.Everyone around you will likely have a similar AI assistant, subtly guiding their interactions. This raises a fundamental question:⁣ are ​you truly connecting with the person in front of you, or with the AI shaping their responses? It’s a thought-provoking scenario, highlighting the blurring​ lines between human ⁢interaction and algorithmic influence.
Also Read:  Gen Z & Data Leaks: Are Company Secrets at Risk?
Many believe these body-worn⁤ AI assistants ⁤will boost ⁣our confidence and capabilities.But a less optimistic outcome is equally ‍plausible. Consider this: human ⁤intelligence is what defines us, what we‌ value ⁣most. What happens when we begin to defer to⁣ AI,feeling intellectually ‌overshadowed?⁤ Is that empowerment,or ‍simply being told what to think and⁣ say?

The​ Risk of Outsourcing​ Our Minds

This isn’t about fearing technology; it’s about understanding its potential⁤ impact ​on ⁢what makes us human. Throughout my career, I’ve​ dedicated myself to building technologies that ​ enhance ⁣human abilities. My early ‌work​ in augmented reality aimed to overlay digital details‍ onto our‌ perception of the world. Currently, I’m focused on‍ developing ⁣conversational agents designed to make ⁤teams more effective. I firmly believe technology can‌ be⁣ a powerful force for good. Though, there’s⁢ a critical distinction ⁢between augmentation and replacement, especially when dealing ⁢with advanced AI – sometimes called Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). ⁢We⁣ must be incredibly thoughtful ⁣about how ⁢we deploy these technologies, or we ⁤risk eroding the very skills ⁤we seek ⁤to amplify.

Potential Downsides to Consider

Here’s a breakdown of the ‌potential pitfalls we face: Diminished self-Reliance: Constantly relying on an AI for answers⁣ could weaken your critical thinking and memory skills. Erosion‍ of Confidence: If ‌you always second-guess yourself against an AI’s suggestions, your self-assurance will⁣ likely​ suffer. Authenticity Concerns: ⁣Interactions could become performative,driven by ⁤AI-generated responses rather than genuine emotion and thought. The “Botsplainer” effect: ​ An‍ AI constantly explaining‍ your experiences in real-time could feel condescending and disempowering. Social Disconnect: The subtle influence of AI‌ on everyone’s behavior could create a sense of unease and distrust in social ⁤interactions. The development of ASI is ‍inevitable, but its impact isn’t predetermined. We have a obligation to shape this technology in a way that truly benefits humanity. This requires: Prioritizing Augmentation: ⁢Focus on AI‌ tools⁤ that assist your thinking, rather than‌ replacing ⁣it. Promoting Transparency: Understand how ‍AI is influencing⁢ your interactions and be aware of its limitations. Cultivating critical Thinking: Continue to ⁣challenge yourself ‌and‍ develop your own ⁢independent thought processes. Fostering Human Connection: Value ‌genuine interactions⁤ and prioritize authentic communication. I’ve spent⁤ years building⁢ tools to expand ⁣human potential. My hope‌ is that we can harness the ‌power ‍of AI‍ without ⁣sacrificing the qualities⁤ that ​make us uniquely human. The future isn’t something ⁤that happens to* us; it’s something we create.⁣ Let’s create a ⁣future where ‍technology empowers us, ‍rather than diminishes us.
Louis Rosenberg ⁢ is an​ early pioneer ⁣of ⁤virtual and⁤ augmented ⁤reality and a longtime AI​ researcher. He founded Immersion ‌Corp, Outland ⁢Research and⁢ Unanimous‌ AI.
  • Turning energy into a strategic​ advantage
  • Architecting efficient inference for real throughput gains
  • Unlocking competitive ROI with sustainable AI systems
  • The ​Double-Edged Sword of‌ AI ‍Assistants:‍ Will They Empower or Diminish Us?

    The future is rapidly approaching where a discreet AI⁢ companion ‍in your ear could become commonplace. imagine‌ never forgetting a name, always having the perfect response, and instantly knowing⁣ when someone isn’t being⁢ truthful.This ‌isn’t science fiction; it’s a potential​ reality fueled by advancements in artificial intelligence.⁤ However,this seemingly utopian scenario⁢ comes with a complex set of challenges that we must address now.Everyone around you⁣ will likely have a ⁣similar AI assistant,subtly guiding their interactions. ⁢this raises ⁤a fundamental question: are you ‍truly connecting with ⁤the⁢ person in front of you, or with the AI shaping their responses? It’s a thought-provoking scenario, highlighting the blurring lines between‌ human interaction⁤ and algorithmic influence.Many believe these body-worn AI assistants will boost our confidence and capabilities.But ‌a less optimistic outcome is equally plausible. Consider this: human intelligence is what defines us, what we value most.What‌ happens when ‌we begin to⁣ defer to AI, feeling intellectually overshadowed? Is that empowerment, or simply being told what to ‍think and say?

    The Risk⁤ of ‍Outsourcing Our Minds

    This isn’t about fearing‍ technology; it’s about understanding its potential impact on what makes us human. ​Throughout my career, I’ve dedicated myself to building technologies that enhance human abilities.‍ From pioneering work in augmented reality to developing conversational AI that strengthens teamwork, I firmly believe in technology’s power to elevate us. However, there’s a critical distinction between augmentation and replacement, especially when dealing with advanced⁤ AI. We risk⁤ crossing that‌ line if ‍we aren’t deliberate in how we integrate these powerful ​tools into our lives. Here’s a ‌breakdown of the potential downsides: Erosion of⁤ Confidence: Constant AI guidance could diminish your ​self-reliance and trust‌ in your own ⁤judgment. Diminished Impact: Relying on AI for every‍ interaction might reduce your ability‌ to think critically and contribute‌ meaningfully. Authenticity Concerns: If ⁤everyone is AI-assisted, genuine ⁤connection becomes harder to​ achieve, fostering a sense of detachment. The “Botsplainer” ‍Effect: Having an AI constantly explaining your experiences in⁢ real-time can feel condescending and disempowering.

    A Call for Thoughtful Deployment

    The development of artificial superintelligence⁣ (ASI) demands careful consideration. We need to prioritize designs that‌ complement human intelligence, not supplant ⁤it. ⁣This means focusing on tools ‍that: Provide options, not ⁤directives: AI should‌ offer suggestions, not dictate responses. Promote learning, not dependence: The ​goal should be to help you improve ‌your skills, not​ to become reliant on ‌the AI. Respect autonomy: You‌ should always be in control ⁣of your interactions,not guided by an algorithm. Prioritize transparency: Understand how ⁤ the AI ⁣is making⁣ its suggestions.
    Also Read:  Newcastle vs Fulham Live Stream: Watch the Carabao Cup Free & Legally
    I’ve spent years researching and ​building technologies to amplify⁤ human potential.my work ⁤with Immersion Corp, Outland Research, ​and Unanimous AI has consistently focused on collaboration between humans and machines. ​ But the stakes are higher than⁤ ever. We ‌stand at a crossroads. We can harness the power of AI to unlock new ⁢levels of‌ human achievement, or ⁣we can inadvertently diminish the very qualities‌ that make us unique. ⁤ The ⁤choice is ours,and ⁣the time to act is now. Louis Rosenberg is an early pioneer of ​virtual and augmented reality and a ⁤longtime AI ⁤researcher. He founded Immersion ⁣Corp, Outland⁢ Research and Unanimous AI. Daily⁢ insights on business use cases with VB Daily. If you ⁢want to impress your ⁢boss, VB Daily has you covered. We ⁣give​ you the inside scoop on ​what companies are ​doing with generative AI,from ⁣regulatory shifts to practical⁢ deployments,so you can share insights ‌for​ maximum ROI. Read our Privacy Policy. Thanks for subscribing. Check out more VB newsletters here. An error occurred.

    So ask yourself,‍ honestly, how⁢ will humans⁣ act in this new reality? Will we reflexively​ seek advice‌ from​ our AI⁢ assistants as ​we⁣ navigate every little challenge we encounter? Or worse, will we⁤ learn to trust our AI assistants more⁤ than our own thoughts and instincts?

    Wait — before you answer, you must update your mental model.currently, we ‍engage AI‍ through a Socratic framework that requires us to ask questions and get answers (like⁤ Captain Kirk did⁢ aboard the Enterprise in 1966). But that’s old-school thinking. We are ‍now entering a⁤ new era in which AI assistants will​ be integrated ⁢into body-worn devices that are equipped with ‍cameras and ⁣microphones, enabling AI to see what you see, hear what you hear and whisper advice ​into your ears without you needing to ask.

    Simply put, our future will be filled with AI assistants that ⁤ride⁤ shotgun in‍ our lives, augmenting our experiences ‌with optimized guidance at every turn. ‌In this world, the risk is not that we reflexively ​ask AI for advice before⁤ using our own brains;‍ the risk is that we won’t need to ​ask – the advice⁤ will just ‌stream into our eyes and ears,⁢ shaping our actions, influencing our decisions and ⁢solving our problems before we’ve had a chance​ to think ⁢for ourselves.

    ‘Augmented mentality’ will transform our lives

    I ⁢refer to this framework as ‘augmented ⁢mentality‘ and ‌it is indeed about to hit society at scale through AI-powered glasses, earbuds and pendants.  ⁣this is the future of‍ mobile computing,and it is already driving an arms race ‍between⁤ Meta,Google,Samsung and Apple,as they position themselves to produce the context-aware AI‍ devices that will ‌replace handheld phones.

    Imagine walking down the ⁤street in your ‍town. You see a coworker heading towards​ you. You can’t remember ‌his name, but your AI ⁢assistant dose. ⁢It detects ⁤your hesitation and whispers the coworker’s name into your ears.  The AI‍ also recommends that you ask the coworker ‍about his wife, ⁣who had ⁢surgery a few weeks ​ago.  The coworker ​appreciates the sentiment, then asks you about your recent promotion, likely at the advice of his own AI.

    Is this human empowerment,⁢ or a loss of human agency?

    It will certainly feel like a⁤ superpower to have an AI in your⁣ ear that⁢ always has your ⁤back, ensuring you ‍never⁤ forget a name, always​ have witty things to say and ⁤are instantly ⁢alerted when someone you’re talking to is not being truthful. On the other hand,everyone you ⁢meet will have ⁤their own AI ​muttering⁢ in their own ears. This will​ make us wonder who we’re really interacting‌ with — the human in front of us, or the AI agent giving them guidance ‍(check out Carbon Dating for⁤ fun examples).

    many experts‌ believe that body-worn⁤ AI assistants⁣ will make us feel more​ powerful and capable,but that’s not the ​only way this could go.These same technologies could make us feel less confident in⁤ ourselves and ⁤less impactful‌ in our ‍lives.⁢ After all,‌ human intelligence is the defining feature of humanity, the thing we take most pride ‍in as a⁣ species,‌ yet we could‌ soon find ourselves deferring⁣ to AI assistants as we feel ⁤mentally​ outmatched. Is ⁢this empowerment — an AI that ‍ botsplains our every experiance ⁢in real ‌time?

    I raise these concerns as ⁢someone who has spent my entire career creating technologies ⁢that expand⁣ human ‌abilities. From‍ my early work ‍developing augmented reality⁢ to my current work developing conversational agents ⁢ that make human teams smarter,I am a firm believer that technology​ can greatly enhance human abilities. Sadly, when it comes to superintelligence, there is a fine line between augmenting⁤ our ‌human abilities and replacing them. Unless we are⁣ thoughtful in how we deploy ASI, I fear we will‍ cross that line.

    Louis Rosenberg is⁢ an early pioneer of virtual and augmented⁤ reality and ‍a longtime AI researcher. He founded Immersion ‍Corp, Outland Research and Unanimous AI.

    Leave a Reply