Teh Illusion of Safety: Why Apps Like Tea can’t Solve Misogyny
The rise of apps like Tea, designed to warn women about potentially harmful men, sparked a flurry of attention. However, a closer look reveals a troubling paradox: these tools, intended to empower, may inadvertently reinforce a system that places the burden of safety squarely on women’s shoulders. This article delves into the limitations of “safety through information,” the inherent flaws of relying on whisper networks, and why a truly effective solution requires a essential shift in societal attitudes towards violence against women.
the Neoliberal Approach to Women’s Safety
According to researcher Emily Mulvihill, apps like Tea frame women’s safety as an “individual issue of risk management.” this contrasts sharply with the understanding that addressing violence requires broad social and public policy changes. Essentially, it suggests you can protect yourself through vigilance and information gathering, rather than demanding accountability from perpetrators and systemic change.
this approach, while seemingly empowering, can be deeply problematic. Mulvihill explains that it can lead to “responsibilizing individual women for managing men’s violence.” if harm occurs, the focus shifts to what you should have done differently, rather than the perpetrator’s actions.
The Limits of “Knowing” and Red Flags
The idea that knowledge equates to safety is a pervasive one, notably online. You’ve likely encountered “red flag” lists detailing behaviors to avoid in potential partners. however, as Mulvihill’s 2025 study, “The New Experts of Online Dating: feminism, Advice, and Harm,” co-authored with Joanna large, demonstrates, “knowing” is simply not enough.
Consider these key points:
Information is incomplete: No amount of research can guarantee your safety. Knowledge doesn’t prevent harm: Even with perfect information, abusive individuals can still inflict damage. The onus shouldn’t be on you: The obligation for preventing violence lies with the perpetrator, not the potential victim.
whisper networks and the Problem with Corporate Mediation
Whisper networks – informal sharing of information about problematic individuals – have long been a survival tactic for women. Though,when a company like Tea facilitates these networks,the dynamic changes.
Here’s why:
Loss of control: You relinquish control over the information and its dissemination.
Commodification of sisterhood: The app attempts to “sell” safety, turning a vital support system into a product.
Increased vulnerability: Centralizing information creates a target for retaliation.
Backlash and Legal Repercussions
Predictably,the Tea app has faced significant backlash. Disgruntled men have proposed counter-apps designed to harass and humiliate women. Moreover, law firms are now advising men on how to legally challenge information posted about them.
This highlights a crucial point: you are often the one who faces repercussions for attempting to protect yourself.The system is frequently stacked against those who speak out.
A Systemic Problem Requires systemic Solutions
The Tea app’s brief moment in the spotlight ultimately revealed a harsh truth. Women’s experiences with misogyny cannot be solved with a consumer product. sisterhood cannot be scaled and sold.
Rather, we need to focus on:
Addressing the root causes of violence: This includes challenging patriarchal norms and promoting gender equality.
Holding perpetrators accountable: strengthening legal protections and ensuring justice for survivors.
Investing in prevention programs: Educating individuals about healthy relationships and bystander intervention.
Supporting survivor-led organizations: Empowering those with lived experience to lead the change.If simply scrolling through your phone could solve the problem of misogyny,wouldn’t we have found a solution by now? True safety requires more than an app; it demands a fundamental shift in how we understand and address gender-based violence.
