The Unraveling in Venezuela: A US Policy Defined by Incoherence and Escalation
The recent developments in Venezuela, culminating in the ambiguous fate of its former president, are not a triumph of strategic foresight, but a stark illustration of a US foreign policy adrift.From the outset, the Trump management’s approach has been characterized by a troubling incoherence, escalating tensions without a clear objective, and ultimately, a deepening of the very instability it purported to resolve. The situation demands a sober assessment, moving beyond rhetoric to understand the complex realities on the ground and the potential consequences of continued missteps.
The Flawed Premise: A Misunderstanding of Venezuela’s Role in the Drug Trade
The initial justification for the increased US naval presence in Venezuelan waters – stemming the flow of drugs to the United States – quickly unraveled under scrutiny. While Venezuela undeniably serves as a transshipment point for narcotics, it is indeed not a primary source of cocaine, and crucially, produces no fentanyl. This fundamental mischaracterization, repeatedly asserted by the Trump administration, served as a pretext for escalating pressure on the Maduro government, falsely framing it as a “narco-terrorist regime.” The subsequent indictment, notably, focused solely on cocaine, revealing the fragility of the initial claims. This reliance on demonstrably false narratives immediately eroded the credibility of the US position.
From Regime change Fantasies to Escalating Risks
The early strategy hinged on a naive belief that a significant naval buildup and bellicose rhetoric would incite a military coup against Maduro. this “regime change on the cheap” failed to materialize. However, rather than recalibrating, the administration appeared to contemplate more drastic measures, including direct military intervention – bombing campaigns and even the potential seizure of Maduro himself. This escalation, driven by a desire to demonstrate strength, ignored the inherent risks and potential for unintended consequences.
The current outcome – a power vacuum following Maduro’s disappearance and a scramble for control among elements within the former government, including figures like Delcy Rodríguez – is a direct result of this escalation. The effort has not liberated the Venezuelan people; it has rather instilled fear and uncertainty,creating fertile ground for further instability.
The Illusion of Control: Machado, Interim Governments, and Transactional Diplomacy
The recent dismissal of Maria Corina Machado’s democratic legitimacy and the apparent consideration of a Madurista interim government further complicate the situation. Can a compromise forged through such questionable means truly deliver democracy to Venezuela? It is highly improbable. Even if reported backchannel conversations between Rodríguez and figures like Senator Rubio suggest a shift in stance, these private assurances ring hollow against a backdrop of defiant public pronouncements.
This approach underscores a troubling pattern: a prioritization of short-term political gains over genuine democratic principles. The administration’s focus appears to be on securing a government amenable to its “transactional demands” – access to oil resources, for example – rather than fostering a sustainable, internally-driven democratic transition.
A Broken Promise: Abandoning the Principles of Limited Intervention
The current situation stands in stark contrast to President Trump’s 2016 pledge to end “forever wars” and avoid costly regime change interventions. There is little appetite in Washington for the prolonged commitment – both in terms of troops and resources – required to rebuild Venezuela and establish a stable, democratic foundation.
moreover, the administration’s claims regarding stolen US oil investments are historically inaccurate and serve only to muddy the waters. The nationalization of these assets occured decades ago, long before the current political landscape.This demonstrates a lack of historical understanding and a willingness to distort facts to fit a pre-determined narrative.
The Venezuelan People: The Key to a Sustainable Future
While the US military could perhaps engineer a compromise, such an outcome would not be rooted in a genuine commitment to human rights or democracy. The true path forward lies with the Venezuelan people, who demonstrated their courage and resolve in 2024 by delivering a unified opposition an internationally recognized victory.
Despite rhetoric suggesting a potential US protectorate, the administration lacks the levers to impose such a reality without resorting to a full-scale invasion or relying on a precarious internal coup. venezuela’s future hinges on the commitment of its citizens to democracy and human rights, and crucially, on whether the US is willing to genuinely support those efforts, rather than dictate the outcome.
A Dangerous Crossroads: Chaos and Inconsistency
For now, the administration appears fixated on achieving “swift wins” and projecting an image of strength, prioritizing transactional deals over genuine democratic progress. Consequently, Venezuelan citizens find themselves trapped between the oppressive realities of a socialist
![South Korea-China Summit: Navigating Taiwan Concerns | [Year] Update](https://i0.wp.com/hongkongfp.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/RENAME-before-upload-Article-Basic-Full-logo-60.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1 "South Korea-China Summit: Navigating Taiwan Concerns | [Year] Update"){kind=logo}
