Here’s a breakdown of the key facts from the provided text:
The Situation:
* The US government, under a previous administration (implied to be Trump’s), expressed interest in acquiring Greenland. This started with a social media post and escalated to a senior official stating it was the “formal position” of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US.
* The US even suggested they wouldn’t face resistance in taking greenland, implying potential use of force.
Greenland’s Response:
* Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has called for ”respectful dialogue” but emphasized Greenland’s right to self-determination and territorial integrity under international law.
* There is strong opposition among Greenlanders to becoming part of the US. Polls show overwhelming preference for eventual independence from Denmark, not annexation by the US.
* Protests have already occurred in Greenland against previous US overtures.
* Greenlanders feel their land is already claimed by its people (the Inuit).
US Justification/Current Stance:
* The US claims its interest is driven by concerns about increasing activity from “common adversaries” in the Arctic.
* The US is now focusing on building “lasting commercial relationships” with Greenland.
* Reports suggest the US considered both purchasing Greenland outright or establishing a “Compact of Free Association” (a relationship similar to those with some Pacific Island nations).
* US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has clarified that an invasion is not planned, but purchasing Greenland is still on the table.
Background:
* Greenland has extensive self-government but Denmark retains control over defense and foreign policy.
* The issue resurfaced after a US military intervention in Venezuela.
* The US already has a military base in Greenland.
In essence, the US has made overtures to acquire Greenland, which have been met with resistance from greenland and denmark, and have raised concerns among Greenlanders about potential loss of sovereignty and even invasion.
