Beneath the Surface: Why Robert Zemeckis’ “What Lies Beneath” Still Haunts Us
Robert zemeckis’ 2000 thriller, “What Lies beneath,” starring Harrison Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer, often gets lost in the shuffle of early 21st-century blockbusters. However, revisiting this film reveals a meticulously crafted homage to Alfred Hitchcock, brimming with suspense and anchored by compelling performances. It’s a film that deserves renewed attention,especially considering the current landscape of horror and psychological thrillers.
But first, a quick observation about the film’s initial reception. The marketing push for “What Lies Beneath” felt premature, a common pitfall that unfortunately hampered the success of many films around that time. A slower, more intentional build-up could have amplified its impact.
A Masterclass in Performance and Suspense
“What Lies beneath” stands out as a rare star vehicle that genuinely demands acting from its leads. Michelle Pfeiffer delivers a nuanced performance, transforming a perhaps stereotypical “hysterical woman” into a sympathetic and layered character. Yet, the film truly belongs to Harrison Ford.
This is a side of Ford rarely seen, a deeply internalized portrayal of a man grappling with secrets and suspicion. it’s an underrated performance, arguably among his best. Each viewing reveals a consistent darkness and depth to his character’s torment.
The film’s screenplay,penned by Clark Gregg,is a love letter to Hitchcock. You’ll find visual and thematic echoes of classics like “Psycho” (1960) and “Rear Window” (1954), alongside nods to “Ghost Story” (1981), “The Shining” (1980), and even ”Diabolique.” Zemeckis doesn’t simply imitate; he creates a meticulously designed tribute that rivals the work of Brian de Palma in its homage.
Flaws and Finishes: A Hitchcockian Imperfection
Despite its strengths, “What lies Beneath” isn’t flawless. At 130 minutes,the film feels slightly overlong. The extended finale, while suspenseful, could benefit from trimming.
The climactic scenes, while avoiding the CGI pitfalls of films like the 1999 remake of “The Haunting,” occasionally come close to excess. Alan Silvestri’s score, though generally excellent, leans a little too heavily on Bernard Herrmann‘s iconic style. It feels somewhat needless, as the Hitchcockian influence is already abundantly clear.
However,the film redeems itself with moments of genuine brilliance. The bathtub sequence near the end is a masterclass in suspense. Through expert editing, sound design, and camera angles, zemeckis places you directly into the protagonist’s terrifying experience.
Zemeckis: A Director at a Crossroads
“What Lies beneath” represents a high point in Zemeckis’ filmography. It’s a lavish blockbuster that Hitchcock himself likely would have enjoyed. It’s a far cry from his more recent work.
While Zemeckis’ earlier films like “Flight” (2012), “The Polar Express” (2004), and even the visually stunning “Beowulf” (2007) showcased his innovative use of special effects as a storytelling tool, his recent output has been…disappointing. “The witches” (2020), “Pinocchio” (2022), and “Here” (2024) feel bogged down by excessive effects and weak scripts, bordering on self-parody.
It’s a frustrating trajectory. The zemeckis of today seems constrained by the very technology he helped pioneer.One can’t help but hope for a return to form, a resurgence of the director who understood how to blend spectacle with substance.
Why You Should Watch (or Re-Watch) “What Lies Beneath”
“What Lies Beneath” offers big scares and a deeply unsettling theme: questioning everything you think you know about the person you love. It’s a perfect double feature pairing with Gillian Flynn‘s “Gone girl” (2014), exploring similar themes of marital deception and psychological manipulation.
If you appreciate Hitchcockian suspense, strong performances, and a
Related reading