The Looming shutdown: A Dangerous Precedent and the erosion of Federal Function
The specter of a government shutdown looms large as Congress races against the clock to finalize federal spending bills before the end of the year. While lawmakers on both sides of the aisle claim there’s still time to avert a crisis, the current standoff feels different – and possibly more damaging – than previous budgetary impasses. This isn’t simply a matter of political maneuvering; it’s a exhibition of a shifting approach to governance, one where the very function of the federal government is being questioned and, in some cases, deliberately dismantled.
For decades, government shutdowns were viewed as disruptive, but ultimately temporary inconveniences. A frustrating pause, perhaps, but one that eventually resolved itself with minimal long-term consequences. However, the Trump governance’s handling of the 2018-2019 shutdown, and the subsequent actions taken, have fundamentally altered that perception. It’s a shift that demands serious attention, not just from Washington insiders, but from every American who relies on the services provided by a functioning federal government.
A Changed Dynamic: From Blame Game to Strategic Disruption
The contrast between Trump’s approach to the current potential shutdown and his handling of the last one is striking. in 2018-2019, he publicly owned the shutdown, famously declaring, “I’ll be the one to shut it down,” in a televised exchange with Senator Chuck Schumer. That shutdown ultimately lasted 35 days, the longest in US history, and ended with the President caving to Democratic demands. Furloughed workers received back pay,a temporary balm for a significant disruption.
This time, the narrative is different. Trump is actively shifting blame, pointing fingers at “crazy Democrats” and framing the potential shutdown as their fault. This isn’t simply a matter of political posturing.It’s a purposeful strategy to distance himself from the consequences and to leverage the shutdown as a tool to achieve broader political goals.
And those goals extend beyond conventional budgetary concerns. Trump is actively attempting to reframe the debate, pivoting to issues that resonated with his base in the 2023 election: immigration and transgender rights. By falsely linking Democratic demands for healthcare spending to benefits for undocumented immigrants and launching attacks on transgender inclusion, he’s attempting to exploit existing cultural divides and rally support for a hardline stance.
The Human Cost: Federal Workers as Collateral Damage
While the political theater plays out, the real victims are often overlooked: the hundreds of thousands of federal employees who face uncertainty and potential hardship.Abby André, Executive Director of the Impact Project, a non-profit dedicated to tracking the impact of political events on federal workers, notes a disturbing trend.
“Games of chicken are common before shutdowns,” André explains, “but this administration has demonstrated a willingness to follow through on threats that previous administrations woudl have considered reckless. The willingness to risk a non-functioning federal government is a significant departure from the norm.”
This isn’t just about temporary inconvenience. The eight months of paying federal workers to remain at home during previous disruptions have seemingly led to a dangerous conclusion within the administration: that many government functions are expendable. This is a profoundly unsettling realization.
Dismantling from Within: the Case of Voice of America
The fate of Voice of America (VOA) serves as a chilling example of this mindset. Following an executive order signed by Trump in March, aimed at eliminating the U.S.Agency for Global Media, much of VOA’s programming was abruptly halted. Hundreds of journalists,including White House Bureau Chief Patsy Widakuswara,were placed on paid administrative leave.
widakuswara is now leading a lawsuit to restore VOA’s operations, but the situation is dire. Many of her colleagues face imminent termination, paralyzed by fear that the agency, a cornerstone of international broadcasting sence World War II, could be permanently dismantled.
“I feel terrible as a VOA journalist, and I also feel horrified as an American taxpayer, as this is all waste,” Widakuswara told us. ”The intention is not to improve anything. The intention is to just dismantle.” Her experience highlights the demoralizing reality of being paid to not perform essential journalistic functions, and the broader implications of a government actively undermining its own institutions.
A Dangerous Precedent
The potential for a shutdown, coupled with the administration’s willingness to disrupt and dismantle government functions, represents a dangerous precedent. It signals a
