Uganda’s upcoming elections are unfolding amidst growing concerns over political repression and restrictions on fundamental freedoms. As the nation prepares to head to the polls,the surroundings is increasingly characterized by limitations on opposition activities and constraints on access to facts. This situation raises serious questions about the fairness and credibility of the electoral process.
A Tightening Grip on Political Opposition
Key opposition figure Kizza Besigye remains detained on treason charges, a move widely seen as an attempt to stifle dissent. This action, coupled with other restrictions, is creating a climate of fear and intimidation. Robert Kyagulanyi, known as Bobi Wine, is challenging the long-time President Yoweri Museveni, but faces meaningful hurdles. Wine acknowledges the challenges, stating his campaign is against impunity
, yet he doesn’t anticipate a truly equitable contest.
The United Nations Human Rights Office has voiced criticism, highlighting what it describes as widespread repression and intimidation
preceding the vote. This assessment underscores the deteriorating human rights situation and the potential for further erosion of democratic principles. According to a recent report by Freedom House (December 2025), Uganda’s freedom score has declined steadily over the past decade, indicating a concerning trend towards authoritarianism.
Government Actions and Restrictions
The government maintains that security measures are necessary to address what it terms lawless conduct
by opposition supporters. Though, critics argue these actions are disproportionate and designed to suppress legitimate political activity. In a move that has drawn international condemnation, authorities have shut down the internet, citing the need to prevent the spread of misinformation, disinformation, electoral fraud and related risks
. This disruption severely limits citizens’ access to information and hinders independent election monitoring.
Beyond the internet shutdown, the government has also ordered the suspension of operations for two prominent rights organizations: Chapter Four Uganda and the Human Rights Network for Journalists-Uganda. The National Bureau for NGOs accused Chapter Four Uganda of activities prejudicial
to Uganda’s security, effectively silencing a critical voice.Experts, like Kristof Titeca from Antwerp University, believe this clampdown has created an environment where it’s too dangerous
for the opposition to organize effectively. I’ve found that such restrictions often
Keep reading