Val Kilmer has returned to the screen through artificial intelligence in a new project featured on TG5, sparking renewed debate about the use of AI in film and the ethical boundaries of digitally resurrecting performers. The segment, aired on Mediaset Infinity, showcased a short film in which Kilmer’s likeness and voice were recreated using AI technology, prompting immediate reactions from fans, industry professionals, and advocacy groups concerned about consent and legacy rights.
The use of AI to recreate deceased or incapacitated actors has turn into a growing point of contention in global entertainment, particularly following recent strikes in Hollywood that led to new contractual protections around digital likenesses. Although Val Kilmer is alive and has publicly discussed his health challenges after a throat cancer diagnosis in 2015, the TG5 feature raised questions about whether AI-generated performances require explicit, ongoing consent — especially when used in contexts the actor may not have directly approved.
According to verified reports, Kilmer has collaborated with AI developers in the past to restore his voice using archival recordings, a process he described as meaningful for personal communication. However, the TG5 presentation appeared to travel beyond assistive technology, presenting a fully AI-driven performance that some viewers interpreted as a posthumous tribute, despite Kilmer being alive. This distinction has fueled confusion online, with some social media users mistakenly believing he had passed away.
To clarify, fact-checking confirms Val Kilmer is alive as of April 2026. His representatives have not issued a public statement specifically addressing the TG5 AI feature, but prior interviews indicate he supports technological aids that help him communicate after losing much of his natural voice to cancer treatment. In a 2021 interview with The New York Times, Kilmer discussed working with AI company Sonantic to recreate his voice using machine learning trained on traditional audio files, calling it a “gift” that allowed him to speak again.
The broader controversy reflects ongoing tensions in the entertainment industry over AI’s role in creative work. During the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, union members successfully negotiated terms requiring informed consent and compensation for the use of an actor’s digital replica in future projects. These protections, now part of the union’s basic agreement, apply to living performers and establish that studios cannot use AI-generated likenesses without permission — a framework designed to prevent unauthorized digital recreations.
Ethicists and legal experts note that while Kilmer’s case may involve consensual technology use for personal expression, the public presentation of AI-generated performances blurs lines between assistance and replacement. As BBC News reported in late 2025, even consensual AI use in film raises concerns about setting precedents that could eventually undermine actor autonomy, particularly if studios begin favoring digital doubles over hiring living talent for cost or convenience reasons.
The TG5 segment has not been widely distributed outside Italy, but clips circulated on European social media platforms, prompting discussions about media literacy and the necessitate for clear labeling when AI is used in audiovisual content. Unlike deepfakes created without consent, Kilmer’s AI appearance appears to stem from authorized collaboration — yet the lack of contextual disclosure in the broadcast led some audiences to misinterpret the nature of the technology’s use.
Industry watchdogs such as the Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Institute have called for standardized disclosure practices, urging broadcasters and streaming platforms to include on-screen notices when AI significantly alters or generates a performer’s image or voice. Such measures, they argue, help maintain trust and ensure viewers are not misled about what they are seeing.
As of now, there are no announced plans for a full-length film featuring an AI-generated Val Kilmer performance, nor has any studio confirmed plans to use his digital likeness in upcoming projects. The TG5 appearance remains an isolated example, possibly intended as a demonstration of technology rather than a commercial production.
Moving forward, the conversation around AI in entertainment is expected to evolve alongside regulatory developments. In the United States, the NO FAKES Act — introduced in Congress in 2024 and reintroduced in 2025 — seeks to establish federal rights over personal likeness and voice, making it illegal to produce or distribute unauthorized digital replicas. While still under review, the bill has gained bipartisan support and backing from major entertainment unions.
For audiences seeking clarity on AI use in media, experts recommend looking for official disclosures, checking studio statements, and consulting fact-checking organizations that track synthetic media trends. As entertainment continues to integrate advanced technologies, transparency and consent will remain central to ethical innovation.
Stay informed about developments in AI and entertainment by following updates from trusted industry sources and union announcements. Share your thoughts on the use of AI in film — where should the line be drawn between tribute and exploitation?
Related reading