Home / Health / Chicago Rat Hole: Mystery Solved – Not Made by Rats?

Chicago Rat Hole: Mystery Solved – Not Made by Rats?

Chicago Rat Hole: Mystery Solved – Not Made by Rats?
Amanda Heidt 2025-10-14 23:01:00

Chicago’s viral ‘Rat Hole’ is less rat splat, more‌ squirrel squish.

Researchers determined it was probably‍ a squirrel that left a rodent-shaped impression in the concrete of the Windy City. Thier new study,⁢ published October 15 in Biology Letters, borrowed paleontological tools to⁤ analyze the bizarre and beloved local landmark.

Michael Granatosky, an evolutionary biomechanics researcher at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, ⁣was motivated to study the decades-old imprint ​shortly after artist Winslow Dumaine posted about the site in 2024.⁤ Dubbed Splatatouille, the Chicago Rat​ Hole quickly became a viral sensation, with visitors to the ⁣city’s Roscoe Village neighborhood leaving coins, flowers and other paraphernalia⁢ before the slab was moved to City Hall. Despite Chicago’s status as the “rattiest city in America,” the culprit⁣ has ⁤ long ‍been questioned.

“Even if people weren’t thinking of it as science, ‌it‌ was clear they were applying deductive reasoning,” Granatosky ⁣says. ⁤“It seemed ⁢like‌ a fun ⁢project to apply the scientific method to somthing that’s lighthearted.”

Granatosky and his colleagues leveraged the ​viral nature of the site to amass dozens of images.From those photos, they collected measurements of anatomical features, including the snout-to-tail length and head width. Using the app iNaturalist, the team identified‌ eight small mammal species found in‌ Chicago. The group then compared the same​ measurements from museum specimens of the candidates to the imprint.

The ‌measurements most closely match those of⁤ an eastern ​gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) or a fox squirrel ​(S.niger). Granatosky says⁣ the working hypothesis is that the animal probably created⁣ the hole after it fell⁢ out of a tree that ⁣residents say‌ was once⁤ in the vicinity. For a rat to achieve the same effect, it would have needed to be⁢ dropped by a bird, as there don’t appear to be any footprints. Rat purists note that there’s no bushy tail in the impression, but Granatosky says it’s unlikely concrete would capture such fine detail.

Even⁤ with all the details the⁤ team had,it still wasn’t able to make a ​definitive identification from this relatively⁤ recent critter crater,highlighting just⁤ how challenging this work can be when analyzing ancient paleontological specimens. Granatosky hopes this case study​ will spark debate among colleagues and public curiosity, and is currently developing⁢ a lesson plan for children.

“It’s so rare⁤ to get such a fun story,” he says. “It really ⁢speaks to what we do in my lab, ‌which is take⁢ data and package it ⁤in a way‌ that is accessible.”

Also Read:  CDC Error 404: Broken Link & Resource Guide

Leave a Reply