Dua Lipa Files $15 Million Lawsuit Against Samsung Over Unauthorized Use of Image on TV Packaging
Pop superstar Dua Lipa has launched a significant legal battle against technology giant Samsung, seeking $15 million in damages. The lawsuit alleges that the company used the singer’s likeness on packaging for its television models in the United States without obtaining the necessary permissions or consent.
The complaint, which was filed on Friday in the US District Court for the Central District of California, marks a high-stakes confrontation between one of the world’s most recognizable musical icons and a global electronics leader. At the heart of the dispute is the alleged unauthorized exploitation of Lipa’s image to drive product sales.
The Allegation: Unauthorized Use of Festival Imagery
According to the legal filing, the image in question is a photograph of Dua Lipa taken during her performance at the 2024 Austin City Limits Festival. The lawsuit asserts that Lipa holds the copyright to this specific photograph. The singer’s legal team contends that Samsung prominently featured a photograph of her face on television packaging sold across the U.S. Market.

The filing argues that Samsung’s decision to use the image was a calculated move “designed to improperly capitalize on Ms. Lipa’s hard-earned success to promote and sell Samsung’s products.”
Lipa reportedly first became aware of her appearance on the Samsung television boxes in June 2025. The discovery was amplified by social media, where fans began circulating images of the packaging, colloquially referring to the product as the “Dua Lipa TV Box.” The lawsuit highlights specific social media interactions to demonstrate the commercial impact of the unauthorized use, citing comments from users who expressed an intent to purchase the television specifically because of the singer’s image.
Legal Grounds: Copyright, Trademark, and Likeness
The lawsuit filed by Lipa’s legal team is multi-faceted, targeting several areas of intellectual property law. The complaint includes allegations of:

- Copyright Infringement: Relating to the unauthorized use of the photograph captured at the Austin City Limits Festival.
- Trademark Infringement: Concerning the unauthorized use of her brand identity in a commercial capacity.
- Misappropriation of Likeness and Image: Regarding the use of her physical identity to endorse or promote consumer electronics.
The legal team for the 30-year-old singer has stated that Samsung reportedly ignored “repeated demands” to cease and desist from infringing upon her rights before the matter escalated to a formal lawsuit.
Samsung’s Defense: The Third-Party Argument
Samsung has moved quickly to respond to the allegations, denying any intentional wrongdoing. In a statement provided to the BBC, the company explained that the image used on the packaging was provided to them by a third-party content partner.
The tech giant maintains that it acted in good faith, stating that the image was “used only after receiving explicit assurance from the content partner that permission had been secured.” While Samsung expressed respect for the singer, the company’s position centers on the claim that the responsibility for securing the proper rights lies with the provider of the content rather than the manufacturer using it.
Key Takeaways
- Total Damages Sought: $15 million (£11 million).
- Core Dispute: Unauthorized use of a 2024 Austin City Limits Festival photograph on Samsung TV boxes.
- Legal Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California.
- Samsung’s Stance: The company claims they received “explicit assurance” of permission from a third-party provider.
What Happens Next
The case now moves into the hands of the US District Court for the Central District of California. As the litigation progresses, the court will likely examine the validity of the “explicit assurance” provided by Samsung’s third-party partner and determine whether the tech giant bears legal liability for the copyright and trademark infringements alleged by Lipa’s team.

This case is expected to serve as a significant precedent for how global corporations manage third-party content and the extent of their liability when celebrity likenesses are used in marketing materials.
Stay tuned for further updates as this legal battle develops. We encourage you to share this story and leave your thoughts on the implications for celebrity image rights in the comments below.