Horseracing Integrity Under Fire: Jockey and Associate Found to Have Manipulated Race Outcome
A recent disciplinary hearing has revealed a purposeful attempt to compromise the integrity of a British horserace, shaking confidence in the sport. Former jockey Dylan Kitts and John Higgins were found to have conspired to prevent a horse, Hillsin, from achieving its best possible finish in a handicap hurdle at Worcester in July 2023. this case underscores the British Horseracing Authority’s (BHA) commitment to maintaining a fair and obvious sport.
The Details of the Conspiracy
Kitts initially claimed he intentionally held back Hillsin after receiving threats from Higgins. However, the self-reliant disciplinary panel resolute that Kitts wasn’t genuinely threatened and had the freedom to disregard Higgins’ instructions. This finding is crucial, as it establishes a clear intent to manipulate the race’s outcome.
Higgins, an associate of horse owner Alan Clegg and father-in-law to Premier League footballer Ashley Barnes, played a central role in the scheme. Clegg was not charged in the case,and trainer Chris Honor was cleared of any involvement in the conspiracy itself,though he was found to have misled stewards during the post-race inquiry.
Why This Matters to You
This case isn’t just about one race; it’s about the fundamental trust that underpins all of horseracing. You, as a bettor, a fan, or someone simply interested in fair play, deserve to know that what you’re witnessing is genuine. A compromised race erodes that trust and damages the entire industry.
Here’s what you need to understand about the BHA’s response:
* Serious Breach of Values: The BHA views this type of behavior as a direct attack on the core principles of British racing.
* Upholding Integrity: The authority is dedicated to ensuring that every race is conducted with fairness and transparency.
* Protecting the Sport: Maintaining public confidence is vital for the long-term health and sustainability of horseracing.
Fallout and Next Steps
Currently,Kitts has ceased riding and left the racing world. Higgins was previously barred from BHA-regulated activities for non-cooperation during the examination. Burnley striker Barnes also faced exclusion for failing to provide requested phone records.
A sanctions hearing is scheduled for November to determine the appropriate penalties for Kitts and Higgins. The BHA has made it clear that such actions will not be tolerated.
“Central to the success of British racing is the confidence among those participating, betting and watching our sport that what they are seeing unfold on the track is clean and fair,” a BHA statement affirmed.”The actions of those involved in this case are fundamentally incompatible with British racing’s values.”
This case serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing vigilance required to protect the integrity of horseracing. The BHA’s swift and decisive action demonstrates its commitment to preserving the sport for generations to come.
