Beyond Salmon: Why Eating More Mackerel, Anchovies Could Boost Your Health
For years, salmon has reigned supreme as the go-to fatty fish, lauded for its heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids and overall nutritional value. But a growing body of research suggests we may be overlooking equally – or even more – beneficial options lurking beneath the surface. A new study published in Nature Food reveals that the wild fish used to feed farmed salmon are nutritional powerhouses in their own right, often containing higher concentrations of essential nutrients like calcium, iron, and vitamin B12. Scientists are now encouraging a shift in dietary habits, advocating for increased consumption of species like mackerel, anchovies, and herring, not just for our personal health, but also for the sustainability of our oceans. This isn’t about abandoning salmon altogether, but rather broadening our seafood horizons to maximize nutrient intake and reduce pressure on wild fish stocks.
The research, conducted by scientists at the University of Cambridge, Lancaster University, University of Stirling, and the University of Aberdeen, analyzed the flow of nutrients from wild “feed” fish to farmed salmon. The findings demonstrate a significant loss of key nutrients during the aquaculture process. While farmed salmon remains a valuable source of protein and certain nutrients like selenium and zinc, the study highlights a decrease in six out of nine nutrients examined – calcium, iodine, iron, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin B12, and vitamin A – when comparing the feed fish to the final salmon fillet. This nutrient loss underscores the potential benefits of consuming these smaller, oily fish directly. The study’s lead author, Dr. David Willer of the Zoology Department at the University of Cambridge, explained, “What we’re seeing is that most species of wild fish used as feed have a similar or greater density and range of micronutrients than farmed salmon fillets.”
Nutrient Density: Wild Fish vs. Farmed Salmon
The researchers meticulously calculated the nutrient content of edible portions of whole wild fish – including Pacific and Peruvian anchoveta, Atlantic herring, mackerel, sprat, and blue whiting – used in salmon feed in Norway. They then compared these values to the nutrient profiles of farmed Atlantic salmon fillets. The results were striking. Calcium levels were found to be over five times higher in the wild feed fish, while iodine concentrations were four times greater. Iron, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin B12, and vitamin A were all found to be more than 1.5 times higher in the wild fish. Vitamin D levels were comparable between the two, but zinc and selenium were higher in the farmed salmon, a result attributed to other ingredients included in the salmon’s diet. This increase in zinc and selenium in farmed salmon demonstrates progress in the aquaculture sector’s efforts to enhance the nutritional profile of their product.
The implications of these findings extend beyond individual health. The study points to a concerning trend of diverting valuable marine resources towards fish feed, potentially exacerbating the depletion of wild fish populations. Dr. James Robinson, senior author from Lancaster University, emphasized this point, stating, “Marine fisheries are essential local and global food systems, but large catches are being diverted towards farm feeds. Prioritising nutritious seafood for people can help improve both diets and ocean sustainability.” Consuming one-third of the current supply of food-grade wild feed fish directly, the researchers suggest, would be the most efficient way to maximize nutrient intake from the ocean.
Addressing Nutrient Deficiencies
The study’s findings are particularly relevant in light of widespread nutrient deficiencies in many populations. In the United Kingdom, for example, approximately 71% of adults are estimated to be insufficient in vitamin D during the winter months, according to the National Health Service. NHS Vitamin D Information teenage girls and women often experience deficiencies in iodine, selenium, and iron. However, current dietary habits don’t reflect this need. While 24% of adults in the UK consume salmon weekly, only 5.4% eat mackerel, a mere 1% consume anchovies, and a negligible 0.4% include herring in their diet. This disparity highlights a significant opportunity to improve public health through simple dietary adjustments.
Dr. Willer believes that even small changes in fish consumption can have a substantial impact. “Making a few small changes to our diet around the type of fish that we eat can go a long way to changing some of these deficiencies and increasing the health of both our population and planet,” he stated. The researchers advocate for increased availability and affordability of wild “feed” fish and by-products, encouraging the development of convenient and appealing products for direct human consumption. This could involve innovative processing techniques and marketing strategies to overcome consumer perceptions and increase demand.
The Role of Aquaculture and Nutrient Retention
The study doesn’t advocate for the elimination of salmon farming, but rather for improvements in nutrient retention within the aquaculture process. Dr. Richard Newton of the Institute of Aquaculture at the University of Stirling explained that farmed salmon is already an efficient converter of feed, but further optimization is possible. “Farmed salmon is an excellent source of nutrition, and is one of the best converters of feed of any farmed animal, but for the industry to grow it needs to become better at retaining key nutrients that it is fed,” he said. This can be achieved through more strategic use of feed ingredients, including fishery by-products and sustainably sourced industrial-grade fish like sand eels.
The researchers also propose the adoption of a “nutrient retention metric” alongside the existing “Fish In Fish Out” (FIFO) ratio, a standard measure of feed efficiency in aquaculture. Dr. Willer noted that the aquaculture industry has historically focused on FIFO ratios without adequately considering nutrient loss. “These numbers have been underacknowledged by the aquaculture industry’s standard model of quoting Fish In Fish Out (FIFO) ratios rather than looking at nutrients,” he explained. By incorporating a nutrient retention metric, the industry could become more efficient, reduce its reliance on wild fish stocks, and improve the nutritional value of its products. The team is currently developing a standardized framework for implementing this metric in industry practice.
Looking Ahead: Sustainable Seafood for a Healthier Future
The findings of this study underscore the interconnectedness of human health and ocean sustainability. Prioritizing the direct consumption of nutrient-rich wild fish not only benefits individuals but also reduces the pressure on marine ecosystems. The researchers emphasize the need for a holistic approach to seafood management, balancing the demands of aquaculture with the preservation of wild fish populations. They hope to notice the industry expand responsibly, without compromising the health of our oceans.
The study was funded by the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS), a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship, a Henslow Fellowship at Murray Edwards College, and the University of Cambridge. This collaborative effort highlights the importance of interdisciplinary research in addressing complex challenges related to food security and environmental sustainability.
The researchers are continuing to investigate strategies for improving nutrient retention in aquaculture and promoting the consumption of underutilized fish species. Future research will focus on developing innovative feed formulations and exploring the potential of alternative protein sources. The ultimate goal is to create a more sustainable and nutritious food system that benefits both people and the planet.
Key Takeaways:
- Wild fish used in salmon feed, such as mackerel and anchovies, often contain higher concentrations of essential nutrients than farmed salmon.
- Consuming these “feed” fish directly can help address nutrient deficiencies and improve overall health.
- The aquaculture industry needs to focus on improving nutrient retention in feed to maximize efficiency and reduce reliance on wild fish stocks.
- A new “nutrient retention metric” could help the industry track and improve its performance.
- Prioritizing nutritious seafood for human consumption can contribute to both public health and ocean sustainability.
The team plans to present their findings at upcoming international aquaculture conferences and collaborate with industry stakeholders to implement their recommendations. Further updates on their research and the development of the nutrient retention metric will be available on the University of Cambridge’s Zoology Department website. What changes will you create to your diet to incorporate more of these nutrient-rich fish? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and please share this article with anyone interested in improving their health and supporting sustainable seafood practices.
Related reading