The European Commission approved the acquisition of Electronic Arts (EA) by an investor consortium led by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) on July 23, ruling that the merger does not raise competition concerns. The $55 billion deal, structured as a leveraged buyout, now moves toward a formal close after clearing this significant regulatory hurdle.
The consortium purchasing the gaming giant includes the PIF, private equity firm Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners, an investment firm founded by Jared Kushner. While the European Commission’s approval removes a major legal obstacle, the financial structure of the deal has sparked concerns regarding the future of EA’s workforce and studio stability.
Because the acquisition is a leveraged buyout, the transaction places billions of dollars in debt onto EA’s balance sheet. Industry analysts and insiders suggest this debt load may force the company to implement aggressive cost-cutting measures to service the loans. Potential outcomes include mass layoffs, the cancellation of active game projects, and the closure of specific development studios.
Financial Stakes and the Leveraged Buyout Structure
A leveraged buyout (LBO) occurs when a company is acquired using a significant amount of borrowed money to meet the purchase price. In this case, the $55 billion valuation is supported by debt that EA itself must now carry. This financial pressure often leads new owners to seek immediate efficiencies to ensure debt repayments are met.
EA previously acknowledged the volatility of the situation. In 2025, the company admitted there were inherent risks involved in proceeding with the sale, though it continued to move forward with the consortium. The deal grants the PIF and its partners control over some of the most valuable intellectual properties in gaming, including the Battlefield franchise.
Potential Impact on BioWare and Creative Direction
Internal anxiety is mounting at BioWare, the studio responsible for several high-profile RPG series. According to a report from Insider Gaming, multiple anonymous sources within BioWare expressed belief that their studio could be among the first to face cuts under the new ownership.
One current BioWare developer told Insider Gaming that they have been preparing a professional portfolio and seeking other job opportunities since last year, stating that a reduction in force “feels like a matter of time.”
The concerns extend beyond financial cuts to the creative and ideological direction of the games. BioWare is recognized for inclusive storytelling and pro-diversity characters. Patrick Weekes, a longtime BioWare writer who was laid off in 2025, speculated that the PIF-led ownership might seek to remove “gay stuff” and political themes that conflict with the leadership’s views. Weekes theorized that the new owners might choose to close BioWare entirely to avoid these ideological conflicts.
Public Protest and Corporate Backlash
The acquisition has not been without public opposition. The deal’s association with the Saudi Arabian government and the inclusion of Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners drew criticism from the gaming community. These tensions manifested physically at EA’s California headquarters, where groups of cosplayers staged raids and protests against the sale.
These protests highlight a growing friction between the global gaming community’s values and the strategic investment goals of sovereign wealth funds. For many developers and players, the shift in ownership represents a risk to the creative independence and inclusive nature of modern game development.
No major operational changes, layoffs, or studio closures are expected to be officially announced until the deal formally closes. The next phase involves the finalization of the closing process following the European Commission’s green light.
Readers can follow official filings and company announcements via EA’s investor relations portal for updates on the formal closing date. Share this story and join the conversation in the comments below.
Related reading