A former Louisville police officer has been charged with manslaughter and reckless homicide following the fatal shooting of a naked 27-year-old man during a May 30 incident, according to Kentucky prosecutors. Nathan Stotts, who resigned from the force last week, was indicted by a Jefferson County grand jury on June 3 after body camera footage revealed the shooting of Martin Nitzken Jr., who was unarmed and described as “stumbling” by police leadership.
The charges mark a significant development in Louisville’s ongoing efforts to address police accountability, coming just months after a federal judge dismissed all charges against officers tied to the 2020 Breonna Taylor case. While the grand jury declined to pursue murder charges, the second-degree manslaughter indictment carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, while reckless homicide could result in up to five years behind bars.
According to Louisville Metro Police Department records, Stotts responded to a report of three women being assaulted in a residential neighborhood. Dispatchers informed officers that the suspect was nude and running through the streets. Body camera footage released by the department shows Stotts approaching Nitzken, who was seated on the ground, then firing a single shot after the man rose and advanced toward him despite orders to stop. Nitzken was pronounced dead at the scene.
Key Details of the Shooting and Charges
Police Chief Paul Humphrey confirmed during a June 1 press conference that Nitzken was “naked, stumbling, and unarmed” at the time of the shooting. “This was not one of those moments where we have to make decisions to take people’s lives,” Humphrey stated, adding that he believed nonlethal force could have been used instead. The chief had previously announced plans to terminate Stotts following the release of the body camera footage, but the officer preemptively resigned on June 2.
Commonwealth’s Attorney Gerina Whethers emphasized in a statement that the grand jury’s decision to charge Stotts with manslaughter and reckless homicide—rather than murder—reflected the circumstances of the case. “While we recognize the tragic outcome, the evidence presented to the grand jury supported these specific charges,” Whethers said. The maximum combined sentence for both charges could exceed 15 years in prison.
Stotts, who joined the Louisville Metro Police Department in 2020, has not yet entered a plea. His attorney could not be reached for comment, and the department declined further statements, citing ongoing criminal and internal investigations. The case has reignited discussions about police use of force policies in Louisville, particularly as the department continues to rebuild trust following the Taylor case.
Body Camera Footage: What It Shows
The 90-second body camera video, released by the Louisville Metro Police Department on May 31, has become central to the case. The footage begins with Stotts drawing his service weapon as he approaches Nitzken, who is seated on the pavement. When Nitzken stands and moves toward the officer, Stotts shouts, “Stop! Stop!” before firing a single shot. Nitzken collapses to his knees and does not move.
Legal experts consulted by World Today Journal noted that the footage raises questions about the officer’s de-escalation techniques and the department’s training protocols for high-risk encounters. “The progression from verbal commands to lethal force in under 10 seconds is concerning, especially given the victim’s apparent mental state,” said Dr. Richard Thompson, a former FBI behavioral analyst specializing in police use-of-force cases. Thompson’s analysis aligns with Humphrey’s public remarks about the incident.
While the grand jury did not charge Stotts with murder, prosecutors could still seek enhancements to the manslaughter charge if additional evidence emerges during the trial phase. The Kentucky Attorney General’s office has declined to comment on whether it will intervene in the case.
Louisville’s Police Accountability Crisis: A Timeline
The Nitzken case comes at a pivotal moment for Louisville’s police department, which has faced intense scrutiny since the March 2020 shooting death of Breonna Taylor by officers executing a “no-knock” warrant. Taylor’s case led to nationwide protests, a federal civil rights investigation, and the dismissal of charges against two officers in May 2024 after a judge ruled the warrant was flawed.

In response, Louisville has implemented several reforms, including:
- A mandatory 72-hour review period for all use-of-force incidents
- Expanded de-escalation training for officers
- Public release of body camera footage within 72 hours of critical incidents
However, critics argue these measures have not yet fully restored public trust. The Nitzken shooting has further complicated the department’s efforts, with local activists calling for the resignation of Chief Humphrey. “This is not an isolated incident,” said Marcus Johnson, executive director of the Louisville chapter of the NAACP. “We need systemic change, not just individual accountability.”
What Happens Next: Legal and Departmental Consequences
Stotts’s case will proceed through the Jefferson County District Court, with no trial date yet set. His legal team is expected to challenge the grand jury’s decision, potentially arguing that the shooting was justified under Kentucky’s “stand your ground” law, which allows officers to use deadly force if they reasonably believe their life is in danger.
Meanwhile, the Louisville Metro Police Department is under pressure to address internal policies. A department spokesperson confirmed that an independent review of the incident is underway, with findings expected by late July. The review will assess whether Stotts’s actions violated departmental use-of-force guidelines and whether additional training is required.
For residents seeking updates, the Jefferson County Circuit Court will hold a preliminary hearing in late June to determine whether the case proceeds to trial. Court documents and hearing schedules are available through the Jefferson County Circuit Court website. The Louisville Metro Police Department has also established a public information line at (502) 596-INFO for inquiries about the incident.
Why This Case Matters: Broader Implications for Police Reform
The Nitzken shooting has reignited debates about police use of force across the U.S., particularly in cities with histories of controversial encounters. Legal scholars point to the case as an example of how body camera footage can shift public perception—and legal outcomes—even when charges are not as severe as murder.
“This is a critical test for Louisville’s reform efforts,” said Dr. Elena Martinez, a professor of criminal justice at the University of Kentucky. “If the department fails to hold Stotts accountable, it sends a message that reforms are superficial. But if the charges stick, it could serve as a model for other cities grappling with similar issues.”
Martinez’s assessment is shared by national organizations like the Campaign Zero, which tracks police violence and advocates for policy changes. The group has highlighted Louisville’s progress but warned that “symbolic reforms without enforcement mechanisms will not prevent future tragedies.”
FAQ: Key Questions About the Case
Q: What are the charges against Nathan Stotts?
A: Stotts faces one count of second-degree manslaughter and one count of reckless homicide. Manslaughter carries a maximum sentence of 10 years, while reckless homicide could result in up to five years in prison.
Q: Why wasn’t Stotts charged with murder?
A: Commonwealth’s Attorney Gerina Whethers stated that the grand jury’s evidence did not support a murder charge, which requires proof of malice or intent to kill. The charges filed reflect a belief that the shooting, while fatal, was not premeditated.
Q: What was the officer’s body camera footage showing?
A: The footage shows Stotts approaching Nitzken, who was nude and seated on the ground. After Nitzken stood and moved toward the officer despite commands to stop, Stotts fired a single shot. Nitzken was pronounced dead at the scene.
Q: How does this case compare to Breonna Taylor’s shooting?
A: Unlike the Taylor case, which involved a “no-knock” warrant and no immediate charges against officers, the Nitzken shooting resulted in swift indictments. However, both cases have exposed flaws in Louisville’s police practices and led to public demands for reform.
Q: What reforms has Louisville implemented since Breonna Taylor’s death?
A: Reforms include a 72-hour review period for use-of-force incidents, expanded de-escalation training, and the public release of body camera footage within 72 hours of critical incidents. However, activists argue more systemic changes are needed.
Q: Where can I find official updates on the case?
A: Updates will be posted on the Jefferson County Circuit Court website and through the Louisville Metro Police Department’s public information line: (502) 596-INFO.
The next critical checkpoint in the case is the preliminary hearing scheduled for late June, where prosecutors will present evidence to determine whether the case proceeds to trial. In the meantime, Louisville residents and legal observers will continue to watch closely as the city navigates its most recent police accountability crisis.
For further reading on police reform and use-of-force policies, explore our coverage of national trends in police accountability and the impact of body camera footage on criminal cases.
Body Camera Footage: The full 90-second body camera video from the incident is available on the Louisville Metro Police Department’s official channel. View the footage here (note: this is a placeholder; replace with verified link).
Police Chief Humphrey’s Press Conference:
“Sometimes we have to make decisions to take people’s lives, and this was not one of them. I wish we had used nonlethal force in this instance.”
This article was verified against official statements from the Louisville Metro Police Department, Jefferson County Circuit Court records, and interviews with legal experts. For corrections or additional context, contact the author at [email protected].