Fortnite’s iOS Return Stalled in japan: A Deep Dive into Apple’s App Store Policies and the Ongoing Epic Games Dispute
As of December 18, 2025, at 07:50:43, the anticipated return of Fortnite to Apple’s iOS platform in Japan has been indefinitely postponed. This setback, announced by Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney via his X (formerly Twitter) account (@timsweeneyepic), stems from ongoing disagreements regarding Apple’s in-app payment policies. Sweeney asserts that Apple is imposing a “competition-crushing 21% junk fee” on third-party payment systems, effectively hindering Fortnite’s ability to operate viably on iOS. This situation highlights a critical juncture in the broader debate surrounding app store monopolies and developer rights, impacting the entire mobile gaming ecosystem.The core issue revolves around app store competition, and how Apple’s policies affect developers like Epic Games.
The Context: A Prolonged Legal Battle
The conflict between Epic Games and Apple began in August 2020 when Epic directly challenged Apple’s in-app purchase policies by introducing a direct payment option within Fortnite, bypassing the 30% commission Apple typically charges. This action led to Apple removing fortnite from the App Store, sparking a legal battle that has unfolded across multiple jurisdictions.While a US court ruled largely in Apple’s favor in September 2021,requiring Epic to pay damages,the case also prompted Apple to make some concessions,allowing developers to link to choice payment methods. However, Sweeney argues these changes haven’t gone far enough, particularly regarding the fees associated with processing those alternative payments.
the recent developments in Japan were initially seen as a potential resolution. Following Japan’s amended Competition Law,which came into effect in September 2024,Apple was legally obligated to allow developers to offer alternative app stores and payment systems. The expectation was that Fortnite would return to iOS in Japan, serving as a test case for these new regulations. Though, Sweeney’s statement indicates Apple’s implementation of the law is not meeting the spirit of the legislation.
Apple’s Response and the 21% “Junk Fee”
apple’s position centers on the costs associated with enabling third-party payment systems on its platform. The company maintains that the 21% fee covers the expenses of fraud protection, payment processing, and maintaining the security of the App Store ecosystem. They argue that this fee is significantly lower than the costs they incur and is a reasonable charge for the services provided.
However, Epic Games contends that this fee is excessive and designed to stifle competition. sweeney specifically labels it a “junk fee,” suggesting it lacks a legitimate justification and serves solely to protect Apple’s market dominance. This viewpoint aligns with broader concerns raised by numerous developers and regulators globally regarding the fairness of app store commissions. Recent reports from the Coalition for App Fairness (https://appfairness.org/) echo these concerns, highlighting the financial burden imposed on developers by high app store fees.
Implications for the Mobile gaming Industry and Beyond
The Fortnite situation in Japan is not an isolated incident. It represents a microcosm of the larger struggle for control within the mobile app ecosystem.The implications extend far beyond Fortnite and apple, perhaps reshaping the landscape for all developers and consumers.
Here’s a comparative look at the commission structures of major app stores (data as of December 2025):
| App Store | Standard Commission | Small Business Commission (Revenue ≤ $1M/year) | Alternative Payment Commission |
|---|
![Elementary OS 8.1: Dock Improvements & Default Wayland | [Year] Update](https://i0.wp.com/static0.howtogeekimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/elementary-os-logo.jpg?resize=330%2C220&ssl=1 "Elementary OS 8.1: Dock Improvements & Default Wayland | [Year] Update"){kind=logo}
