Congressional Access Denied,Concerns Rise Over Conditions at San Diego ICE Detention Facility
A growing controversy is unfolding around the San Diego Federal Building,where members of Congress have been repeatedly denied access too inspect conditions within a recently utilized detention area.This situation, coupled with reports from volunteer observers and detained individuals, is raising serious questions about the treatment of those in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody and the agency’s transparency.
As a long-time observer of immigration policy and detention practices, I’ve seen firsthand how crucial oversight is to ensuring humane conditions and accountability.What’s happening in San Diego is deeply concerning, and warrants a closer look.
Mounting Evidence of Concerning Conditions
Reports indicate individuals are being held, sometimes for extended periods, in a basement area of the federal building. Some have reportedly been held on a waiver for up to three days while awaiting formal detention processing. Thes conditions are sparking alarm, especially given allegations of overcrowding and inadequate access to basic necessities.
Volunteer observers have noted a notable increase in detentions at routine check-ins beginning October 9th, with approximately ten individuals taken into custody daily.This number reportedly decreased following initial attempts by Congressional representatives to visit the facility.
Congressional Frustration & Asserted Rights
Four members of Congress – Reps. Juan Vargas, Pete Aguilar, Mike Levin, and Sara Jacobs – attempted to conduct an oversight visit on October 20th, only to be turned away. They initially submitted a request via email with 48-hours notice, a standard practice for federal facility inspections.
Here’s a breakdown of the escalating situation:
* Initial Request: Submitted October 18th for a visit on October 20th.
* First Denial: ICE requested seven days’ notice.
* Follow-Up: A letter signed by four representatives and two California Senators (Adam Schiff and Alex padilla) was sent.
* Second Denial: Requests were reportedly put on hold due to the government shutdown.
Despite these roadblocks, the representatives maintain their legal right to inspect federal facilities at any time. “It’s our responsibility to come down here and look at stuff like this,” stated Rep. Peters, adding he’s “never been turned away” before. Rep. Levin succinctly asserted his right to access, stating, “That’s my notice,” while holding up his congressional ID.
ICE’s Response & lack of Transparency
The Department of Homeland Security, through Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, issued a statement dismissing allegations of substandard conditions as “FALSE.” The statement claims all detainees have “unlimited access to food, water and snacks” and that the food is not spoiled. McLaughlin emphasized the agency’s commitment to the “safety, security and well-being” of those in custody.
However, McLaughlin has repeatedly declined to answer specific questions regarding:
* The number of individuals currently held in the basement.
* The length of time individuals are being detained there.
* Whether detainees have access to beds or showers.
This lack of transparency is fueling concerns and distrust. McLaughlin did state the agency is “working diligently to obtain greater detention space…to house the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.”
The Human Cost & Calls for Accountability
The representatives and volunteer observers paint a different picture. Rep. Jacobs emphasized that those being detained are “literally showing up to the federal building, to the courthouse, to follow the process,” and are being subjected to what she termed “terrorized by this administration.”
Volunteer Brian kougl described the situation as ”very sad,” “frightening,” and “demoralizing.” He questioned ICE’s claims of adequate care,asking,”If that’s what’s happening,why aren’t they letting people come check it out?”
This sentiment was echoed by Rep. Levin, who stated, “there’s no reason they couldn’t have us down there unless there was something they didn’t want us to see. And that should concern every single person here.”
What This Means for You & the Future of Oversight
This situation highlights a critical issue: the importance of self-reliant oversight of immigration detention facilities. When access is denied, and questions go unanswered, it creates an surroundings ripe for abuse and raises serious concerns about due process.
The representatives involved are committed to continuing their push for access and accountability. Rep. Vargas stated, “We’re going






![Anniversary Celebration: [Event Name/Location] Reunion Highlights
or
[Event Name/Location] Anniversary: A Heartwarming Reunion
or
Reunion & Celebration: [Number] Years of [Organization/Event]
or
[Year] Anniversary Reunion: Photos & Stories from [E Anniversary Celebration: [Event Name/Location] Reunion Highlights
or
[Event Name/Location] Anniversary: A Heartwarming Reunion
or
Reunion & Celebration: [Number] Years of [Organization/Event]
or
[Year] Anniversary Reunion: Photos & Stories from [E](https://i0.wp.com/asc-images.forward-publishing.io/2026/01/09/32d4643d-55f0-4915-8c0f-8b38b0ab0e8a.jpg?resize=150%2C100&ssl=1)
