The proposed overhaul of Italy’s gender equality framework, aiming to align with European Union directives, is facing criticism from regional advisors who fear a weakening of local protections against workplace discrimination. At the heart of the debate is a draft decree, dated February 19, 2026, that proposes replacing the existing network of regional and provincial gender equality counselors – the *Consigliere di Parità* – with a centralized “Organism for Equality.” Concerns center on the potential loss of localized expertise and accessibility for those seeking redress against discriminatory practices. This shift in structure, if implemented without adequate safeguards, could undermine decades of progress in promoting equal opportunities, according to legal experts.
The debate underscores a broader tension between streamlining administrative processes to meet EU standards and preserving effective, locally-rooted mechanisms for addressing complex social issues. Italy is currently working to implement Directives 2024/1500 and 1499, issued on May 14, 2024, which aim to strengthen gender equality in the workplace across the European Union. While the intent behind the decree is to modernize and harmonize the system, critics argue that the proposed structure risks creating a disconnect between national policy and the realities on the ground. The core of the disagreement lies in a clause within the draft decree that allows, but does not mandate, the creation of territorial sections under the novel national body.
Marianna Ciambrone, a gender equality counselor for the Province of Lecco, has been a vocal opponent of the proposed changes. She, along with colleagues from other Lombardy provinces and the regional counselor, have formally voiced their concerns, arguing that the optional nature of establishing territorial sections could leave significant gaps in coverage. “The choice of the verb ‘may be constituted’ establishes a mere faculty, incumbent on the relevant territorial bodies, to establish a section of the Organism,” Ciambrone explained, as reported by local news outlets. “With this, in the event of failure to establish the territorial section, the counselors believe that there would be a violation of Article 20, paragraph 2, of European Directive 2024/1500.”
The Risk of Non-Regression and Loss of Local Expertise
Ciambrone’s concerns echo a broader legal principle known as “non-regression,” which dictates that the implementation of EU directives should not lead to a reduction in the level of protection already afforded by member states. The counselors argue that eliminating the regional and provincial offices, or failing to guarantee equivalent local structures, could weaken existing safeguards against discrimination. This principle is fundamental to ensuring that EU directives enhance, rather than diminish, existing protections. The current system, established under Law 7/4/2014, n. 56 (known as the Del Rio Law), has provided a direct point of contact for individuals experiencing discrimination, offering support and guidance at the local level for over 20 years.
The role of the *Consigliere di Parità* extends beyond simply receiving complaints. They actively monitor workplace practices, promote awareness of equal opportunity principles, and work with employers to address discriminatory issues. Ciambrone emphasizes the importance of this localized approach, noting a consistent increase in reported cases of gender discrimination in the Province of Lecco. “The phenomenon of discrimination at work unfortunately remains relevant even at the local level: the cases of gender discrimination reported to the Gender Equality Counselor of the Province of Lecco are constantly increasing,” she stated. “The delicacy of the issues and the timeliness required for their treatment cannot be separated from a constant territorial presence.”
EU Directives and the Italian Response
The impetus for the proposed changes stems from the need to fully implement EU Directive 2006/54/CE and Directive 2010/41/UE, alongside the more recent 2024/1500 directive. Decree 29 April 2022 established parameters for gender equality certification within companies, including the involvement of regional and territorial counselors. The current proposal seeks to consolidate these efforts under a national body, aiming for greater efficiency and consistency in the application of EU law. However, the counselors fear that this centralization will come at the expense of local responsiveness and accessibility.
The Italian government, through the Department for Equal Opportunities within the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, has been tasked with transposing the EU directives into national law. The proposed decree is part of this process, and officials maintain that the intention is to strengthen, not weaken, protections against discrimination. The debate highlights the challenges inherent in balancing the need for national harmonization with the importance of local context and expertise. The National Council for Equality, established under Legislative Decree 198/2006, plays a key role in promoting and monitoring the implementation of equal opportunity principles, but its effectiveness relies on a robust network of regional and local support structures.
Concerns Over Resource Allocation and Independence
A key concern raised by Ciambrone and her colleagues is the lack of guaranteed resources for any territorial sections that *are* established. The draft decree states that sections “may be constituted, in agreement with the Regions and Autonomous Provinces, within the resources available under current legislation.” This ambiguity raises fears that territorial sections will be underfunded and unable to effectively carry out their duties. The counselors emphasize the need for these sections to be directly dependent on the central Organism for Equality, ensuring their independence and impartiality. They recommend that the decree be amended to *require* the establishment of territorial sections, with dedicated funding streams from the central body.
The potential impact extends beyond individual cases of discrimination. The *Consigliere di Parità* similarly play a crucial role in promoting work-life balance and addressing issues such as maternity leave and parental rights. The counselors argue that a centralized system may be less attuned to the specific needs of different regions and communities, hindering efforts to create a truly inclusive and equitable workplace. The ongoing discussion reflects a broader debate about the optimal structure for promoting gender equality in Italy, balancing the demands of EU law with the need for effective local implementation.
What Happens Next?
The draft decree is currently under review, and further consultations with regional and provincial stakeholders are expected. The final version will need to be approved by the Italian Parliament before it can be implemented. The timeline for this process remains uncertain, but it is anticipated that a final decision will be reached before the complete of 2026. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the future of gender equality protections in Italy, shaping the landscape of workplace rights and opportunities for years to come. The concerns raised by counselors like Marianna Ciambrone underscore the importance of preserving local expertise and ensuring that the implementation of EU directives does not inadvertently weaken existing safeguards.
As the debate continues, it is crucial to monitor developments closely and advocate for a system that effectively protects the rights of all workers, regardless of gender. The success of Italy’s efforts to align with EU standards will depend on finding a balance between national harmonization and local responsiveness, ensuring that the principles of equality and non-discrimination are upheld across the country.
Do you have thoughts on the proposed changes to Italy’s gender equality framework? Share your comments below, and please share this article with your network to raise awareness of this important issue.