Teh Public has a Right to know: Why Tracking FBI Director Patel’s Flights isn’t cowardly – It’s Openness
FBI Director Kash Patel is facing scrutiny for his use of a Gulfstream G550 jet, a 15-passenger aircraft owned by the department of Justice. Reports indicate he’s utilized this luxury plane for personal trips, including visits to his girlfriend, an aspiring country musician. In response to public tracking of his flights, Patel has labeled those doing so as “dangerous and cowardly.” However, this reaction fundamentally misunderstands – and attempts to undermine – a crucial pillar of government accountability.
Let’s be clear: tracking flights is not only legal,it’s a vital component of ensuring transparency in how our government operates.
The ability to monitor aircraft stems from a simple, safety-driven regulation. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires all aircraft to be trackable to prevent collisions. This is achieved through transponders, devices that continuously broadcast GPS coordinates, altitude, and speed.Thanks to Automatic dependent surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) technology, this data is unencrypted and accessible to anyone with the right equipment – or, increasingly, through readily available online platforms. As the FAA states, ADS-B “improves safety and efficiency… reduces costs, and lessens harmful effects on the habitat.”
This open-source data isn’t just for aviation enthusiasts. A growing community of researchers, journalists, and concerned citizens utilize it to monitor everything from the movements of foreign officials and military operations to the travel habits of corporate leaders. And now, the travel of the FBI Director.
Why is this vital? Because the ability to track private flights provides undeniable public value. We’ve seen it used to expose the travel of russian oligarchs, shed light on the CIA’s controversial rendition program, and even calculate the carbon footprint of high-profile figures like Taylor Swift.
This isn’t a new battle.Those who benefit from the secrecy of private travel consistently push back against transparency. Elon Musk, for example, threatened legal action and banned users from his platform, X (formerly Twitter), for sharing the location of his private jet, framing it as a security risk – even suggesting it was akin to publishing “assassination coordinates.”
The irony is palpable.Just two years before assuming his current role, Patel himself criticized then-FBI Director Christopher Wray for using a “taxpayer funded private jet,” relying on the very same public tracking data he now condemns.
Recent examples highlight the issue. In October, flight data showed Patel’s jet traveling to State College, Pennsylvania, near a Penn State arena where his girlfriend performed at a wrestling event. The jet then continued to Nashville, where she resides. Patel’s subsequent online outburst, attacking the scrutiny of thes flights, underscores his discomfort with public accountability.
While Patel is required by federal policy to use the jet for all travel, including personal trips, he is also obligated to reimburse the DOJ for these expenses. Crucially,the FBI has yet to respond to inquiries regarding whether Patel has fulfilled this reimbursement requirement.
Plane-tracking websites aggregate data from multiple sources, often directly from the FAA. While jet owners can request to
