protecting Young People’s First Amendment Rights Online: A 2025 Update
Across the United States, a wave of state laws aimed at regulating social media access for minors is raising serious constitutional concerns. At the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), we’ve been actively challenging these laws in court, arguing thay infringe upon fundamental First Amendment rights – not just for young people, but for all users. This article details our efforts in 2025 and why these laws are a misguided approach to online safety.
The Core Issue: Censorship vs. Safety
the debate centers on how best to protect children online. While the intention behind these laws is laudable,the methods employed – primarily age verification and outright bans or parental permission requirements – are deeply problematic. They represent a form of censorship that undermines the very principles of free expression.
Minors have always possessed the same First Amendment rights as adults. This includes the right to express themselves, engage in political discourse, explore diverse viewpoints, and connect with communities online. The internet hasn’t changed these rights; it’s simply expanded the avenues for exercising them.
How These Laws Work (and Why They’re Flawed)
Most of these state laws share two key characteristics:
* Age Verification: they mandate social media platforms to determine the age of their users.
* Restricted Access: They either prohibit minors from accessing social media altogether or require parental consent.
These requirements, while seemingly straightforward, create a cascade of negative consequences.
EFF’s Legal Challenges in 2025
Throughout 2025, EFF filed amicus briefs - “friend of the court” arguments – in numerous cases across the country. We argued that these laws violate the First Amendment rights of both young people and adults. Our briefs were submitted in:
* California (twice)
* Florida
* Georgia
* Mississippi
* Ohio
* Tennessee
* texas
* Utah
We weren’t alone in this fight. The ACLU, Center for Democracy & Technology, Freedom to Read Foundation, LGBT Technology Institute, TechFreedom, and Woodhull Freedom Foundation joined us in many of these cases, demonstrating a broad coalition concerned about these overreaching laws.
why a “Kid Exception” to the First Amendment Doesn’t Exist
The Supreme Court has consistently rejected attempts to curtail the First Amendment rights of minors. There’s no legal basis for treating young people as second-class citizens when it comes to free speech.
Banning young people from social media is a drastic measure that doesn’t address the real risks they face online. A more effective approach involves strengthening privacy protections and empowering young people with the tools to navigate the digital world safely.
The Broader Impact: Beyond Young Users
These laws aren’t just about restricting access for minors. They create significant burdens for all users, including adults. Consider these consequences:
* Privacy Risks: Age verification systems require the collection of sensitive personal details, increasing the risk of data breaches and identity theft. These laws often require companies to collect more data, especially from children, making them more vulnerable.
* Discrimination & Inaccuracy: ID-based verification can exclude individuals who lack acceptable forms of identification.Biometric systems are frequently enough inaccurate and can be discriminatory.
* Chilling Effect on Speech: Requiring identification before speaking online discourages anonymous expression, which is crucial for whistleblowers, activists, and those who fear retaliation.
* Security Concerns: The increased collection of personal data creates a larger target for malicious actors.
A Better Path Forward
Instead of censorship, lawmakers should focus on:
* Robust Privacy Laws: Protecting user data is paramount.
* Digital Literacy Education: Empowering young people to make informed decisions online.
* Stronger Data Security Standards: Holding social media companies accountable for protecting user information.
* Addressing Online Harms Directly: Focusing on harmful conduct, not restricting access to platforms.
EFF’s Commitment
The EFF remains dedicated to defending the rights of both minors and adults to access the internet, speak freely, and organize online.We will continue to challenge these unconstitutional laws in court and advocate for policies that promote both safety and freedom in the digital age.
**Learn More
Keep reading