Mounting Concerns Over Sexual Abuse & Harassment Allegations Within Los Angeles County Jails
recent data and autonomous oversight reports paint a troubling picture of sexual abuse and harassment within Los Angeles County jails, raising serious questions about the thoroughness and impartiality of investigations conducted by the Sheriff’s Department. A surge in reported incidents, coupled with a strikingly low rate of “substantiated” claims – particularly those involving allegations against staff – is fueling calls for independent oversight and a critical review of current policies and procedures.
A Critically important increase in Reported Incidents
Between January 2022 and June 2025, the Sheriff’s Department recorded 296 inmate-on-inmate allegations of sexual abuse or harassment, with onyl 28 ultimately classified as “substantiated.” However, the situation appears to be escalating.A three-month period from July to September 2025 saw a dramatic increase to 82 inmate-on-inmate allegations, resulting in five substantiated claims of sexual abuse and five of sexual harassment.
Perhaps more concerning is the volume of allegations leveled against staff. During the same July-September 2025 timeframe, inmates filed 121 sexual abuse and harassment claims against Sheriff’s Department personnel. Crucially, none of these claims have been substantiated by the department.
The Question of Impartiality & the Role of the District Attorney
This disparity has prompted significant scrutiny from the Civilian Oversight Commission. Co-vice-chair Arthur Calloway directly questioned the Sheriff’s Department’s ability to objectively investigate claims against its own employees, stating that a lack of substantiated cases suggests a systemic issue. “If it was all objective, there would be some substantiated ones actually to trickle out,” he argued.
Sheriff’s Department officials, lead by PREA coordinator Barkley, attribute the low substantiation rate to the District Attorney’s (D.A.) prosecutorial decisions. Barkley explained that if the D.A. declines to pursue criminal charges, the Sheriff’s department considers the case “unsubstantiated.”
The L.A. County District Attorney’s office confirms this process, outlining that the Sheriff’s Department conducts initial internal investigations before potentially presenting cases to their Justice System integrity Division (JSID) for criminal review. The D.A.’s office emphasizes that “substantiated” and “unsubstantiated” are administrative classifications used by the Sheriff’s Department, distinct from the legal standard of proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” required for criminal charges.They also retain the option to pursue administrative discipline independently of criminal prosecution.
A Disconnect Between administrative Findings and Legal Outcomes
This explanation, however, doesn’t fully address the concerns raised by oversight bodies. The Sheriff’s Department reports that since January 2022, only four cases have led to administrative investigations, with five currently under review by the Internal Criminal Investigations Bureau – and none have been substantiated. The department acknowledges that securing substantiation is challenging, requiring both cooperation and concrete evidence. They also suggest that the threshold for “unsubstantiated” allegations is lower.
This distinction between administrative findings and legal outcomes is a critical point. While a case may not meet the high bar for criminal prosecution, a lack of any substantiated administrative findings raises questions about the thoroughness of the initial investigations and the potential for bias.
Calls for Independent Examination & PREA compliance
Independent observers echo these concerns. Dara Williams, assistant inspector general, argues that investigations should be conducted by individuals “outside the chain of command” to mitigate potential bias in determining which complaints warrant investigation.
Inspector General Max Huntsman goes further, asserting that the Sheriff’s Department is “not in compliance with PREA [Prison Rape Elimination Act] in many senses,” citing deficiencies in internal policies and the physical conditions of aging correctional facilities. PREA, a federal law, mandates standards for preventing, detecting, and responding to sexual abuse and harassment in correctional settings.
Transparency & Accountability: The Path Forward
The Sheriff’s Department maintains that all allegations are recorded in a dedicated database and automatically reported to leadership and the inspector general’s office. However, transparency and accountability remain central to addressing the growing concerns.
At a recent public meeting, Civilian Oversight Commission chair Johnson underscored the urgency of the situation, stating, “it is unacceptable to have no substantiated cases reported.” he called on the Sheriff’s Department to implement measures ensuring fair and thorough reviews of all inmate allegations.
What This means for Los Angeles County
The situation demands a comprehensive and independent review of the Sheriff’s Department’s policies and procedures regarding sexual abuse and harassment
Keep reading