Camilo Huerta’s Job Loss: Responsibility Lies with Professional Conduct, Not Marité Matus, Claims Close Friend
Recent reports suggested that Marité Matus, the former wife of Chilean television personality Camilo Huerta, was responsible for his dismissal from his position as a personal trainer. However, Gissella Gallardo, a close friend of Matus, has publicly refuted these claims, asserting that Huerta’s termination stemmed from issues with his professional responsibility, not any interference from his ex-wife. The controversy unfolded on the Chilean television program “Hay que decirlo,” sparking a debate about the circumstances surrounding Huerta’s departure from his job and the ongoing fallout from their highly publicized split.
The initial allegations, brought forth by journalist Manuel González on “Hay que decirlo,” centered on the idea that Matus disapproved of Huerta training certain female clients. González suggested that Matus allegedly “prohibited” or “raised objections” to Huerta’s work with these individuals, ultimately impacting his employment. This narrative quickly gained traction, fueled by the already tense atmosphere surrounding the couple’s divorce and subsequent financial disputes. However, Gallardo swiftly countered these assertions, presenting a different perspective on the situation and defending Matus’s character.
Gallardo emphatically stated that Matus met Huerta while he was already working as a trainer and never attempted to hinder his career. “Marité met him working. Her intention was not for him to stop working, not at all,” Gallardo said, according to reports from TVMAS. She further revealed that Matus possesses documentation – his termination paperwork – that explicitly outlines the reason for his dismissal: a lack of professional responsibility. This claim directly contradicts the narrative that Matus played a role in his job loss.
Financial Strain and Relationship Breakdown
The dispute over Huerta’s employment comes amidst ongoing financial disagreements between the former couple. Marité Matus filed a complaint against Huerta regarding financial matters, which reportedly contributed to the breakdown of their marriage, which lasted only a few months despite a three-year relationship. Reports indicate that Matus provided significant financial support to Huerta during their relationship, potentially ranging from 3 to 5 million Chilean pesos monthly, in addition to covering expenses like credit lines, travel and clothing. According to T13, Matus as well retained ownership of a business and continued to cover Huerta’s apartment payments, essentially providing comprehensive financial support.
The financial dynamic of their relationship appears to have been a key factor in its eventual collapse. Gallardo suggested that Matus’s generosity stemmed from a desire to see Huerta succeed, but this support seemingly did not translate into reciprocal effort or responsibility on Huerta’s part. Further fueling the narrative of financial imbalance, reports from the podcast Quién es 1, as reported by TVMAS, indicate that Huerta was often absent from the gym, prioritizing social media content creation over his training duties. He reportedly spent limited time with clients, often arriving for a few hours in the morning to record content before returning home.
Lack of Commitment and Attempts at Reconciliation
Pablo Candia, the host of Quién es 1, detailed a pattern of disengagement from Huerta, stating that Matus repeatedly urged him to be more proactive and contribute more to the household, but her pleas largely went unheeded. This lack of commitment reportedly created tension within the relationship, ultimately leading Matus to seek couples therapy in an attempt to salvage their marriage. However, Gallardo revealed that Huerta was reluctant to participate fully in therapy, and Matus ultimately attended sessions alone, hoping to address the issues and improve their family dynamic.
The decision to pursue therapy underscores Matus’s efforts to resolve the problems within the relationship, despite Huerta’s apparent lack of engagement. This detail further supports the narrative that the breakdown of their marriage was not solely attributable to external factors, such as Matus’s alleged interference in his work, but rather to internal issues related to commitment and responsibility. The fact that Matus continued to seek solutions even after recognizing Huerta’s disinterest highlights her dedication to the relationship, at least initially.
Pre-Marital Doubts and a Hastily Planned Wedding
Adding another layer to the story, Gallardo revealed that Matus harbored doubts even before their wedding in January 2024. According to Gallardo, Matus confided in close friends about her reservations, but ultimately proceeded with the marriage due to the logistical complexities of having Huerta’s family travel from abroad and the extensive preparations already in place. “The day before the wedding, she had doubts. Several of us knew, but clearly she felt responsible for the fact that Camilo’s family was coming from outside of Chile and that everything was arranged,” Gallardo explained, as reported by 13.cl. This suggests that Matus may have entered the marriage with underlying concerns, which were perhaps overshadowed by external pressures and commitments.
The couple’s marriage lasted approximately a year and a half before their separation in 2025, marking one of the most prominent breakups in Chilean entertainment news. The subsequent legal and financial disputes have only amplified the public scrutiny surrounding their failed relationship. The revelation of pre-marital doubts adds a poignant dimension to the story, suggesting that the seeds of their eventual separation were sown long before the divorce proceedings began.
Key Takeaways
- The claim that Marité Matus caused Camilo Huerta’s job loss has been refuted by a close friend, Gissella Gallardo.
- Huerta’s termination was reportedly due to a lack of professional responsibility, as indicated in his termination paperwork.
- Financial imbalances and a lack of commitment from Huerta contributed to the breakdown of their marriage.
- Matus attempted to salvage the relationship through couples therapy, but Huerta’s disengagement hindered the process.
- Matus reportedly had pre-marital doubts but proceeded with the wedding due to logistical considerations and family commitments.
As the legal proceedings continue, further details regarding the financial settlements and the circumstances surrounding Huerta’s employment are likely to emerge. The case serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of relationships, the importance of financial transparency, and the consequences of professional misconduct. The next step in this ongoing saga will likely be further legal filings and potentially a court hearing to resolve the outstanding financial disputes between Matus and Huerta. Readers are encouraged to share their thoughts and perspectives on this developing story in the comments below.