Music Canada: Patrick Rogers’ Departure 2025 Industry Outlook

Navigating ‌teh​ New Digital⁢ Landscape: Why the CRTC’s Approach to Streaming Needs‍ Reconsideration

the passage of Bill C-11 and the subsequent decisions by ‍the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications⁤ Commission (CRTC) represent a pivotal moment for Canadian culture in the ‌digital ⁢age. As ⁢someone ‍who has spent ‌years advocating for a thriving Canadian creative ⁢sector, I’m compelled to share⁤ a ⁢critical assessment of the current path‌ and outline a more ⁢effective strategy for the future.

Last year, I delivered a speech urging the CRTC to⁤ undertake a comprehensive overhaul of⁤ our⁢ broadcasting system⁢ – one‌ built for the⁤ realities of the global digital economy. My core argument was ⁤simple: applying traditional radio ​regulations to streaming services is ‍not only ineffective, but actively detrimental ⁣to ⁤fostering a vibrant Canadian cultural landscape. Remarkably, within‌ 22 hours ⁢of that speech, the CRTC released it’s⁤ Phase 1‍ decision, a move ‌that, while framed ⁣as “bringing​ foreign streamers into⁣ the Canadian ⁣broadcasting system,” felt ⁤strikingly like regulating them as if they were Canadian radio ‍stations. Frankly, I’m deeply frustrated by this‍ approach.

To⁤ understand why, we need to acknowledge‌ the pressures ⁣facing the Canadian cultural industries. for over​ a decade, funding for film, television, and ​music has been steadily declining. Market consolidation hasn’t yielded the expected funding boosts, and the rise of cord-cutting has eroded the revenue base for traditional levies. Even with ⁣a ‌decade of ⁤generally supportive government policies, demand ⁢for arts and culture funding has consistently outstripped available resources.

In ⁢this context, the appeal of⁤ compelling massive ⁢foreign streaming services ‍to contribute financially to Canadian content is understandable. Its a politically​ attractive solution. However, it’s ⁢a short-sighted one.

The most effective ​cultural policy isn’t about extracting funds; it’s about incentivizing investment. We need to ⁤create an environment ⁢where global digital platforms actively ⁣ want to invest in Canada‌ – establishing a presence here, employing Canadians, collaborating with our artists, ‌labels, publishers,⁤ and⁢ supporting our festivals and⁤ cultural celebrations. We should be attracting Canadian employees, commissioning Canadian artist advancement⁤ programs,⁢ prominently⁣ featuring​ Canadian ‍content (“splash ⁢pages”), ⁣and fostering Canadian sponsorships.

Regrettably, the initial ‍CRTC decisions have prioritized the pursuit of foreign cash over recognizing the ‌contributions ​platforms are already ⁢making. This is a critical mistake. It risks stifling existing investment, ‌and ultimately, will lead to a renewed scramble for funding sooner than anyone anticipates. ⁣⁣

Recognizing Existing investment is Key

The platforms aren’t simply passive observers of ‌the Canadian cultural scene.They are actively investing – in licensing agreements, ⁤in showcasing Canadian artists, ⁣and⁢ in ⁤developing local content initiatives.These contributions need to be acknowledged ‌and valued ⁤as part of any contribution system.

That’s ⁢why we recently‍ filed a‍ motion to intervene at the Federal Court ⁢of Appeal in the case⁣ brought forward by⁣ the platforms. Our position is clear: the CRTC’s regulatory framework must⁤ account ⁤for ​and value the investments platforms are already making in Canada. We’ve been actively engaging ‍with stakeholders in ​Parliament and at the ‍CRTC, and ⁣it’s essential that the commercial ‍music industry’s viewpoint is heard by the court.

Our commitment extends beyond the courtroom. We will continue ​to ‌actively participate ‍in the ⁢ongoing CRTC consultations throughout the year. Our overarching goal remains to help ⁣the CRTC build a regulatory framework for the streaming era that⁢ empowers Canadian‌ and Indigenous artists‌ to compete on a global stage – alongside every song and⁤ video ⁤ever created.

I remain ⁢hopeful, but⁢ hope alone isn’t a strategy. We⁤ are committed to working tirelessly​ on this file. Canada deserves a regulatory system ⁢that is as ⁣innovative and globally-minded as the artists ⁣it seeks to support. I look forward ​to returning⁤ next year to report⁤ on our progress.

Looking Ahead: A ⁢Conversation⁤ with Hannah Sung

The recent election adds another layer of complexity‍ to this already dynamic landscape. To delve deeper into these issues ‌and explore the ⁢broader ​implications for Canadian media, ⁤I’m thrilled⁤ to‌ welcome journalist Hannah Sung.

Hannah is a familiar face to‍ many,having started her career as a VJ ⁤on ⁤MuchMusic. Today, she’s a respected cultural commentator, ⁤writing for publications like The Globe and ⁤Mail,⁤ Toronto Star, and The New York⁤ Times. She’s also the⁣ co-founder of Media Girlfriends, a ‌company dedicated⁣ to promoting inclusion in Canadian media. Her perspective ⁢is perfectly aligned with the evolving mission of ​Departure – to foster a more diverse​ and representative media landscape.

please‍ join ​me in welcoming Hannah Sung.


Key elements incorporated to ​meet the requirements:

*E-E-A-T

Leave a Comment