San Francisco – The world of prediction markets is rapidly gaining traction, attracting attention not only from specialized platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket but now, the established financial heavyweight Nasdaq. In a move signaling a potential shift in the landscape of event-based trading, Nasdaq filed a proposed rule change with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 2, 2026, to list and trade “Outcome-Related Options” (OROs). This foray into prediction markets underscores the growing interest in these platforms, despite ongoing scrutiny regarding their regulatory status and potential for misuse.
The proposed OROs would allow investors to take positions on whether the settlement price of an underlying contract will fall above or below a predetermined strike price at expiration, with payouts ranging from $0.01 to $1.00. Nasdaq’s initial focus is on the Nasdaq-100 Index, which comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the exchange – including tech giants like Apple, Nvidia, Meta, Amazon, and Tesla – and the Nasdaq-100 Micro, a smaller index geared towards smaller trades. This strategy directly mirrors the structure of existing prediction markets, offering a similar binary option format where traders essentially bet on “yes” or “no” outcomes. The move comes as other exchanges, such as Cboe Global Markets, are also exploring similar offerings, indicating a broader industry interest in capturing a share of this emerging market.
Nasdaq’s Bid to Compete with Established Prediction Markets
For years, platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have operated in a relatively niche space, allowing users to trade on the probabilities of future events – from political elections to economic indicators. Kalshi, founded in 2018, and Polymarket, also established in 2018, have gained prominence for their ability to accurately forecast outcomes, including the 2024 presidential election and the 2025 New York City mayoral race. However, these platforms operate under the regulatory oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while Nasdaq, as a stock exchange, falls under the jurisdiction of the SEC. This jurisdictional difference has been a point of contention, with SEC Chair Paul Atkins acknowledging in a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee hearing last month that coordinating between the two agencies is a “huge issue.” The SEC and CFTC are reportedly meeting weekly to address this challenge and work towards greater harmonization.
Nasdaq’s entry into the market is a direct challenge to Kalshi and Polymarket’s dominance. By offering OROs regulated by the SEC, Nasdaq aims to attract a broader investor base and leverage its established infrastructure and reputation. The appeal lies in the accessibility and simplicity of these outcome-based options. The fixed payout structure, ranging from $0.01 to $1.00, makes it easy for traders to understand the potential gains and losses, mirroring the user experience on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. This accessibility, combined with the backing of a major exchange, could significantly expand the reach of prediction markets to a wider audience.
Growing Mainstream Acceptance and Media Partnerships
The increasing mainstream acceptance of prediction markets is evident in the growing number of partnerships with major media organizations. CNN partnered with Kalshi in 2025, and the Golden Globes collaborated with Polymarket earlier in 2026. Most recently, the Associated Press announced on March 3, 2026, that it will provide Kalshi with data and race calls for national and state elections, further lending credibility to the platform. The AP’s partnership signifies a growing trust in the accuracy and reliability of prediction markets as sources of information.
These partnerships are not without their critics. Concerns remain about the potential for manipulation and insider trading, particularly when markets involve significant global events. While both Kalshi and Polymarket publicly discourage insider trading, Polymarket’s user guide explicitly encourages individuals with specialized knowledge to leverage their expertise for profit, stating, “If you’re an expert on a certain topic, Polymarket is your opportunity to profit from trading based on your knowledge, while improving the market’s accuracy.” This stance has raised eyebrows among regulators and critics who fear it could incentivize the use of non-public information.
Regulatory Hurdles and Concerns Over Insider Trading
The SEC’s review of Nasdaq’s proposed rule change will be crucial in determining the future of outcome-related options. The agency will likely scrutinize the potential risks associated with these products, including the possibility of market manipulation and the necessitate for robust investor protection measures. The jurisdictional overlap between the SEC and CFTC also presents a challenge, requiring close coordination to ensure consistent regulation and oversight. The outcome of this review could set a precedent for other exchanges seeking to enter the prediction market space.
The potential for insider trading remains a significant concern. Critics point to examples of markets involving sensitive events, such as the downfall of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro or potential U.S. Military actions, as areas particularly vulnerable to manipulation. While both Kalshi and Polymarket have implemented measures to detect and prevent illicit activity, the inherent nature of prediction markets – relying on anticipating future events – makes them susceptible to abuse. The SEC will need to carefully consider these risks and establish clear guidelines to mitigate them.
The Future of Prediction Markets
Nasdaq’s move represents a significant step towards the mainstreaming of prediction markets. The involvement of a major exchange like Nasdaq could attract institutional investors and increase liquidity, further solidifying the market’s legitimacy. However, the success of OROs will depend on the SEC’s approval and the implementation of effective regulatory safeguards. The ongoing coordination between the SEC and CFTC will be critical in establishing a clear and consistent regulatory framework for these emerging markets.
The broader implications of this trend are far-reaching. Prediction markets have the potential to provide valuable insights into public sentiment and future events, offering a unique forecasting tool for businesses, policymakers, and investors. However, it is essential to address the inherent risks and ensure that these markets operate with transparency and integrity. As prediction markets continue to evolve, it will be crucial to strike a balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors.
The SEC is expected to announce a decision on Nasdaq’s proposed rule change in the coming months. Investors and market participants will be closely watching the outcome, as it could shape the future of event-based trading and the role of prediction markets in the financial landscape. The ongoing debate surrounding regulation and the potential for insider trading will undoubtedly continue, requiring ongoing vigilance and adaptation from both regulators and market participants.
Key Takeaways:
- Nasdaq has filed with the SEC to launch “Outcome-Related Options” (OROs), directly competing with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket.
- The proposed OROs would allow trading on the probability of events related to the Nasdaq-100 Index and Nasdaq-100 Micro.
- Regulatory coordination between the SEC and CFTC is a key challenge, as the agencies have differing jurisdictions over prediction markets.
- Concerns remain about the potential for insider trading and market manipulation, requiring robust investor protection measures.
- Growing partnerships between prediction markets and major media organizations signal increasing mainstream acceptance.
What are your thoughts on Nasdaq’s entry into the prediction market space? Share your comments below, and let’s discuss the potential implications for investors and the future of financial forecasting.
Related reading