“Nuremberg”: A Timely, Though Imperfect, Examination of Evil and Accountability
The echoes of history ofen feel distant, muffled by time. But the new film, “Nuremberg,” serves as a stark, unsettling reminder that the seeds of atrocity aren’t confined to the past. Released at a moment when the specter of extremism feels increasingly present, the film isn’t merely a past drama; itS a cautionary tale, echoing the warning issued in 1947’s “22 Cells in Nuremberg” – a warning that, disturbingly, remains relevant today. It forces us to confront a arduous truth: the potential for darkness resides within us all, and complacency can allow it to flourish.
“Nuremberg” meticulously recreates the atmosphere surrounding the landmark 1945-1946 trials,focusing not just on the courtroom theatrics,but on the complex psychological landscape of those involved. it’s a film that understands the Nuremberg trials weren’t simply about prosecuting monsters, but about grappling with the terrifying realization that people – flawed, complex individuals – were capable of orchestrating unimaginable horrors. As the film powerfully illustrates, echoing the impact of the documentary footage included within, the architects of the Final Solution weren’t otherworldly beings, but human beings who made choices.
The film’s strength lies in its nuanced portrayal of this humanity,even within the perpetrators. Justice Robert Jackson, brilliantly embodied by Michael Shannon, embodies the unwavering commitment to the rule of law. He’s a man driven by a moral imperative, refusing to let logistical nightmares or international pressures derail the pursuit of justice. Shannon delivers a performance of quiet intensity, conveying the weight of responsibility and the sheer audacity of attempting to hold the most powerful figures of a defeated regime accountable.
Opposite him, Russell Crowe delivers a commanding performance as Hermann Göring, the highest-ranking Nazi official on trial. Crowe doesn’t portray Göring as a caricature of evil, but as a chillingly charismatic and intellectually formidable man. The film wisely avoids simplistic demonization,rather presenting Göring as a disturbingly normal individual,wich,paradoxically,makes his crimes all the more horrifying. The climactic courtroom confrontation between Jackson and Göring is a masterclass in acting,a riveting battle of wills that underscores the film’s central theme: the banality of evil.
Though, “nuremberg” isn’t without its flaws. The narrative also follows Dr. Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek), a US psychiatrist tasked with evaluating the defendants. Malek’s performance is energetic and unsettling, capturing Kelley’s descent into a dangerously close relationship with his patients, driven by a scientific curiosity that borders on obsession. While the storyline is based on a true account, it feels somewhat unbalanced alongside the central Jackson-Göring dynamic.
director Robert Vanderbilt attempts to imbue the film with a vintage aesthetic, utilizing a desaturated color palette to evoke the feel of faded archival photographs. While the intention is admirable, the result is frequently enough visually drab, detracting from the film’s emotional impact. Furthermore, the film suffers from a cluttered narrative, introducing subplots that feel underdeveloped and ultimately distract from the core story.
Perhaps the most significant shortcoming lies in the treatment of the female characters. Lydia Peckham, a journalist, and Justice Jackson’s legal clerk, wrenn Schmidt, are relegated to largely superficial roles, existing primarily to serve the male protagonists. Their motivations and inner lives remain unexplored, a frustrating omission that feels particularly jarring in a film dealing with themes of justice and accountability. These characters deserve more than fleeting appearances and functional roles.
Despite these shortcomings, “Nuremberg” remains a profoundly important film. It’s a timely reminder that the fight against extremism is never truly over, and that vigilance, coupled with a steadfast commitment to the rule of law, is essential.The film’s message, though ultimately delivered somewhat belatedly, resonates deeply in our current cultural moment. It’s a sobering reminder that the “canary in the coal mine” has been silent for too long, and that we must heed its warning before it’s too late.
‘Nuremberg’ – Details for Viewers
* Rating: PG-13 (for violent content involving the Holocaust, strong disturbing images, suicide, some language, smoking and brief drug content)
* runtime: 2 hours, 28 minutes
* Release Date: In wide release Friday, Nov. 7
About the Author: [YourName/bio[YourName/bio[YourName/bio[YourName/bio
