New York City’s subway workers are once again pressing state lawmakers to mandate two-person crews on all trains, a move that comes as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) explores expanding one-person train operation (OPTO). The Transport Workers Union (TWU) Local 100, representing the vast majority of the city’s transit employees, argues that maintaining a conductor on every train is crucial for passenger safety and system security, particularly as automation increases within the network.
The renewed push for legislation follows a veto last year by New York Governor Kathy Hochul of a bill that would have required two-person crews on all subway trains, including those currently operating with a single employee. The governor cited an estimated $10 million cost to implement the change, a figure the union disputes, arguing that the benefits of enhanced safety and security outweigh the financial implications. This latest effort coincides with upcoming contract negotiations between the TWU and the MTA, where the expansion of OPTO is expected to be a key point of contention.
The debate over crew size is not new. For decades, New York City’s subway system has relied on a two-person crew – a train operator and a conductor – to ensure smooth and safe operations. Conductors are responsible for tasks such as opening and closing train doors, making passenger announcements, and responding to emergencies. However, the MTA has been gradually expanding OPTO, particularly on newer lines equipped with modern signaling systems, arguing that it improves efficiency and reduces costs. The union contends that reducing staffing levels compromises safety and leaves passengers vulnerable.
Hochul’s Veto and the Push for Legislative Action
Governor Hochul’s December 2025 veto of the two-person crew bill sparked immediate criticism from the TWU and its allies. The legislation, passed by the state legislature, aimed to reverse the trend toward OPTO and ensure that all trains, including shuttle services and those running on lines with lower ridership, were staffed with both a train operator and a conductor. In her veto message, Hochul argued that the bill would impose unnecessary costs on the MTA and hinder its ability to modernize the subway system. The New York Times reported on the veto and the ensuing debate.
Now, the union is attempting to circumvent the governor’s opposition by seeking a new bill that would essentially lock in the current staffing levels, mandating conductors only on trains that currently have them. This strategy aims to prevent the MTA from further expanding OPTO without legislative approval. TWU International President John Samuelsen emphasized the strong public support for maintaining two-person crews, stating, “The overwhelming majority of riders seek to keep Conductors on their trains and don’t want to see staffing reduced given that of automation. They don’t trust their safety and security to robots, to artificial intelligence, to technology.”
Rider Concerns and Union Polling Data
The TWU has bolstered its argument with polling data, claiming widespread rider support for maintaining two-person crews. A poll conducted by the Honan Strategy Group, commissioned by the union, surveyed 1,517 transit riders in New York City, North Jersey, and Long Island. According to the poll, 87% of respondents said they would support legislation mandating two-person subway crews, while 61% opposed a system-wide move to OPTO. The poll also indicated that a significant majority of riders – 86% – believe uniformed conductors deter crime, and 84% feel that two-member crews are better equipped to handle emergencies.
These findings align with anecdotal evidence and instances where conductors have played a critical role in assisting passengers. The MTA has previously acknowledged the contributions of conductors in providing assistance during train disruptions and emergencies. For example, the New York Daily News reported on a conductor lauded for providing a calming presence during an F train outage, and another story detailed how conductors and train operators collaborated to safely stop a train to prevent injuries to subway surfers.
Coalition Building and Modern Signaling Systems
The TWU has also been actively building a coalition of support for its position, partnering with advocacy groups such as Disabled in Action, the Brooklyn Center for the Independence of the Disabled, and the Riders Alliance. These organizations share concerns about the potential impact of reduced staffing on accessibility and safety for vulnerable riders. The coalition argues that conductors provide essential assistance to passengers with disabilities, elderly individuals, and those who may require facilitate navigating the subway system.
However, the MTA maintains that modern signaling systems, such as those currently installed on the No. 7 train, the L train, and portions of the E, M, F, and R lines along the Queens Boulevard line, are capable of controlling trains safely and efficiently with minimal human intervention. These Communication-Based Train Control (CBTC) systems leverage advanced technology to monitor train movements and prevent collisions, reducing the need for a conductor to manually operate the train. Proponents of OPTO argue that these systems are widely used in subways around the world and have a proven track record of safety and reliability. According to a report cited by transit advocates, modernizing train operations can align New York’s system with international standards.
Financial Implications and Workforce Costs
The financial implications of maintaining a two-person crew are significant. The MTA estimates that the roughly 3,600 conductors currently employed by the subway system cost the agency approximately $400 million annually in salaries and benefits. This cost is a major factor in the MTA’s push to expand OPTO, as reducing staffing levels could generate substantial savings. However, the TWU argues that the cost of maintaining a safe and reliable subway system should not be compromised by cutting corners on staffing.
The debate over OPTO is likely to intensify as the MTA and the TWU enter contract negotiations. The union is expected to make maintaining current staffing levels a central demand, while the MTA will likely seek to expand OPTO to reduce costs and improve efficiency. The outcome of these negotiations will have a significant impact on the future of the New York City subway system and the jobs of thousands of transit workers.
The next key step in this ongoing debate will be the introduction of the new legislation by TWU-backed lawmakers in Albany. The timing of this introduction is anticipated to coincide with the commencement of contract negotiations between the union and the MTA. The outcome of these negotiations, and the legislative response, will shape the future of subway staffing and safety protocols for years to arrive.
What are your thoughts on the future of the NYC subway system? Share your comments below and let us know what you think about the debate over two-person crews and the role of automation.