The intersection of faith, politics and personal conviction is rarely a straightforward one. As both the Christian season of Lent and the Islamic month of Ramadan unfold in 2026, a reflection on the role of “penitence” – not in a purely religious sense, but as a sustained, often arduous commitment to improving the world – has emerged in Italian political discourse. This contemplation, sparked by a personal exchange and articulated by Domenico Galbiati in an article for Politica Insieme, offers a compelling perspective on the enduring, and often underestimated, value of consistent effort in the face of seemingly insurmountable challenges.
Galbiati’s piece centers around a message received from a non-believing friend who extended greetings for a “good Lent” rather than “good Easter.” This distinction, the author explains, stems from a rejection of the concept of resurrection, but not of the inherent value of the Lenten period itself. The friend finds resonance in the “gray, leisurely, millimeter-by-millimeter, disarming daily effort” required to address the wounds and imperfections of the political landscape. This perspective, as illustrated by Galbiati, isn’t about seeking a miraculous transformation, but about the persistent, often unseen work of repair and restoration.
A ‘Penitential’ Path for Politics
The friend’s view, as relayed by Galbiati, draws a parallel to the biblical story of Veronica wiping the face of Christ on the Via Dolorosa. It suggests that politics, at its best, should embody a similar act of compassionate service – a willingness to confront difficult truths, to alleviate suffering, and to patiently rebuild trust. This isn’t a call for political self-flagellation, but rather a recognition that meaningful change rarely comes quickly or easily. It requires a sustained commitment to addressing the root causes of societal problems, even when the path forward is unclear.
Galbiati highlights that this friend’s faith isn’t in the salvation of the soul, but in the salvation of the world. And within that belief lies a conviction that politics plays a crucial role. He describes politics not as a rigid doctrine, but as a dynamic force where “the lines of force that traverse the field of life meet, intertwine and mutually fertilize.” This suggests a view of politics as a complex, interconnected system, capable of both immense good and profound harm, and requiring careful stewardship.
The author emphasizes the rarity of such a high-minded conception of politics – one that is simultaneously strong, naive, courageous, and hopeful. He finds solace in having a friend who, despite witnessing the pervasive violence and division in the world, continues to believe in the potential for positive change through political engagement. This perspective, Galbiati notes, surprisingly aligns with the philosophical views of Thomas Aquinas, who considered politics a fundamental aspect of human flourishing and the realization of individual dignity.
Aquinas and the Dignity of Political Engagement
Thomas Aquinas, the 13th-century Italian Dominican friar and philosopher, profoundly influenced Western thought. His work, Summa Theologica, extensively explores natural law, ethics, and political theory. Aquinas argued that political life is not merely a pragmatic necessity to maintain order, but a vital arena for the pursuit of the common good. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy details his belief that humans are naturally social beings, and that political communities are essential for enabling individuals to achieve their full potential. Aquinas believed that just laws, derived from natural law and divine law, are crucial for fostering a virtuous society.
Galbiati’s observation that a non-believer shares this perspective with Aquinas is particularly striking. It suggests that the value of political engagement transcends religious belief. The commitment to improving the world, to addressing injustice, and to upholding human dignity can be a shared ethical imperative, regardless of one’s spiritual convictions. This echoes the broader concept of secular humanism, which emphasizes reason, ethics, and justice as guiding principles for human action.
Ramadan and Lent: Shared Themes of Reflection and Renewal
The simultaneous observance of Ramadan and Lent in 2026 provides a unique opportunity for interfaith dialogue and mutual understanding. Both traditions emphasize themes of self-discipline, reflection, and compassion. During Ramadan, Muslims abstain from food and drink from dawn to dusk, focusing on prayer, charity, and spiritual renewal. Lent, for Christians, is a period of fasting, repentance, and preparation for Easter. A joint message from the Franciscan Order and Muslim leaders highlights this shared commitment to spiritual growth and social responsibility.
The idea of a “penitential” approach to politics, as described by Galbiati, resonates with the core values of both Ramadan and Lent. It suggests that true progress requires a willingness to confront our own shortcomings, to acknowledge the suffering of others, and to dedicate ourselves to the long-term work of building a more just and equitable world. This isn’t about seeking quick fixes or easy solutions, but about embracing the challenges with humility, perseverance, and a deep sense of moral purpose.
The Italian Political Landscape in Early 2026
As of March 9, 2026, Italy’s political climate remains dynamic. Giorgia Meloni continues to serve as Prime Minister, leading a center-right coalition. Recent articles from Politica Insieme demonstrate ongoing debate surrounding key policy issues, including climate change, economic stability, and international relations. Politica Insieme provides a platform for diverse perspectives on these challenges, reflecting the complexities of Italian politics. Discussions surrounding the influence of figures like Donald Trump and the dynamics within the European Union are prominent, indicating a continued focus on both domestic and international affairs.
The article by Galbiati, published on the same day as analyses of these current events, offers a valuable counterpoint to the often-cynical tone of political discourse. It reminds us that even in the face of seemingly intractable problems, there is still room for hope, for idealism, and for a steadfast commitment to the principles of justice and compassion. The call for a “penitential” approach to politics isn’t a call for resignation, but a call to action – a challenge to embrace the difficult work of building a better future, one small step at a time.
The ongoing war in Ukraine, as reflected in commentary on Politica Insieme, underscores the urgency of this message. The demand for peace, for dialogue, and for a rejection of violence is more pressing than ever. Galbiati’s piece suggests that true peace isn’t simply the absence of conflict, but the active cultivation of justice, reconciliation, and mutual respect.
As Italy, and the world, navigate these complex challenges, the perspective offered by Galbiati’s friend – a non-believer who finds meaning in the “penitential” work of politics – serves as a powerful reminder that the pursuit of a better future is a shared responsibility, one that transcends religious and ideological divides.
Looking ahead, the Italian political landscape will likely continue to evolve. The debates surrounding economic policy, climate change, and international relations will undoubtedly intensify. The ongoing discussions within Politica Insieme will continue to provide valuable insights into these critical issues. The need for thoughtful, engaged citizens – individuals committed to the principles of justice, compassion, and perseverance – will remain paramount.
What are your thoughts on the role of ethics in politics? Share your perspectives in the comments below, and don’t forget to share this article with your network.