Home / Health / Sixth Mass Extinction: Are We Sure It’s Happening?

Sixth Mass Extinction: Are We Sure It’s Happening?

Sixth Mass Extinction: Are We Sure It’s Happening?
Jake ​Buehler 2025-09-04 18:00:00

We may not be living through Earth’s​ sixth ‌mass extinction event ­­— ⁤at​ least not yet.

That’s the conclusion of⁤ a new analysis⁤ of plant ​and animal extinctions published September 4 in PLOS Biology. The ‍researchers propose⁢ that human-driven extinctions​ of genera ​in recent centuries have been⁤ rare.

But not ‍everyone agrees with that assessment. The study is more about ⁢semantics, says Gerardo Ceballos,‍ an ecologist who coauthored a 2023 study arguing that earth is in⁣ the midst of a ⁤mass extinction. “The people who define a mass extinction are the​ ones who are studying it,” says Ceballos, of the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico City.

Also Read:  Honey Health: $7.8M Seed Funding for AI-Powered Healthcare Automation

The five known mass extinctions in Earth’s history — such as the ⁤one that extinguished nonavian dinosaurs about 66 million years ago — where characterized by abrupt losses of biodiversity,⁤ with‌ at least 75 percent of species vanishing, says evolutionary ⁢ecologist John Wiens of the University of Arizona in Tucson. Higher taxonomic levels, ⁤such as genera and families, frequently enough disappear too, representing a more profound loss of evolutionary⁣ history during these ‍cataclysms.

The existence and character of a sixth, human-caused mass extinction has been debated for many ‌years.⁣ The 2023⁢ study argued that genera of ⁤tetrapods ⁣— limbed vertebrates and their‍ descendants — ‍were rapidly disappearing ‌as part of just such an event.

Wiens and‌ evolutionary ecologist kristen Saban of Harvard ‍University estimated ‍that ⁤tetrapods ⁣represent​ only 2 percent of all species, so the duo did their own analysis. Diving into the International Union for the⁣ Conservation of Nature’s database, they compiled information on⁣ over 163,000 plant and⁣ animal‍ species across more than 22,000⁣ genera ⁣and compared extinctions by taxonomic group, geographic location and timing.

The ⁤team ​found that less than 2 percent⁤ of mammal genera whent​ extinct in the last⁤ 500 years,‍ and under 0.5 percent ‌of genera had ⁤vanished across all ⁤groups. “It’s nowhere close to 75 percent” ⁢of ⁢species, ⁤Wiens says.

Looking more closely at where these losses‍ occurred,they found that over half ⁢of the 102 extinctions ‌of genera‍ involved mammals or birds,and about three-quarters were ​organisms restricted to islands.The extinction⁤ rate is also declining, having⁤ peaked at the ⁢turn of the 20th century. Most extinctions seem to have occurred in a‍ relatively recent pulse when humans arrived on‍ islands and took a heavy ⁤toll on sensitive local species.

“These past extinctions are ​kind of weird, and we ‌don’t think they’re a road map to⁢ future extinctions,” Wiens ⁢says.

Also Read:  WA Health Projects: Meekatharra Hospital & Albany Health Campus Proposals Open

For Ceballos and Paul Ehrlich — the ​ecologists who conducted the ⁤2023 study —‍ the new paper misses⁤ the bigger ⁣picture. ‍Dramatic population declines such as those reported among insects, they argue, are more meaningful than whether the last individual ​is ‍alive or not.

“We’re losing our ability ​to sustain civilization,” says ‍Ehrlich, of Stanford ‌University. ⁣“Fooling around with counts of how many species might ​or might ‍not go ⁢extinct‍ as ‍species doesn’t mean ‌a damn‌ thing if you’re losing⁣ all‍ the insects ‌except‍ a small population of each one.”

Population ecologist Leah Gerber, who was not involved‌ with either study, argues that getting these⁣ kinds of specifics ‌right is ‌crucial.“We⁤ must be precise⁣ about what we measure and communicate. Overstating the evidence‍ risks undermining credibility,” says gerber, of Arizona State‍ University in Tempe. “Humanity is still causing profound biodiversity change, but not ‍every⁣ metric ​points to ‘mass⁢ extinction.’”

Wiens agrees, stressing the importance of scientific credibility.⁢ “You don’t want to be ‌the boy ​who‍ cried wolf,” he says. The goal, he adds,⁢ shouldn’t be⁢ avoiding a mass extinction anyways, ‌which is ​a low bar. “It’s weak and unambitious … We⁣ prefer there to be zero percent extinction.”

And, ⁢semantics aside, there is a real and mounting risk for biodiversity, he ⁤adds. The current ⁣situation is a bit ⁢like peering over ⁢the edge of a cliff.

“Sadly, it’s still‍ likely that in the next ⁢100 years, we could lose 30 or 40 percent of all species on Earth to climate change,” he⁤ says, noting such a ⁣loss would be devastating. “But it​ still needs to ​be twice that much to‍ be a mass ⁣extinction event.”

Leave a Reply