Researchers at the University of Minnesota have developed SpudCell, the world’s first synthetic cell with a complete life cycle, built entirely from non-living chemical components. According to a statement from the project team, the cell can feed, grow, replicate its genome, divide, and undergo selection, demonstrating that fundamental biological functions can be replicated through chemistry without a natural biological starting point.
The project, led by Professor Kate Adamala, represents a “bottom-up” approach to synthetic biology. While traditional efforts often involve stripping genetic material from existing living cells to find the minimum requirements for life, Adamala’s team gradually assembled genetic material and chemical components by hand until the system exhibited cellular behavior.
Professor Adamala stated that the project proves the most fundamental functions of life do not require a "mysterious magical spark."
Engineering the SpudCell Genome and Structure
SpudCell is significantly simpler than any naturally occurring cell. For comparison, the human genome contains approximately 3 million kilobase pairs (kbp), whereas SpudCell possesses 90. Rather than a single chromosome, the SpudCell genome is distributed across seven separate DNA plasmids, a design that allows researchers to program specific cellular functions independently.

Despite its ability to mimic life, the cell remains dependent on external biological components. SpudCell does not produce its own ribosomes, instead utilizing those from E. coli bacteria. Because of this limitation, the cell can only replicate for five to 10 generations before the system degrades. Additionally, the cell requires the regular addition of nutrient-carrying liposomes to sustain its feeding process.
Drew Endy, a synthetic biologist at Stanford University, described the achievement as a cell that was “built, not born,” noting that while it is constructed, it performs the essential actions of a cell.
Scientific Impact and the Definition of Life
The creation of SpudCell has prompted a debate over whether the synthetic entity qualifies as “alive.” Professor Adamala has expressed hesitation in using the term, noting that “life is not binary” and that there is no clear line between the living and the inert.
Other experts in the field view the project as a major milestone. John Glass, who leads synthetic cell research at the J. Craig Venter Institute, stated that the team built a nonliving synthetic cell that is closer to being “alive” than any other product in the bottom-up synthetic cell field. Similarly, Roseanna Zia, a computational cell biologist at the University of Missouri, described the work as a “stunning scientific achievement.”
Professor Tom Ellis of Imperial College London told The Guardian that the project is likely the field’s “biggest breakthrough in recent times.” Ellis noted that synthetic cells help scientists understand the minimum requirements for life and how life may have emerged from chemistry, while providing a controlled system for testing biological circuits and computer models.
The Path to Biotic and Future Applications
To scale this research, Professor Adamala, Professor Endy, and two other researchers have established Biotic, a public-benefit nonprofit research organization. Biotic aims to create a shared technical infrastructure for synthetic cell engineering, positioning SpudCell as a “chassis” that other scientists can use to apply the technology to complex challenges.

The University of Minnesota announcement suggests several potential applications for cells built from scratch, including:
- Molecular Medicine: Creating precise therapeutic molecules and drugs using amino acids that did not evolve naturally.
- Advanced Materials: Growing materials rather than synthesizing them through traditional chemistry.
- Sustainable Manufacturing: Developing industrial processes that operate at biological temperatures rather than high industrial heat.
Professor Adamala likens the current state of SpudCell to the Wright brothers’ first airplane—a basic proof of concept that serves as the foundation for future, more complex iterations. Dr. David A. Relman, a microbiologist at Stanford University, told K.R. Callaway of NYT that the work is “creative, disruptive and provocative” in terms of what may be possible in the near future.
The Biotic organization has begun providing detailed protocols on its website to allow other researchers to build SpudCells within a “sandbox environment” to further the goal of making biology a general-purpose technology.
The research team continues to refine the SpudCell chassis to increase its robustness and practical utility.