Steven Spielberg has provided a definitive answer to a recurring viral debate regarding the physical texture of the titular character in his 1982 film, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. During a recent appearance on The New York Times podcast The Daily, the director clarified that the character was “a little moist but never slimy,” distinguishing the creature’s design from more traditionally grotesque cinematic aliens.
The clarification addresses long-standing discussions among film enthusiasts and internet communities regarding whether the beloved extraterrestrial would have felt slimy or dry to the touch. Spielberg, who directed the landmark science fiction film, characterized the debate as “wild” before offering his perspective on the intended tactile nature of the character’s skin.
According to Spielberg, the character’s appearance was designed to maintain a level of approachability and warmth, a key component of the film’s emotional resonance. He noted that while the character possessed a degree of moisture, it was a specific distinction from the “slimy” textures often found in the science fiction genre. He further added that the character was “only dry when he got sick,” linking the physical state of the creature to its narrative health arc.
Comparing E.T. to Iconic Cinematic Creatures
To illustrate the difference between his character design and more visceral creature effects, Spielberg drew a comparison to the xenomorph featured in Ridley Scott’s 1979 film, Alien. The xenomorph is widely recognized for its glistening, viscous, and overtly slimy appearance, which contributed to the film’s horror elements.
“That’s slimy!” Spielberg stated during the interview, referencing the xenomorph. He explained that the production of E.T. deliberately avoided such textures, noting, “E.T. never had the tendrils of drool. We didn’t go that far.” This distinction highlights the different creative directions taken by filmmakers when using practical effects to evoke either empathy or terror.
The design of E.T. was central to the film’s ability to connect with audiences. By avoiding excessive slime or aggressive biological features, the production team, including effects artists, helped establish the character as a sympathetic figure rather than a traditional monster. This approach was instrumental in the film’s massive success, as it allowed the audience to see the alien through the eyes of the protagonist, Elliott.
The Legacy and Commercial Impact of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial
Released in 1982, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial became a cultural phenomenon and one of the most significant commercial successes in cinematic history. The film’s performance at the global box office set new standards for the science fiction genre, proving that character-driven stories could achieve massive scale.
For 11 years, E.T. held the record as the highest-grossing film of all time. It was eventually surpassed by Spielberg’s own 1993 blockbuster, Jurassic Park. The enduring popularity of the film is evidenced by its continued presence in pop culture discussions and the lasting impact of its practical creature effects, which preceded the widespread adoption of computer-generated imagery (CGI).
Key Facts About E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial
- Original Release Year: 1982
- Director: Steven Spielberg
- Lead Actor: Henry Thomas (as Elliott)
- Box Office Milestone: Highest-grossing film of all time from 1982 to 1993.
- Successor: Surpassed by Jurassic Park in 1993.
Potential for a Sequel and the ‘Green Planet’ Connection
While the debate over E.T.’s texture remains a popular topic, Spielberg has addressed the possibility of expanding the franchise. Last year, the director revealed that he had considered the idea of producing a sequel set in space, which would have taken the audience to the character’s home planet.
This concept was inspired by The Green Planet, a novelization of the E.T. story written by William Kotzwinkle. However, Spielberg ultimately decided against pursuing a cinematic adaptation of the expanded lore. He concluded that the concept of a space-based sequel “was better as a novel than it would have been as a film,” suggesting that the intimate, Earth-bound nature of the original story was its greatest strength.
This decision reflects Spielberg’s long-standing approach to storytelling, often prioritizing the emotional core of a narrative over the expansion of a franchise through high-concept science fiction settings. By keeping the story grounded in the relationship between a child and an alien, the film maintained a level of relatability that has allowed it to remain relevant decades after its release.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding E.T.
Was E.T. designed to be a scary character?
No. While the character had unique biological features, the design was intentionally crafted to be non-threatening and sympathetic to facilitate an emotional connection with the audience.
Why did Steven Spielberg mention the movie Alien?
Spielberg used the xenomorph from Alien as a contrast to E.T. to explain that while some creatures are designed to be overtly slimy and unsettling, E.T. was designed to be “moist” but not “slimy.”
Is there an official E.T. sequel in development?
As of current official statements, there are no active plans for an E.T. sequel. Spielberg has previously stated that he believes the story is best left as it is.
As the film industry continues to evolve with new technologies, the discussion surrounding the practical effects and character designs of the 1980s remains a vital part of film history. We will continue to monitor official industry updates regarding any new projects from the director.
What are your thoughts on the design of classic sci-fi creatures? Share your views in the comments below and share this article with your fellow film enthusiasts.
Keep reading