Sweden’s New immigration Law Forces Out Integrated Workers,Sparking Internal Debate
A recent change in Swedish immigration law is causing significant disruption,forcing individuals who have built lives and careers in Sweden to face deportation. the abolition of the “track change” (spårbyte) law, which came into effect in April, is now impacting employed and well-integrated immigrants, igniting a political backlash within the governing Moderate Party itself. This article delves into the details of the law,the resulting consequences,and the growing calls for reconsideration.
What Was the “Track Change” law?
Previously, the spårbyte law allowed asylum seekers whose applications were rejected to apply for a work permit without leaving Sweden.this provided a pathway for individuals to contribute to the Swedish economy and society,even after initial asylum claims failed. However, in the spring, Sweden’s parliament voted to abolish this provision, fundamentally altering the landscape for many.
The Human Cost of the New Law
The immediate impact of the law change is becoming increasingly clear. Reports are surfacing of immigrants being forced to leave, despite holding down jobs in critical sectors. One particularly poignant case involves Sara Ghorbani Shamasbi, her husband Farhood Masoudi, and their son Parhan, residents of Norsjö, Västerbotten.
* Shamasbi has a permanent position with a cleaning company.
* Masoudi is employed in elderly care, a field facing severe staffing shortages.
Despite their contributions, the family is facing deportation. This situation highlights a growing concern: the law is removing individuals from sectors desperately needing skilled workers.
Growing Internal Opposition
The situation has sparked criticism from within the Moderate party, the driving force behind the law’s abolition. Håkan Jansson, a Moderate Party representative on the Norsjö municipal council, publicly voiced his concerns. He acknowledged the party’s obligation, stating, “We moderates pushed the button – we abolished the track change law – and I have to take responsibility for that.” Jansson further admitted the decision wasn’t ”well thoght out.”
Douglas Thor, chair of Moderata ungdomsförbundet (MUF), the youth wing of the Moderate Party, echoed this sentiment.”I think that people who have made an effort and have done everything we asked of them also deserve to be able to stay,” he stated.
The Scale of the Problem
The Swedish Migration Agency estimates that approximately 2,600 people are now at risk of deportation due to the law’s removal. This represents a significant number of individuals who have integrated into Swedish society and contribute to the workforce.
Government Stance and Proposed Solutions
Migration Minister Johan Forssell remains steadfast in his opposition to revisiting the decision. He suggests that those affected can apply for new work permits from their home countries, provided they meet the newly increased salary thresholds. However,this solution is facing strong criticism.
Thor argues this approach is impractical and unfair. “It’s a bit like someone getting a building permit and who has already started building and who is then made to demolish everything they’ve built and then build it back up just to make the bureaucracy work properly,” he explained. Essentially, it forces individuals to restart their careers from scratch, abandoning the progress they’ve already made.
What does This Mean for You?
If you are an immigrant in Sweden affected by this change, understanding your options is crucial. While the situation is challenging, staying informed about potential legal avenues and advocating for your rights is essential.
This situation underscores the complexities of immigration policy and the importance of considering the human impact of legislative changes. The debate surrounding the spårbyte law is far from over, and its outcome will undoubtedly shape Sweden’s immigration landscape for years to come.
Sources:
* Aftonbladet Report on Norsjö Case
