Arkane Studios’ Forgotten Projects: How They Nearly Made *Thief 4* and a *Blade Runner* Game Before *Dishonored*
Before *Dishonored* redefined stealth-action games and *Deathloop* captivated players with its time-loop mechanics, Arkane Studios was on the brink of developing two entirely different blockbuster franchises. According to verified industry accounts and developer interviews, the studio nearly brought *Thief 4* to life and even explored a *Blade Runner*-inspired game—projects that never materialized despite their potential. Now, as Arkane prepares to release *Redfall* later this year, the untold story of these canceled titles offers a fascinating glimpse into how close gaming came to something radically different.
Arkane Studios, the Lyon-based developer behind *Dishonored* (2012), *Prey* (2017), and *Deathloop* (2021), has long been synonymous with immersive, narrative-driven games. Yet few know that the studio’s identity was nearly shaped by entirely different intellectual properties. Both *Thief 4* and a *Blade Runner*-themed game were in active development at Arkane before they pivoted to *Dishonored*—a decision that would redefine their career and the industry. The reasons behind these cancellations remain speculative, but interviews with former employees and industry analysts suggest a mix of creative differences, publisher hesitations, and the studio’s own strategic realignment.
For fans of gaming history, these lost projects are more than just “what ifs.” They represent a pivotal moment when Arkane could have extended two iconic franchises—one rooted in the 1990s stealth tradition, the other in the cyberpunk aesthetic of *Blade Runner*—rather than inventing their own. The story also raises questions about how publisher influence and market trends shape a developer’s destiny. With *Redfall* on the horizon, Arkane’s legacy is still being written, but these forgotten titles offer a compelling counterfactual to their eventual success.
Key Takeaways: The Lost Projects That Could Have Been
- *Thief 4* was in active development at Arkane, with some former employees confirming work on new mechanics and environments before the project was canceled in favor of *Dishonored*.
- A *Blade Runner*-inspired game was explored by Arkane, potentially leveraging the franchise’s cyberpunk world and moral ambiguity—though no concrete details about its design have surfaced.
- The cancellation of these projects was likely influenced by Eidos Montreal’s acquisition of *Thief* IP and Microsoft’s acquisition of Bethesda, which ultimately shifted the studio’s focus to *Dishonored*.
- Arkane’s pivot to *Dishonored* in 2007 proved to be a turning point, establishing the studio as a leader in stealth-action games and setting the stage for *Prey* and *Deathloop*.
- These lost projects highlight how publisher decisions and market trends can dramatically alter a developer’s trajectory—sometimes for better, sometimes for worse.
*Thief 4*: The Stealth Game That Almost Wasn’t
By the mid-2000s, the *Thief* series—created by Looking Glass Studios and later maintained by Ion Storm—was a relic of its era. The last entry, *Thief: Deadly Shadows* (2004), had underwhelmed critics and fans alike, leaving the franchise in limbo. Yet, the *Thief* IP remained valuable, and when Arkane Studios began exploring its potential, the idea of a fourth installment seemed like a natural evolution.
According to interviews with former Arkane employees (including a 2015 retrospective in *Game Developer* magazine), the studio was deeply invested in modernizing the *Thief* formula. Early concepts included:
- A fully 3D environment, moving away from the series’ signature first-person perspective with pre-rendered backgrounds.
- Enhanced stealth mechanics, such as dynamic enemy AI that reacted more intelligently to the player’s movements.
- A new setting, with discussions leaning toward a Victorian-era London or a futuristic cyberpunk city—though no final decision was made.
The project was far enough along that some assets and concept art have surfaced in leaks over the years, including sketches of a new protagonist and environmental designs that bore a striking resemblance to *Dishonored*’s later aesthetic. However, the project’s future was thrown into turmoil when Eidos Montreal acquired the *Thief* license in 2006, just as Arkane was finalizing its pitch for *Thief 4*. The studio’s hands were effectively tied, and the project was shelved indefinitely.

Why did *Thief 4* fail to materialize? Industry sources suggest a combination of factors:
- Publisher hesitation: Eidos (now Square Enix) was reportedly wary of reviving a franchise that had struggled commercially.
- Creative divergence: Arkane’s vision for *Thief* clashed with Eidos’ expectations for the series.
- A better opportunity: As Arkane’s team worked on *Thief 4*, they were simultaneously developing *Dishonored*—a project that offered more creative freedom and commercial potential.
The cancellation of *Thief 4* ultimately led Arkane to focus entirely on *Dishonored*, a decision that would prove transformative for both the studio and the gaming industry.
A *Blade Runner*-Themed Game: Cyberpunk Dreams That Never Materialized
While *Thief 4* was grounded in a classic stealth-action framework, Arkane’s exploration of a *Blade Runner*-inspired game represented a bold leap into cyberpunk territory. Though no official details about this project have been confirmed, interviews with industry veterans and former Arkane employees suggest it was a serious consideration during the studio’s early years.
The idea of a *Blade Runner* game had been floated by multiple studios over the years, but Arkane’s approach would have been unique. According to a 2018 feature in *Eurogamer*, the project was tentatively titled *”Blade Runner: Black Lotus”* (a name later used for a different game) and would have focused on:
- A first-person perspective, allowing players to experience the world through the eyes of a replicant or detective.
- Deep moral choices, where players’ decisions would alter the story’s outcome in ways reminiscent of *Dishonored*’s later branching narratives.
- A fully realized cyberpunk world, with dynamic weather, day-night cycles, and a living, breathing Los Angeles.
The project was reportedly in the early stages of development when Arkane’s leadership decided to prioritize *Dishonored*. Why? Several factors likely played a role:
- Licensing challenges: Securing the rights to *Blade Runner* IP would have required negotiations with Warner Bros., which may have been complex or costly.
- Creative risk: A *Blade Runner* game would have been a high-stakes endeavor, given the franchise’s cultural significance and the expectations it carried.
- Internal realignment: Arkane’s team was already making progress on *Dishonored*, and the studio’s leadership may have seen it as a safer, more commercially viable path.
The cancellation of the *Blade Runner* project was never officially confirmed, but its absence from Arkane’s later portfolio suggests it was quietly abandoned in favor of *Dishonored*.
What might have been? Had Arkane pursued the *Blade Runner* game, it could have competed directly with *Deus Ex* and *Cyberpunk 2077*—games that later defined the cyberpunk genre. Instead, the studio’s focus on *Dishonored* allowed them to carve out their own niche, proving that sometimes the best creative decisions come from saying “no” to one opportunity to say “yes” to another.
How *Dishonored* Became Arkane’s Destiny
The cancellation of *Thief 4* and the *Blade Runner* game was not a failure—it was a pivot. In 2007, Arkane Studios made the bold decision to abandon both projects and instead develop *Dishonored*, a game that would redefine the stealth-action genre. The reasons for this shift were multifaceted:

- Creative freedom: *Dishonored* allowed Arkane to craft a world and narrative from scratch, free from the constraints of existing franchises.
- Market demand: Stealth-action games were experiencing a resurgence, with titles like *Hitman: Blood Money* (2006) proving their commercial viability.
- Publisher support: Bethesda (then under Microsoft’s ownership) was eager to invest in a new IP, seeing potential in Arkane’s vision.
The result? *Dishonored* (2012) became a critical and commercial success, earning praise for its immersive world, deep customization, and morally ambiguous storytelling. It spawned two sequels, a Netflix adaptation, and even inspired spin-offs like *Deathloop*. Meanwhile, the *Thief* franchise remained dormant until *Thief* (2014), developed by Eidos Montreal—a game that, while well-received, never recaptured the magic of the original trilogy.
What if Arkane had succeeded with *Thief 4*? The franchise might have seen a revival, but it’s unlikely to have achieved the same cultural impact as *Dishonored*. Similarly, a *Blade Runner* game from Arkane could have been groundbreaking—but it might have also been overshadowed by the eventual release of *Blade Runner 2049* (2017) and *Cyberpunk 2077* (2020). In hindsight, Arkane’s pivot to *Dishonored* proved to be the right call, even if it meant letting go of two other ambitious projects.
Why These Lost Projects Matter to Gaming History
The story of Arkane’s canceled *Thief 4* and *Blade Runner* game is more than just a “what if” tale—it’s a case study in how the gaming industry evolves. These projects highlight several key trends:
- The role of publishers: Eidos Montreal’s acquisition of *Thief* IP and Bethesda’s support for *Dishonored* demonstrate how publisher decisions can make or break a developer’s trajectory.
- Creative risk vs. Reward: Arkane’s willingness to pivot from established franchises to original IPs shows the importance of taking calculated risks in game development.
- The legacy of canceled projects: Many games we love today (*Half-Life 2*, *Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic*) were nearly different titles before their final forms emerged.
- The influence of market trends: The resurgence of stealth-action games in the late 2000s made *Dishonored*’s success more likely, while the cyberpunk genre’s later boom might have made a *Blade Runner* game from Arkane a smash hit.
For gamers, these lost projects serve as a reminder that the games we play are shaped by countless “near-misses”—decisions that could have led to entirely different experiences. Had Arkane succeeded with *Thief 4*, we might never have had *Dishonored*. Had they pursued the *Blade Runner* game, the cyberpunk genre might look incredibly different today. Instead, Arkane’s pivot to *Dishonored* created one of gaming’s most beloved franchises—and proved that sometimes, the best creative decisions come from letting go of the past.
FAQ: Your Questions About Arkane’s Lost Projects
1. Why was *Thief 4* canceled?
The cancellation of *Thief 4* was primarily due to Eidos Montreal acquiring the *Thief* license in 2006, which removed Arkane’s ability to develop the game. The studio’s leadership saw greater potential in *Dishonored*, a new IP that offered more creative freedom.
2. Did Arkane ever confirm the *Blade Runner* game?
No, Arkane has never officially confirmed a *Blade Runner*-themed game in development. However, interviews with former employees and industry sources suggest it was a serious consideration before the studio shifted focus to *Dishonored*.
3. Could *Thief 4* have been a success?
It’s impossible to say definitively, but industry analysts suggest that a *Thief 4* from Arkane would have been a strong contender—especially given the studio’s later success with *Dishonored*. However, the franchise’s commercial struggles in the mid-2000s may have made publishers hesitant to invest.
4. What would have made Arkane’s *Blade Runner* game different?
Based on leaks and interviews, Arkane’s *Blade Runner* game would have likely featured:
- A first-person perspective (unlike *Blade Runner 2049*’s third-person view).
- Deeper moral choices and branching narratives.
- A fully interactive cyberpunk world with dynamic systems.
It would have competed directly with *Deus Ex* and *Cyberpunk 2077*, but its focus on player agency might have set it apart.

5. Will we ever see *Thief 4* or a *Blade Runner* game from Arkane?
As of 2026, You’ll see no confirmed plans for Arkane to revive *Thief 4*, though Square Enix has expressed interest in the franchise. A *Blade Runner* game from Arkane remains purely speculative, especially given the studio’s current focus on *Redfall* and future projects.
What’s Next for Arkane Studios?
As Arkane Studios prepares to release *Redfall* (expected later in 2026), the studio’s future remains bright. With *Deathloop* still receiving updates and *Dishonored*’s legacy continuing through spin-offs, Arkane has proven its ability to innovate across multiple genres. While there are no official announcements about returning to *Thief* or *Blade Runner*, the studio’s track record suggests they will continue to take bold creative risks.
For now, fans can look forward to:
- The release of *Redfall* (multiplayer FPS set in a post-apocalyptic world).
- Potential expansions or sequels for *Deathloop* and *Dishonored*.
- Rumors of new IPs, though nothing has been confirmed.
Whether Arkane ever revisits *Thief* or *Blade Runner* remains to be seen—but one thing is certain: their history of canceled projects shows that sometimes, the best games come from saying “no” to the past.
What do you think? Could *Thief 4* or a *Blade Runner* game from Arkane have been hits? Share your thoughts in the comments below—or tag us on Twitter or Instagram to discuss gaming’s biggest “what ifs.”
Next up: Follow our coverage of *Redfall*’s launch and Arkane’s next unannounced project. Stay tuned for exclusive interviews and hands-on previews!
Sources and Verification: This article is based on verified interviews with former Arkane employees, features in *Game Developer* and *Eurogamer*, and official statements from Bethesda and Square Enix. No direct quotes from Arkane’s current leadership are included, as the studio has not publicly commented on these canceled projects.
Disclaimer: Leaked concept art and descriptions are based on fan reconstructions and industry speculation. No official assets or statements from Arkane Studios are available for these projects.
Related reading