The pursuit of academic and professional advancement often involves navigating complex evaluation systems. In Italy, a key component of this process for those aspiring to become university professors is the *Abilitazione Scientifica Nazionale* (ASN), or National Scientific Qualification. Recent updates and ongoing assessments, including those utilizing tools like IRIS, are designed to ensure a rigorous and transparent evaluation of research quality. Understanding the nuances of this system is crucial for researchers seeking to progress in their careers.
The ASN is not merely a formality; it’s a prerequisite for participating in competitions for professorships at Italian universities. Established by Italian Law 240 of 2010, the qualification process is a non-comparative evaluation managed by the Ministry of University and Research (MUR) through national evaluation committees, each dedicated to a specific academic sector. As detailed by the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, the current ASN cycle, 2023-2025, has seen application deadlines pass in phases throughout 2023 and 2024, with the final quadrimester of the session concluding by April 30, 2025.
Understanding the ASN Evaluation Process
The evaluation process hinges on a comprehensive assessment of a candidate’s scientific output. This is where tools like IRIS – an Italian academic information system – become vital. IRIS collects and analyzes data related to research publications, citations, and other indicators of scholarly impact. The system then simulates how a researcher’s production aligns with the thresholds established for the ASN. Still, it’s important to note, as highlighted in documentation related to IRIS, that this simulation is not a guarantee of qualification. The simulation is based on bibliometric indicators as of a specific date and doesn’t account for periods of mandatory leave, which can grant percentage increases to the required values.
The Scuola Normale Superiore emphasizes the importance of efficient management of research products to support these assessment activities. Their research assessment page details the broader context of research evaluation in Italy, which aims to guide the Ministry of Universities and Research (MUR) in making informed investment decisions within the higher education sector. The Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (ANVUR), or National Agency for the Assessment of Universities and Research, plays a central role in defining the criteria and parameters for both research quality assessment (VQR) and the ASN.
Key Indicators and Thresholds
The ASN evaluation isn’t based on a single metric. Candidates are assessed against a range of indicators, including publication quality, impact, and efficiency. The MUR establishes specific criteria, parameters, and threshold values for these indicators, as outlined in the “Criteria and Parameters” Regulation. While the exact thresholds vary depending on the specific academic sector (SC/SSD), candidates generally need to meet at least two out of three key indicators to be considered for qualification. The IRIS system provides a simulation to help researchers understand where they stand in relation to these thresholds, but it’s crucial to remember that this is only an indicative assessment.
The process similarly requires researchers to create an ORCID profile, a unique digital identifier for researchers, as recommended by the Scuola Normale Superiore. This helps ensure accurate tracking of research output and facilitates the evaluation process. The ASN is closely linked to the *Valutazione della Ricerca* (VQR), the national research quality assessment, which provides further data for evaluating the impact and quality of Italian research institutions.
The Role of IRIS in the Evaluation
IRIS serves as a crucial tool for both researchers and evaluation committees. It aggregates data from various sources, providing a centralized platform for assessing scientific production. The system utilizes algorithms and publicly available data to calculate indicators relevant to the ASN. However, it’s essential to acknowledge the limitations of the system. The simulation generated by IRIS can differ from the actual outcome of an ASN application due to potential errors in cataloging, missing data, or variations in bibliometric data over time. ANVUR calculates the indicator values based on the latest available data at the time of application submission.
The University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, coordinating the Focus Group IRIS, has emphasized that the simulation is intended as a tool to aid in manual calculations or the leverage of equivalent instruments. Cineca, the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, and the IRIS Focus Group explicitly state they assume no responsibility for how individuals or third parties utilize the simulation results. This underscores the importance of researchers independently verifying their data and understanding the nuances of the evaluation process.
Recent Updates and the 2023-2025 Cycle
The current ASN cycle (2023-2025) is considered a transitional phase, pending the adoption of a ministerial decree that will introduce new Scientific-Disciplinary Groups (GSD). This means the committees established for this cycle will have a duration of eighteen months. The call for applications for commissioners expired in September 2023, and the focus now shifts to the evaluation of submitted applications. The procedures for obtaining the qualification are initiated every two years, allowing candidates to submit applications throughout the year.
The ASN process is governed by a complex set of regulations and criteria. Researchers are advised to carefully review the official guidelines and seek clarification from relevant authorities if needed. The process requires meticulous attention to detail and a thorough understanding of the evaluation criteria. Successfully navigating the ASN is a significant step towards a career as a university professor in Italy, but it requires diligent preparation and a commitment to high-quality research.
Looking Ahead: The Future of Research Evaluation in Italy
The Italian system of research evaluation is constantly evolving. The introduction of new Scientific-Disciplinary Groups (GSD) promises to refine the evaluation process and better reflect the changing landscape of academic disciplines. The continued development of tools like IRIS will also play a crucial role in streamlining the evaluation process and ensuring transparency. However, the fundamental principles of rigorous assessment and a commitment to research quality will remain central to the ASN and the broader Italian academic system.
The next key checkpoint for researchers is the completion of the ASN 2023-2025 evaluation process and the subsequent announcement of results. Staying informed about updates from the MUR and ANVUR is essential for those planning to pursue professorships in Italy. We encourage readers to share their experiences and insights in the comments below and to share this article with colleagues navigating the ASN process.
Worth a look