The long Shadow of Executive Power: From Cheney to Trump and the Erosion of Constitutional Checks and Balances
The presidency of Donald Trump has been marked by repeated clashes with established norms of governance and outright abuses of power. While often framed as uniquely Trumpian, a closer examination reveals a disturbing continuity with the expansion of executive authority championed by figures like Dick Cheney and a lineage of “normal” Republicans stretching back decades. This isn’t simply a case of one politician’s excesses; it’s the logical, if alarming, culmination of a decades-long trend towards concentrating power in the executive branch, a trend that now threatens the very foundations of American democracy.
For years, concerns about presidential overreach where largely confined to academic and legal circles. Now, they are playing out in real-time, with Trump actively dismantling safeguards designed to limit executive power.His management’s disregard for Congressional appropriations – refusing to spend funds allocated for vital programs like the National Institutes of Health,FEMA,and Head Start – is a direct affront to the Impoundment Control Act. Similarly, the closure of USAID via executive order bypasses Congressional authorization, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the legislative branch’s constitutional role in shaping foreign policy. These actions aren’t isolated incidents; they are echoes of a philosophy that Cheney, and those before him, actively cultivated.
Cheney, notably, opposed the Impoundment Control Act, foreshadowing a willingness to prioritize executive prerogative over Congressional authority. This pattern continues with Trump’s disregard for the war Powers Act,evidenced by the authorization of military actions against suspected drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific without Congressional approval.While the administration offers justifications,they ring hollow to anyone familiar with the Act’s intent: to prevent unilateral presidential war-making. Cheney consistently argued against the war Powers Act, deeming it an unconstitutional infringement on presidential authority – a position that now underpins Trump’s actions.
The core of this escalating trend lies in the “unitary executive theory,” a doctrine Cheney ardently promoted. This theory posits that the President possesses virtually unlimited authority over the executive branch, free from meaningful internal checks. Trump is leveraging this theory to attempt the firing of officials at independent agencies like the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Reserve,and to pressure the Justice Department into targeting his political opponents. Cheney’s advocacy for expansive “executive privilege” – intended to protect national security decision-making - pales in comparison to Trump’s attempts to eliminate all internal checks on presidential power. Today, the courts stand as the last bulwark against the complete erosion of constitutional order.
(Image Suggestion: A split image. One side showing a portrait of Dick Cheney,the other of Donald Trump,with a subtle visual portrayal of eroding pillars or a crumbling foundation between them.)
It’s crucial to avoid the simplistic narrative of Trump as a complete outlier. While he has undoubtedly taken things further, and in different directions, his actions are rooted in a legacy of expanding executive power. Trump’s repudiation of free trade and legal immigration, and his attempts to suppress dissent, are distinct from Cheney’s worldview. Cheney, despite his own controversial tactics during the “War on Terror,” wasn’t fundamentally opposed to democracy. His deployment of the National Guard during the 1992 Los Angeles riots was a response to a legitimate emergency, requested by the state’s governor – a far cry from Trump’s threats to deploy federal forces against Democrat-run cities. Cheney was a pragmatist, a technocrat, motivated by duty rather than self-aggrandizement.
However, the historical trajectory is undeniable: each generation of Republicans has moved further to the right. Ronald reagan surpassed Richard Nixon in ideological conservatism, and Trump has surpassed Reagan. Barry Goldwater, once considered the far-right standard-bearer, eventually became a critic of the party’s social conservatism. Similarly, Cheney, a champion of the hard right in his time, ultimately became a symbol of resistance to the MAGA movement. This demonstrates a consistent pattern of radicalization, where the boundaries of acceptable conservative ideology are continually pushed.
The Need for a Conservative Reckoning
The time has come for principled conservatives to critically re-evaluate the legacy of figures like Cheney and their unwavering commitment to untrammeled executive authority. The consequences of this devotion are now painfully clear. instead of seeking further expansion of presidential power, constitutional conservatives must prioritize the restoration of checks and balances that are being systematically dismantled by the trump administration.
This requires a fundamental shift in perspective. It demands a renewed commitment to Congressional oversight,a robust defense of independent agencies,and a willingness to challenge executive overreach,even when it comes from a president aligned with their own political ideology. The preservation of American democracy depends not on simply opposing Trump, but on dismantling the structural foundations that enabled his abuses of power – foundations that were laid,
Related reading