US Energy Secretary Criticizes Europe’s Climate Policies as Economically Damaging
Published: 2026/02/18 05:44:13
US Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm sharply criticized European climate policies, arguing they are hindering economic growth. In a recent interview with Agence France-Presse (AFP), Granholm characterized the approach as a “climate cult,” suggesting an excessive focus on environmental goals at the expense of economic realities.
Granholm’s comments center on the belief that Europe’s stringent regulations and rapid transition to renewable energy sources are creating economic hardship. She specifically pointed to the impact on European industries, which she claims are struggling to compete globally due to higher energy costs and regulatory burdens. These costs, she argues, are driving businesses to relocate to countries with more favorable economic climates, like the United States.
“We’re seeing industries move to the US because of our more pragmatic approach,” Granholm stated to AFP. “They want a stable energy supply and a regulatory environment that doesn’t punish innovation.”
Europe’s commitment to the European Green Deal, a complete set of policy initiatives aimed at making Europe climate neutral by 2050, has been a central point of contention. The plan includes aspiring targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing renewable energy use, and improving energy efficiency. Critics argue these targets are unrealistic and economically damaging, while supporters maintain they are essential for addressing climate change and fostering long-term sustainability.
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), passed in the United States in 2022, provides considerable subsidies and tax credits for clean energy technologies. Granholm highlighted the IRA as a model for achieving climate goals without sacrificing economic competitiveness. She believes the IRA’s incentives are attracting investment and creating jobs in the US clean energy sector.
European officials have expressed concern that the IRA’s subsidies could disadvantage European companies. Some have called for a more coordinated transatlantic approach to climate policy and industrial strategy. The debate underscores the differing philosophies on how best to address climate change while maintaining economic prosperity.
Granholm’s remarks are likely to fuel further debate about the optimal path to a sustainable future. The tension between environmental ambition and economic pragmatism remains a central challenge for policymakers worldwide.
Keywords: Climate Policy, European Green Deal, US Energy Policy, Inflation Reduction Act, Renewable Energy, Economic Impact, Jennifer Granholm, Energy Transition, Climate Change, European Economy
Related reading